How does News-Based Sentiment Affect Stock Market Volatility in the Stock Exchange of Thailand?
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of the study is to investigate the predictive power of news-based sentiment and the effects on volatility of equity returns during November 2017- February 2019. The stock market sentiment is extracted from a corpus of the headline financial news that is related to the Stock Exchange of Thailand.
We find that the news-based sentiment index exhibits the predictive power over SET, SET50 and SET100 returns. In addition, the positive market sentiment significantly affects the volatility in SET50 and SET100 index returns during the period. As the positive sentiment increases, the volatility of SET50 and SET100 returns decreases.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The articles published in the journals are the authors' opinions, not the opinion of the editorial team or administrative staff. The articles published is copyright of the Journal of Business Administration and Accounting, Khon Kaen University.
References
Allan, D.E., McAleer, M.J. & Singh, A.K. (2015). Machine news and volatility: The Dow Jones industrial average and the TRNA real-time high-frequency sentiment series. In Gregoriou, G.N. (Ed.). The handbook of high frequency trading. (pp.327-44). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Atkins A., Niranjan, M. & Gerding, E. (2018). Financial news predicts stock market volatility better than close price. The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 4(2),120-137.
Boudoukh, F., Feldman, R. Kogan, S. & Richardson, M. (2012). Which news moves stock prices? a textual analysis. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Ferguson, N.J.et al. (2015). Media content and stock returns: the predictive power of press. Multinational Finance Journal, 19(1), 1-31.
Garcia, D. (2013). Sentiment during recessions. The Journal of Finance, 68(3), 1267-1300.
Gotthelf, N. & Uhl, M.W. (2018). News sentiment - a new yield curve factor. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 19(3), 31-41.
Heston, S.L. & Sinha, N.R. (2017). News versus sentiment: predicting stock returns from news stories. Financial Analysts Journal, 73(3), 67-83.
Lamoureux, C. & Lastrapes, W. (1990). Heteroskedasticity in stock return data: volume versus GARCH effects. The Journal of Finance, 45(1), 221-229.
Loughran, T. & McDonald, B. (2011). When is a liability not a liability? textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. The Journal of Finance, 66(1), 35–65.
McLaren, N. & Shanbhogue, R. (2011). Using internet search data as economic indicators. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Nelson, D.B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 59(2),347-370.
Tetlock, P. (2007). Giving content to investor sentiment: the role of media in the stock market. Journal of Finance, 62(3), 1139–1168.
Tetlock, P., Saar-Tsechansky M. & Macskassy S. (2008). More than words: quantifying language to measure firms’ fundamentals. Journal of Finance, 63(3), 1437–1467.
Uhl, M.W. (2014). Reuters sentiment and stock returns, Journal of Behavioral Finance, 15(4), 287-298.
Uhl, M.W. (2017). Emotions matter: sentiment and momentum in foreign exchange, Journal of Behavioral Finance, 18 (3),249-257.