Studying The Effective of Mascot Coco in Representing The Brand Personality of King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang

Main Article Content

Worapon Yuangngoen


The purpose of this research was to study the efficiency of the mascot, Coco, in representing the brand personality of King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang. Using the brand archetypes personality approach, the researcher conducted a focus group interview with four key informants to determine the brand personality of King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang. The researcher then used survey research to collect data from 463 respondents, comprising staff and students.

These are the results of studying the effectiveness of mascot Coco in representing six brand personalities of King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang: Coco cannot represent the Sage personality (M = 3.14, S.D. = 1.15). Coco is effective in representing the Hero personality (M = 3.65, S.D. = 1.13). Coco cannot represent the Creator personality (M = 3.16, S.D. = 1.11). Coco is effective in representing the Caregiver personality (M = 3.62, S.D. = 1.16). Coco is effective in representing the Everyman personality (M = 3.7, S.D. = 1.06). Coco cannot represent the Rebel personality (M = 3.21, S.D. = 1.14).

Article Details

How to Cite
Yuangngoen, W. (2023). Studying The Effective of Mascot Coco in Representing The Brand Personality of King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang. Asian Creative Architecture, Art and Design, 36(2), 168–179. Retrieved from
Research Articles


Boonnak, M. (2011). Statistics for research and decision making: Techniques for data analysis and explanation of results (8th ed.).

Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)

Brown, S. (2014). Animal house: Brand mascots, mascot brands and more besides. Journal of customer behaviour, 13(2), 77-92.

Cayla, J. (2013). Brand mascots as organisational totems. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(1-2), 86-104.

Chaiyajan, T. (2020). Symbolic interaction theory to mascot design: Case study of the Faculty of Fine Art and Industrial Design RMUT. Parichart Journal Thaksin University, 34(1), 230-251. (in Thai)

Chanthaplaboon, T., & Srirattanamongkol, S. (2015). Study and mascot design for a university in Nakhorn Pathom province. Christian University of Thailand Journal, 21(1), 99-109. (in Thai)

Cohen, R. J. (2014). Brand personification: Introduction and overview. Psychology & Marketing, 31(1), 1-30.

Faber, M. A., & Mayer, J. D. (2009). Resonance to archetypes in media: There’s some accounting for taste. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 307-322.

Hoolwerff, D. (2014). Does your mascot match your brand's personality? [Master thesis communication science, University of Twente].

iNN News. (2021, July 15). “Buddy B” The fellow mascot of Benchachinda people: A great strategy to build a brand within the

organization. (in Thai)

Jennifer L Aaker. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347-356.

Judson, K. M., Aurand, T. W., Gorchels, L., & Gordon, G. L. (2008). Building a university brand from within: University administrators' perspectives of internal branding. Services Marketing Quarterly, 30(1), 54-68.

KMITL. (2016). KMITL Vision and Strategy. (in Thai)

KMITL, Human Resource. (2022). Human Resource Management and Devlopment Strategic Plan 2023-2026. (in Thai)

Mark, M., & Pearson, C. (2001). The hero and the outlaw: Building extraordinary brands through the power of archetypes. McGraw-Hill.

Pairoa, I., & Arunrangsiwed, P. (2016). An overview on the effectiveness of brand mascot and celebrity endorsement. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation, 10(12), 3536-3542.

Patterson, A., Khogeer, Y., & Hodgson, J. (2013). How to create an influential anthropomorphic mascot: Literary musings on marketing, make-believe, and meerkats. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(1-2), 69-85.

Patterson, C. A., Beach, D. M., Reyes, J. M., & Sloan, S. M. (2021). Stakeholder perceptions and experiences of a college live mascot program: a study of higher education ad hoc change. Innovative Higher Education, 46, 377–392.

Poksupphiboon, A., & Srikanlayanabuth, A. (2020). The guidelines for design kawaii local characters and mascots. Institute of Culture and Arts Journal, 123-165. (in Thai)

Prueangphong, P., & Disakul Na Ayudhya, U.-E. (2016). Mascot design for chiangmai cultural events. Journal of Fine and Applied Arts Chulalongkorn University, 2(2), 59-68. (in Thai)

Punjard, N. (2018). An Exploratory Factor Analysis of Brand Personality of Thai Universities. Journal of public relations and advertising, 11(2), 77-93. (in Thai)

Rauschnabel, P. A., Krey, N., Babin, B. J., & Ivens, B. S. (2016). Brand management in higher education: The university brand personality scale. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 1-10.

Rungvimolsin, R., & Vungsuntitum, S. (2019). Media exposure, engagement with trade character and brand loyalty. Journal of Public Relations and Advertising, 12(2), 49-62. (in Thai)

Satyagraha, A., & Mahatmi, N. (2018). Study of mascot design character as part of city branding: Malang city. ULTIMART Jurnal Komunikasi Visual, 11(2), 7-15.

Sevier, R. A. (2001). Brand as relevance. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10(3), 77-97.

Simkus, J. (2022, January 7). Quota sampling: Definition, method and examples.

Sookpatdhee, T. (2016). The mascots concept design to promote the image of the city tourism of Japan. Payap University Journal, 26(2), 17-31. (in Thai)

Stephen Brown. (2010). Where the wild brands are: Some thoughts on anthropomorphic marketing. The Marketing Review, 10(3), 209-224.

Xara-Brasil, D., Hamza, K. M., & Marquina, P. (2018). The meaning of a brand? An archetypal approach. Revista de Gestão, 25(2), 142-159.

Yadav, P. (2015). Anthropomorphic brand mascot serve as the vehicle to quickly remind customers who you are and what you stand for in indian cultural context [Conference]. ICCVAD, Paris.