Corporate Identity Design for Office of Digital Technology, Khon Kaen University

Main Article Content

Ackapol Lamuang

Abstract

This creative research focuses on the design and development of a corporate identity for the Office of Digital Technology, Khon Kaen University, the primary unit responsible for driving the institution’s digital strategy in teaching, research, academic services, and Smart Campus development. The project aims to create a visual identity that reflects technological advancement while preserving the Isan region’s cultural heritage, ensuring that it is clearly visible in the agency’s visual communication and recognized both within and outside the university. The study reinterprets the university’s three-segment emblem—originally representing “Philosophy, Ethics, and Wisdom”—within a modern digital context, aligning it with three core dimensions: (1) Philosophy in Information Technology (blue–navy tones symbolizing stability, trustworthiness, and security), (2) Ethical Digital Behavior (gold–orange tones symbolizing purity, warmth, and optimism), and (3) Digital Intelligence and Wisdom (pink–purple tones symbolizing wisdom, elegance, and intelligent application). Curved lines and circular dots are incorporated to convey connectivity and innovation while preserving the graceful qualities of local art forms.


The research employed a mixed-methods approach under the Research Through Design Framework, structured into five stages: (1) document analysis on the organization’s history, identity, and strategic plans, along with case studies of corporate identities from comparable technology-focused institutions, (2) development of three conceptual approaches—Typography, Monogram, and Mixed-Modern, (3) creation of prototypes and preliminary evaluation, (4) refinement of the final corporate identity system, and (5) expert evaluation by ten professionals in graphic design, corporate identity, and organizational communication using a five-point rating scale.


Findings from the comparative analysis and expert evaluation indicated that the “Mixed-Modern” approach was the most suitable, achieving a balanced integration of modernity and cultural reference. Expert evaluation yielded an overall mean score of 4.73 out of 5 (S.D. = 0.43), categorized as “highest,” with top scores in modernity, mission alignment, and applicability across different media. The lowest-scoring aspect, balance between contemporary and cultural elements (4.30, “high”), reflects the inherent challenges of cross-cultural design. The final identity design demonstrates high versatility, applicable to printed media, digital platforms, signage, and branded merchandise.


The research generates three main contributions: (1) a conceptual framework for corporate identity design that integrates local cultural heritage with contemporary digital aesthetics, (2) a methodology for reinterpreting and applying institutional symbols in a digital context while retaining their original values, and (3) an integrated design and evaluation process applicable to technology-focused units in higher education. It is recommended that a comprehensive Corporate Identity System manual be developed to establish correct, consistent usage standards across all media, ensuring effective and sustainable organizational communication.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lamuang, A. (2025). Corporate Identity Design for Office of Digital Technology, Khon Kaen University. Asian Creative Architecture, Art and Design, e281009 . retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/archkmitl/article/view/281009
Section
Research Articles

References

Alessandri, S. W., Yang, S. U., & Kinsey, D. F. (2006). An integrative approach to university visual identity and reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(4), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550033

Almnshdawy, H. A., & Mohammed, K. H. (2024). Digital transformation in design and the impact of modern tools and technologies. Global Prosperity, 4(1), 3-14. https://gprosperity.org/index.php/journal/article/view/126

Budelmann, K., Kim, Y., & Wozniak, C. (2010). Brand identity essentials: 100 principles for designing logos and building brands. Rockport Publishers.

Chandler, D. (2017). Semiotics: The basics (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315311050

Christou, E., Owen, V., & Ceyhan, P. (2023). The little book of creative evaluation. Imagination Lancaster, Lancaster University. https://imagination.lancaster.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Little-Book-of-CE-Digital-PDF-2023.pdf

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cuomo, M. T., & Foroudi, P. (Eds.). (2023). Digital transformation and corporate branding: Opportunities and pitfalls for identity and reputation management. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003263784

Feigenbaum, E. A., & Nelson, M. R. (Eds.). (2024). Korea's path to digital leadership: How Seoul can lead on standards and standardization. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/02/koreas-path-to-digital-leadership-how-seoul-can-lead-on-standards-and-standardization?lang=en

Foroudi, P., Melewar, T. C., & Gupta, S. (2017). Corporate logo: History, definition, and components. International Studies of Management and Organization, 47(2), 176–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2017.1256166

Foroudi, P., Nazarian, A., Ziyadin, S., Kitchen, P. J., Hafeez, K., Priporas, C., & Pantano, E. (2020). Co-creating brand identity by engaging internal stakeholders in the design of brand logo and website. Journal of Business Research, 114, 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.035

Halskov, K., & Christensen, B. T. (2018). Designing across cultures. CoDesign, 14(2), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1459101

Johansen, T. S., & Gregersen, M. K. (2024). The authenticity of organizational-level visual identity in the context of strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 18(5), 404–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2024.2352114

Kavaratzis, M., & Hatch, M. J. (2013). The dynamics of place brands: An identity-based approach to place branding theory. Marketing Theory, 13(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593112467268

Khon Kaen University. (n.d.). Emblem. University symbol and motto. https://kku.ac.th/th/about/emblem/

Lamuang, A., Lertnimanoradee, M., & Chantaree, T. (2024). Corporate identity design for the KKU Smart Farm project, Khon Kaen University. Built Environment Inquiry, 23(3), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.14456/bei.2024.21 (in Thai)

Lewandowska, K., Ochsner, M., & Kulczycki, E. (2023). Research quality criteria in the Creative Arts. Studies in Higher Education, 49(4), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2248174

Lucarelli, A., & Hallin, A. (2014). Brand transformation: a performative approach to brand regeneration. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(1–2), 84–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.982688

Melewar, T. C., & Jenkins, E. (2002). Defining the corporate identity construct. Corporate Reputation Review, 5(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540166

Nadin, M. (2007). Semiotic Machine. Public Journal of Semiotics, 1(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.37693/pjos.2007.1.8815

Office of Digital Technology, Khon Kaen University. (2025). About us. https://digital.kku.ac.th/content/ee02f153-89e6-4b0f-b027-343c5083ab24?c=about

Peleggi, M. (2013). From Buddhist icons to national antiquities: Cultural nationalism and colonial knowledge in the making of Thailand’s history of art. Modern Asian Studies, 47(5), 1520–1548. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X12000224

Pongnattakorn, S., & Jaturongkakul, K. (2022). Corporate identity design for the Computer Center, Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University. Proceedings of the 23rd National Graduate Research Conference, Khon Kaen University, 644-657. https://app.gs.kku.ac.th/gs/th/publicationfile/item/23rd-grc-2022/HMP2/HMP2.pdf (in Thai)

Reynolds, A. (2023, October 14). Semiotics in art and design: The power of symbols and signs. Ren Creative Works. https://adrianreynolds.ie/semiotics-in-art-and-design

Sengna, K. (2024). Isan Palettes: BACC pop⋅up special project. Bangkok Art and Culture Centre. https://www.bacc.or.th/en/events/78113

Tandet, J. (2024, April 8). Understanding digital transformation in higher education. Modern Campus. https://moderncampus.com/blog/digital-transformation-in-higher-education.html

Thuaisom, J. (2011). Traces of Isan culture. Journal of Fine and Applied Arts, Khon Kaen University, 3(2), 38-55. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/fakku/article/view/27205/23116 (in Thai)

Van den Bosch, A. L. M., De Jong, M. D. T., & Elving, W. J. L. (2005). How corporate visual identity supports reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280510596925

Van Riel, C. B. M., & Van den Ban, A. (2001). The added value of corporate logos ‐ An empirical study. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3-4), 428–440. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560110382093

Wessel, L., Baiyere, A., Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Cha, J., & Blegind Jensen, T. (2021). Unpacking the Difference Between Digital Transformation and IT-Enabled Organizational Transformation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(1), 102-129. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00655

Wheeler, A. (2018). Designing brand identity: An essential guide for the whole branding team (5th ed.). Wiley.