THE CYCLE OF POLITICAL CRISIS IN THAILAND OVER TWO DECADES: FROM PARLIAMENTARY DICTATORSHIP TO CAPITAL-AND-ELITE-CAPTURED DEMOCRACY (2001–2025)

Authors

  • Jakkit Krataiwongphachand Independent Scholar
  • Vittawat Tichawanich Independent Scholar
  • Woraphan Chandrakulsiri Independent Scholar

Keywords:

Political Crisis, State Capture, Legal Engineering

Abstract

This academic article aims to critique and deconstruct the concept of “political mutation” or the “Scambodia Syndrome” discourse, which often explains the failure of Thai democracy as a biological pathology or a genetic abnormality. It proposes a legal-political analytical framework to explain the cycle of political conflict crises in Thailand over two decades (2001–2025) through the theories of “Competitive Authoritarianism” and “State Capture”. The findings indicate that the decline of Thai democracy is not a coincidence but the result of strategic interactions between majority political capital capturing state mechanisms and traditional elite networks responding with “Lawfare” tactics and military coups to maintain the balance of power. This cycle resulted in the phenomenon of an “Elite Settlement” following the 2023 general election, leading to the formation of a cross-bloc government to protect the interests of monopoly capital and block the participation of emerging social forces. Comparative studies of Peru, South Korea, and Malaysia confirm that these political crisis cycles can be resolved through institutional reforms based on international standards. Consequently, the study proposes a solution through “Legal Engineering” to establish a genuine “Rule of Law,” defined as a legal system where everyone is equally subject to the same rules, state power is constrained by legal principles, and the judiciary remains independent of political interference. Key recommendations include reforming the origins and structures of independent organizations to prevent cronyism, establishing regulations to prevent state capture by monopoly capital through trade competition law reform, and drafting a people’s constitution to serve as a new social contract for a sustainable democratic future.

References

สุวิทย์ เมษินทรีย์. (2568). ประชาธิปไตยเทียมข้ามสายพันธุ์: ชักนำไทยสู่ Scambodia Syndrome. สืบค้น 13 กุมภาพันธ์ 2568, จาก https://shorturl.asia/AS57a

Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Publishers.

_____ (2019). The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty. New York: Penguin Press.

Case, W. (2017). Stress testing the malicious state in Malaysia. The Pacific Review, 30(5), 747–766.

De Tocqueville, A. (2003). Democracy in America. London: Penguin Classics.

Degregori, C. I. (2012). How Difficult It Is to Be God: Shining Path's Politics of War in Peru, 1980-1999. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Hellman, J. S. et al. (2003). Seize the state, seize the day: State capture and influence in transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(4), 751–773.

Hewison, K. (2014). Considerations on inequality and politics in Thailand. Democratization, 21(5), 846–866.

Kim, H. (2017). Korea’s Grievous War between Old and New Power. Seoul, South Korea: East Asia Foundation.

Lee, H. K. (2018). The Candlelight Revolution and the Reality of Democracy in South Korea. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(4), 687–698.

Levitsky, S. & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marx, K. (1990). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. London: Penguin Books.

McCargo, D. (2005). Network monarchy and semi-democracy in Thailand. The Pacific Review, 18(4), 499–519.

McMillan, J. & Zoido, P. (2004). How to Subvert Democracy: Montesinos in Peru. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(4), 69–92.

Mérieau, E. (2016). Thailand’s Deep State, Royal Power and the Constitutional Court (1997–2015). Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(3), 445–466.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pasuk P. & Baker, C. (2004). Thaksin: The Business of Politics in Thailand. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.

Schedler, A. (Ed.). (2006). Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Sontag, S. (1978). Illness as Metaphor. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Svolik, M. W. (2012). The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Welsh, B. (2018). "Saviour" Politics and Malaysia's 2018 Electoral Tsunami. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3), 85–108.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-26

How to Cite

Krataiwongphachand, J., Tichawanich, V., & Chandrakulsiri, W. (2026). THE CYCLE OF POLITICAL CRISIS IN THAILAND OVER TWO DECADES: FROM PARLIAMENTARY DICTATORSHIP TO CAPITAL-AND-ELITE-CAPTURED DEMOCRACY (2001–2025). Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovation Review, 9(1), 385–398. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jidir/article/view/285716