Patience Capital in the Cultivation of Top Innovative Undergraduate Talents: A Four-Dimensional Analytical Framework
Main Article Content
Abstract
The cultivation of top innovative talents has become the strategic core of building a powerful country through higher education in the new era. However, the efficiency paradox between resource input and talent output has long plagued educational practice, whose deep root lies in the absence of a patience logic in the training system. As an economic concept, patience capital emphasizes long-term investment, risk tolerance, and strategic commitment, which is highly consistent with the growth law of top innovative talents. Using the conceptual research method, this study introduces patience capital into the field of education, defines the concept of patience capital in the context of top innovative talent cultivation, and constructs a four-dimensional analytical framework consisting of temporal resources, error-tolerant resources, relational resources, and cultural resources. Applying this framework to examine the current situation of top innovative talent cultivation in China, we can see dilemmas such as accelerationism squeezing the cultivation cycle, performatism dispelling the spirit of exploration, instrumentalization of teacher-student relationships, and superficial coating of growth culture. To solve these dilemmas, we can systematically reconstruct the system from four dimensions: time perspective, evaluation perspective, teacher-student perspective, and resource perspective, promoting the shift of talent cultivation from a hot money logic to a patience logic and moving toward a nurturing cultivation model. For University Administrators Substantially promote flexible schooling reform and extend the evaluation cycle to the whole undergraduate period. Establish a “valuable failure” identification mechanism to provide institutional tolerance for high-risk exploration. Invest in teacher-student relationship construction, reduce supervisors’ burdens, and create non-utilitarian dialogue space.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ปรากฏในวารสารนี้ เป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียน ซึ่งสมาคมนักวิจัยไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วยเสมอไป การนำเสนอผลงานวิจัยและบทความในวารสารนี้ไปเผยแพร่สามารถกระทำได้ โดยระบุแหล่งอ้างอิงจาก "วารสารสมาคมนักวิจัย"
References
Bloom, B. S., & Gage, N. L. (1985). The study of talented children. In Gifted and talented children, (pp. 69-88.). Springer.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook oftheory and research for the sociology of education, (pp. 241-258). Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. (2nd ed., R., Trans.). SAGE.
Chen, Y. F. (2024). Characterization, causes and responses to the "coating" phenomenon of young people's outlook on life. Studies on Core Socialist Values, 10(3), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.16513/j.shzyhxjzgyj.2024.03.008
Dai, Y., & Yang, Y. W. (2024). The change logic and future prospects of China’s top innovative talent training policies: A historical institutionalism analysis. Journal ofHigher Education Management, 18(3), 62-72.https://doi.org/10.13316/j.cnki.jhem.20240409.007
Deeg, R., & Hardie, I. (2016). What is patient capital and who supplies it?. Socio-Economic Review, 14(4), 627-645. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mww025
Fan, Y. X. (2018). Educational capital: Definition, model and operation analysis. Journal ofEducational Studies, 14(1), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.14082/j.cnki.1673-1298.2018.01.007
Feng, H. (2025). Return daily examinations to the fundamental goal of education: On the logical transformation and institutional reconstruction of basic education evaluation. Ministry ofEducation ofthe People 's Republic of China. Retrieved from https://fx.xwapp.moe.gov.cn/article/202512/6942554bcc32e7223eea5f03.html
Gong, L. et al. (2026). On the theoretical and practical logic of "tolerance for failure" motivating breakthroughs in key core technologies. Innovation Science and Technology, 26(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.19345/j.cxkj.1671-0037.2026.3.1
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
Jiang, B. J., & Wu, Q. C. (2024). Investment in "patient capital" and the guarantee of Chinese youth's skill learning. Journal ofEast China Normal University (Educational Sciences Edition), 42(4), 76-87. https://doi.org/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2024.04.007
Jin, S. (2022). The symbolic mechanism of educational coating and its social effects. Journal ofHigher Education, 43(2), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.16745/j.cnki.cn61-1300/g4.2022.02.004
Li, L. G., & Chen, X. Y. (2025). Exploration and improvement strategies of the training mode for top innovative talents in universities. Social Sciences of Beijing, 1, 99-108. https://doi.org/10.13262/j.bjsshkxy.bjshkx.250109
Li, S. L. (2026). The theoretical concept of patient capital and its people-oriented development concept. Academic Exploration. Retrieved from https://link.cnki.net/urlid/53.1148.C.20260228.1019.002
Li, S. et al. (2024). Promoting the development of new productive forces with patient capital: Characteristics, significance, current problems and cultivation paths. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 10, 14-28. https://doi.org/10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2024.10.002
Lin, Y. F., & Wang, Y. (2017). New structural economics: Taking "patient capital" as a comparative advantage. Research on Developmental Finance, 11(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.16556/j.cnki.kfxjr.2017.01.001
Liu, S. S. (2014). The element structure and development of teachers' educational capital. Research in Educational Development, 33(24), 64-69. https://doi.org/10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855.2014.24.012
Liu, T. Y. (2025). The dynamic admission and withdrawal mechanism of the "Top-notch Students Program" should get out of the predicament of "valuing selection over cultivation". ScienceNet. Retrieved from https://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2025/7/547384.shtm
MacInnis, D. J. (2011). A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 136-154.
Meredith, J. (1993). Theory building through conceptual methods. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13(5), 3-11.
Shao, Z. B. (2022). Reflection on the capitalization of education. Research in Educational Development, 42(4), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855.2022.04.010
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Johns Hopkins University.
Su, C. J., & Zhao, C. L. (2010). An analysis of the formation of "problem students" from the perspective of Bourdieu's capital theory Chinese Journal of Special Education, 8, 65-79. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2010.08.012
Subotnik, R. F. et al. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
Yan, K., & Wu, H. (2020). International trends in the cultivation of top talents and their enlightenment to China. Educational Research, 41(6), 78-91. https://doi.org/10.14121/j.cnki.1002-8064.2020.06.008
Zhang, X. C. (2025). Empowering the growth of top innovative talents with institutional innovation. China Higher Education, 5, 10-13. https://doi.org/10.16697/j.cnki.xdjygl. 2025.05.003
