The effect of Structural Jointing System Using Wood Jointing Assembly Method for Toy Design from the Expert’s Point of View
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research are to study and design guideline of structural jointing system using wood jointing assembly method for assembling wooden work pieces instead of nuts or screws. Wood jointing methods of toy manufacturing is applied for future research and development of industrial design and educational purposes. That's the source, invented with the innovative design of a self-locking wood entry system using Medium Density Fiber Board as the main material for research. The research instruments were developed by the Matrix Analysis, Decision Making Matrix. Trade-off analysis methodology using Multivariate Analysis by NAKAYA program on Microsoft Excel, and expert opinion questionnaire which analyzed the data with Paired Comparison Analysis. The findings revealed that: 1) The slot taper joint locking method has the most excellent feature in every aspect. The structure is stable and does not wobbly, the functionality is easy to assemble. The appearance is unique, flexible with number of parts can be adapted to more materials. 2) The Slot clip joint locking method has an important feature in the appearance of the lock that unique, distinctive, look costly and luxury. 3) The Slot halved joints locking method have an important feature in the flexibility with suitable number of parts.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement
The copyright of this article is transferred to Journal of The Faculty of Architecture King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang with effect if and when the article is accepted for publication. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The author warrants that this contribution is original and that he/she has full power to make this grant. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.
References
กรมเสริมการค้าระหว่างประเทศ. (2564). DITP แนะผู้ผลิต ผู้ส่งออก วางแผนขยายตลาดของเล่น-อุปกรณ์กีฬาในสหรัฐฯ. เข้าถึงได้จาก: https://gnews.apps.go.th/news?news=78348.
พรเทพ เลิศเทวศิริ. (2533). องค์ประกอบในการออกแบบของเล่นเพื่อการศึกษาสำหรับเด็กปฐมวัยในทัศนะของผู้เชี่ยวชาญ. (วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญามหาบัณฑิต สาขาวิชาศิลปศึกษา ภาควิชาศิลปศึกษา, จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย).
พรเทพ เลิศเทวศิริ. (2545). Design education 1: รวมบทความและรายงานการวิจัยศาสตร์แห่งการออกแบบ. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
พรเทพ เลิศเทวศิริ. (2560). สถิติการเปรียบเทียบแบบเป็นคู่ (Paired comparison). เอกสารประกอบการสอนวิชาการออกแบบอุตสาหกรรมศิลป์.
อดิศักดิ์ ผลิตผลการพิมพ์. (2548). อันตรายจากของเล่น. นิตยสารหมอชาวบ้าน. (311).
เอกกมล เอี่ยมศรี (ผู้รวบรวม). (2564). กลยุทธ์ข้อมูลองค์กร (Data Strategy). เข้าถึงได้จาก: https://eiamsri.wordpress.com.
Chakrabarti, A. (1999). A product design principle. International Conference on Engineering Design ICED 99, Munich, August 24 -26, 1999.
Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., and Clarkson, P. J. (2004). Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design Studies, 25(6), 547–577.
Elemer, M.L. and Tamas, F. (2002). Finite element analysis of cross halved joints for structural composites. The Society of Wood Science and Technology. 34(2), 2002, 251-265.
Forestresearch (2011). Trade-off analysis. Retrieved from: https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/documents/2405/Toolbox_May2011_Trade_off_analysis.pdf.
Gary, R. (2020). The complete illustrated guide to joinery. Retrieved from: https://www.woodworking-camp.com/2020/03/complete-illustrated-guide-to-joinery.html
Janell D.T., Mitzi M.M., and Roger J.C. (2011). Form and Function: A Matter. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 28(3), 374-377.
Liedtka, J. and Ogilvie T. (2020). Designing for Growth: A design thinking tool kit for managers. Columbia business school publishing.
Mario, R. (2019). 11 Mortise and Tenon Variations. Retrieved from: https://www.finewoodworking.com/2019/02/11/11-mortise-and-tenon-variations.
Mark, M. (2014). CNC Cut Wood Joinery. Retrieved from: http://mkmra2.blogspot.com/2014/08/cnc-cut-wood-joinery.html.
Post, R.A.G., Blijlevens, J., and Hekkert, P. (2016). ‘To preserve unity while almost allowing for chaos’: Testing the aesthetic principle of unity-in-variety in product design. Acta Psychologica, 163, 142-152.
Ride Toy Zone. (2021). The Different Types Of Ride On Toy Cars For Kids. Retrieved from: https://ridetoyzone.com/types-of-ride-on-toy-cars.
Solomon, M. R. (1983). The role of products as social stimuli: A symbolic interactionism perspective. Journal of Consumer Research 10(3), 319–329.
Sylcott, B., Cagan, J., and Tabibnia, G. (2011). Understanding of emotions and reasoning during consumer tradeoff between function and aesthetics in product design. Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2011, Washington, DC, USA, August 28-31.
Ted, R. (2019). Loose-Wedge Mortise & Tenon Joints. Retrieved from: https://www.woodsmith.com/article/loose-wedge-mortise-tenon-joints-basic-tusk-tenon.
Wazzadu. (2560). ไม้ MDF BOARD (Medium Density FiberBoard) กับคุณสมบัติที่น่ารู้ก่อนจะนำเอาไปใช้งาน. เข้าถึงได้จาก: https://www.wazzadu.com/article/1209.
Yamanaka, T. (1997). Designing with left brain explore scientific design. Kaibundo Publishing, Tokyo.