Flesh Against Fur: Buttocks, Bodies, Beasts, and the (Un)Hidden Relations in the Queer Forest

Main Article Content

Pachcharaporn Supaphol
Rawitawan Sophonpanich

Abstract

This article explores the depictions of bare-buttocked human figures and beasts that inhabit the bas-de-page (the lower margins) of The Rutland Psalter (1260), an illuminated manuscript containing religious texts such as the Psalms. Read through the frameworks of queer theory and post-human theory, the study finds that the depictions of bare-buttocked human figures and animals articulate queer desire in seven distinct modes: (1) a desire for intimate bodily fusion that seeks to dissolve the boundary between agent and recipient; (2) profound desire among male knights; (3) a desire to inflict pain as a mechanism for producing emotional bonds; (4) shared desire among humans, plants, and animals; (5) a desire oriented toward the exploration and experimentation of alternative identities; (6) sexual desire not confined solely to the reproduction of lineage; and (7) a desire structured as ongoing becoming. The study argues that a queer reading of the depictions of bare-buttocked human figures confronting animals in The Rutland Psalter reveals forms of queer desire that are not confined to the human body or to contemporary sexual paradigms. Rather, these images provocatively and fluidly blur the boundaries between humans and animals, generating modes of desire that unsettle and destabilize medieval constructions of identity and sexual normativity.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

British Archaeological Association. (2025, October 1). The Rutland Psalter and the Rise of Gothic Marginalia [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0sq9zNUw5c

British Library. (ca.1260). Additional MS 62925 [Manuscript collection]. British Library, London, United Kingdom.

Brown, K. (2017). Positioning, place, and penetration: The marginal sciopod of the Rutland Psalter. Bowdoin Journal of Art, (3), 1-14.

Camille, M. (1992). Image on the edge: The margins of Medieval art. Reaktion Books Limited.

Chrétien de Troyes. (1914). Romances arthuriennes [Arthurain romances]. Everyman’s Library.

Cohen, J. J. (1996). Monster culture (seven theses). In J. J. Cohen (Ed.), Monster theory: Reading culture (pp. 3-25). University of Minnesota Press.

Cohen, J. J. (2003). Medieval identity machines. University of Minnesota Press.

Desmond, M., & Sheingorn, P. (2001). Queering ovidian myth: Bestiality and desire in Christine de Pizan's Epistre Othea. In Glenn Burger & Steven F. Kruger (Eds.), Queering the Middle Ages (pp. 3-28). The University of Minnesota Press.

Dinshaw, C. (1999). Getting Medieval: Sexualities and communities. Duke University Press.

Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota.

Harris, N. (1995). The lion in Medieval Western Europe: Toward an interpretive history. Journal of Medieval History, 21(4), 365-386.

Mandelbaum, A. (Trans.). (1995). The Metamorphoses of Ovid. Harcourt Brace & Company.

Marie de France. (1996). Bisclavret [Bisclavret]. University of Florida.

Myers, N. (2017). From the anthropocene to the planthroposcene: Designing gardens for plant/people involution. History and Anthropology, 28(3), 297-315.

Roger of Howden. (1853). Chronica Magistri Rogeri de Houedene. Longman.

Steel, K. (2011). How to make a human: Animals and violence in the Middle Ages. Ohio State University Press.

Tudesko, J. L. (2022). Blood and body: Women's religious practices in late Medieval Europe [Master's thesis]. California State University, Sacramento.

University of Aberdeen. (n.d.). The Aberdeen bestiary: Folio 15r – De monocero; The monceros. De urso; The bear. https://www.abdn.ac.uk/bestiary/ms24/f15

Vasvári, L. O. (2006). Queer theory and discourses of desire. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1290