Participation of people in the Implementation process of Patong Administrative OrganiztionSoidao District Chanttaburi Province

  • Supharada Ngobsungnone
Keywords: Participation, people in the Implementation process

Abstract

The researoh  is “Participation  of  people  in  the  Implementation  process  of  Patong Administrative Organiztion, Soidao District, Chanttaburi  Province”. There  is the objective for study participating in level of people in the implementation process of Patong Administrative Organization, Soidao District, Canttaburi Province. And for compare with “Participation  of  people  in  the  Implementation  process  of  Patong Administrative Organiztion, Soidao District, Chanttaburi  Province”. Separate  trail change, gender, age, marriage status, occupation, earnings, education level, by collect data from the sample, peoples in Soidao District, Chanttaburi Province, number 356 persona. Amount use the statistics in data analysis, be, frequency value,(Frequency), and percentage value, (Percentage), average, (Mean), and the value deviates the standard, (Standard Diviation), and compare with the opinion of people builds the efficiency in work practice of people  in  the  Implementation  process  of  Patong Administrative Organiztion, Soidao District, Chanttaburi  Province. Separate  trail change, use the statistics in data analysis, be, t – test , for compare with the difference between free variable at has 2 the group, and, One – way ANOVA, for compare with the difference between free variable at has since, 3 the group goes up, when, meet the difference then compare with to lay a pair by use the way of, LSD (Least significant difference test), by fix .05 significance way statistics levels, The Education, Meet That.

            The Education, Meet That, people Participation of people in the Implementation  process  of  Patong Administrative Organiztion, Soidao District, Chanttaburi  Province. By overall side participating in image in the evaluation is in many level, there the average 3.45 .Considering is eachaspect sort from much go for little. Meet That, The joint practice at a high level the average 3.64 , Subordinate the co – benefits at a high level the average 3.57, The joint plan at a medium level the average 3.40, The joint monitoring and evaluation at a medium level the average 3.38 and The share ideas at a medium level the average 3.24 . Compare with participating of people in the  Implementation  process  of  Patong Administrative Organiztion, Soidao District, Chanttaburi  Province. Separate follow personal character, meet that, people who have the education level differently participate in the Implementation  process  of  Patong Administrative Organiztion, Soidao District, Chanttaburi  Province, differently by fix .05 significance way statistics levels which is based on the assumption . Part  gender, age, marriage status, occupation, earnings differently have Participation of people in the  Implementation  process  of  Patong Administrative Organiztion, Soidao District, Chanttaburi Province, not differently which did not meet the assumptions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berger, E.H. (1975). Parents as partners in education: School – based programs
(4 ed.). Columbus: A Simon & Sehuster.
Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5 ed.). New York: Happr
Collins.
Keith, M. (1972). Communicate 2: English for social interaction. Cambridgc:
Cambridgc University Press.
Maslow, A H (1970). Quality of working life. What is it?. Sloan Management
Review, 15(Fall).
Parsons, R. (1951). Improving Life At Work. Behavioral Approaches to Organizational
Chage. Califonia: goodyear.
Recder, T. (1974). Participation Management: Concept. Theory and Implementation.
Atlanta. GA: Grorgia State Universitiy
Weber, M. (1966). Human Characteristics and School Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill
Sowell, E. J. (1996). Curriculum an integrative. New Jersey: Prentice – Half.
Published
2019-05-28
Section
Research articles