Enhancing Trust and Engagement Among Thai E-Learning Consumers Through AI Personalization, Chatbots, and E-Service Quality

Main Article Content

Natinee Thanajaro
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3936-4271

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) personalization, chatbots, and e-service quality on customer experience, flow state, and learning outcomes, as well as how these factors influence customer trust and engagement among Thai e-learning users. Methodology: Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to test the proposed conceptual framework based on data collected from 498 Thai e-learning platform users through a quantitative survey. Findings: AI personalization and chatbots significantly improved customer experience and learning outcomes. AI personalization also increased flow state, whereas the chatbot–flow path was not supported. E-service quality showed no unique effect once AI personalization and chatbots were modeled. Learning outcomes were the only significant proximal predictor of customer trust and customer engagement. Overall, personalization and chatbots primarily influenced trust and customer engagement indirectly by enhancing learning outcomes. Applications of this study: The findings provide actionable insights for regulators, platform operators, and educational institutions. Prioritizing adaptive AI personalization and responsive chatbot support can strategically improve learning outcomes to ultimately foster greater trust and sustained engagement in Thailand’s e-learning ecosystem.

Article Details

How to Cite
Thanajaro, N. (2026). Enhancing Trust and Engagement Among Thai E-Learning Consumers Through AI Personalization, Chatbots, and E-Service Quality. KKBS Journal of Business Administration and Accountancy, 10(1), 87–112. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kkbsjournal/article/view/282070
Section
Research Articles

References

Ali, D., Naseem, U., Shafiq, M., & Imran, M. (2024). ChatGPT in teaching and learning: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(6), 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060643

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004

Ameen, N., Tarhini, A., Reppel, A., & Anand, A. (2021). Customer experiences in the age of artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106548

Annamalai, N., Eltahir, M. E., Zyoud, S. H., Soundrarajan, D., Zakarneh, B., & Al Salhi, N. R. (2023). Exploring English language learning via chatbot: A case study from a self determination theory perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100148.

Aroonsrimarakot, S., Laiphrakpam, M., Chathiphot, P., Saengsai, P., & Prasri, S. (2023). Online learning challenges in Thailand and strategies to overcome the challenges from the students’ perspectives. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 8153–8170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11530-6

Assami, S., Daoudi, N., & Ajhoun, R. (2018, April 17-20). Personalization criteria for enhancing learner engagement in MOOC platforms. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain, 1265–1272.

Bae, H., & Bozkurt, A. (2024). The untold story of training students with generative AI: Are we preparing students for true learning or just personalization? Online Learning, 28(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4689

Baha, T., El Hajji, M., Es-Saady, Y., & Fadili, H. (2024). The impact of educational chatbot on student learning experience. Education and Information Technologies, 29(8), 10153–10176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12543-y

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the Era of Generative Artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100136

Baskara, R. (2024). Generative AI as an enabler of sustainable education: Theoretical perspectives and future directions. British Journal of Teacher Education and Pedagogy, 3(3), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.32996/bjtep.2024.3.3.9

Bettayeb, A. M., Abu Talib, M., Altayasinah, A. Z. S., & Dakalbab, F. (2024). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT: Conversational AI in education. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1379796. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1379796

Bhati, N. S., Srivastava, S., & Rathore, J. S. (2023). Measurement of doctoral students’ intention to use online learning: A SEM approach using the TRAM model. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 22, 179–200. https://doi.org/10.28945/5180

Bhattacherjee, A. (2002). Individual trust in online firms: Scale development and initial test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 211–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045715

Bhuiyan, M. S. (2024). The role of AI-enhanced personalization in customer experiences. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 6(1), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2024.6.1.17

Blut, M., Chowdhry, N., Mittal, V., & Brock, C. (2015). E-service quality: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Retailing, 91(4), 679–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2015.05.004

Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z

Borsci, S., Malizia, A., Schmettow, M., van der Velde, F., Tariverdiyeva, G., Balaji, D., & Chamberlain, A. (2021). The chatbot usability scale: The design and pilot of a usability scale. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 26, 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-021-01582-9

Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., Jurić, B., & Ilić, A. (2011). Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 252–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670511411703

Brady, M. K., & Cronin, J. J., Jr. (2001). Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Marketing, 65(3), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.3.34.18334

Cai, X., Cebollada, J., & Cortiñas, M. (2022). Self-report measure of dispositional flow experience in the video game context: Conceptualisation and scale development. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 159, 102746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102746

Chen, Q., Gong, Y., Lu, Y., & Tang, J. (2022). Classifying and measuring the service quality of AI chatbot in frontline service. Journal of Business Research, 145, 552–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.088

Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41, 745–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y

Chonraksuk, J., & Boonlue, S. (2024). Development of an AI predictive model to categorize and predict online learning behaviors of students in Thailand. Heliyon, 10(11), e32591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32591

Chung, M., Ko, E., Joung, H., & Kim, S. J. (2020). Chatbot e-service and customer satisfaction regarding luxury brands. Journal of Business Research, 117, 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.004

Contrino, M. F., Reyes-Millán, M., Vázquez-Villegas, P. and Membrillo-Hernandez, J. (2024). Using an adaptive learning tool to improve student performance and satisfaction in online and face-to-face education for a more personalized approach. Smart Learning Environments, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00292-y

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Dmello, V. J., Chandra, S., Rajendran, A., Bidi, S. B., Matha, R., Kaur, J., Rodrigues, P. S., Sowmya, & Mendonca, L. A. (2024). A systematic review on the efficacy of flow experience on continuance intention in e learning. Electronic Journal of e Learning, 22(9), 3425. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.9.3425

Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21, 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y

Ellikkal, A., & Rajamohan, S. (2024). AI-enabled personalized learning: Empowering management students for improving engagement and academic performance. Vilakshan – XIMB Journal of Management, 22(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/XJM-02-2024-0023

Flores, A., Alfaro, L., Herrera, J., & Hinojosa, E. (2019). Proposal models for personalization of e-learning based on flow theory and artificial intelligence. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 10(7), 380–390.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Ha, Y. & Im, H. (2020). The role of an interactive visual learning tool and its personalizability in online learning: Flow experience. Online Learning, 24(1), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i1.1620

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed). Cengage Learning.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2009). Flow online: Lessons learned and future prospects. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(1), 23–34.

Hollebeek, L. D. (2014). Consumer brand engagement in social media: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.002

Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial intelligence in service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517752459

Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). Engaged to a robot? The role of AI in service. Journal of Service Research, 24(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520902267

Kaiss, W., Mansouri, K., & Poirier, F. (2023). Effectiveness of an adaptive learning chatbot on students’ learning outcomes based on learning styles. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(13), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i13.39329

Kim, L., Pongsakornrungsilp, P., Pongsakornrungsilp, S., Cattapan, T., & Nantavisit, N. (2022). Determinants of perceived e-learning usefulness in higher education: A case of Thailand. Innovative Marketing, 18(4), 86–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.18(4).2022.08

Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42–78.

Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1

Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0420

Limbu, Y. B., & Pham, L. (2023). Impact of e-learning service quality on student satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 15(4), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2023.15.030

Lionello, R. L., Slongo, L. A., & de Matos, C. A. (2020). Electronic service quality: A meta-analysis. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 38(5), 619–635. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-06-2019-0340

Liu, C. C., Chen, W. C., & Chen, Y. T. (2024). Teachable Q&A agent: The effect of chatbot training on learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(6), 1083–1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241236467

Ma, W., Adesope, O. O., Nesbit, J. C., & Liu, Q. (2014). Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 901–918.

Maghsudi, S., Lan, A., Xu, J., & van der Schaar, M. (2021). Personalized education in the artificial intelligence era: What to expect next. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 38(3), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2021.3057879

Mai, D. T. T., Da, C. V., & Hanh, N. V. (2024). The use of ChatGPT in teaching and learning: A systematic review through SWOT analysis. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1328769. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1328769

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335

McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81

Meng, W., & Jia, W. (2024). A systematic review of the effectiveness of online learning in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1334153. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1334153

Murtaza, M., Ahmed, Y., Shamsi, J. A., Sherwani, F., & Usman, M. (2022). AI-based personalized e-learning systems: Issues, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Access, 10, 81323–81342. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3193938

Noor, N., Rao Hill, S., & Troshani, I. (2022). Developing a service quality scale for artificial intelligence service agents. European Journal of Marketing, 56(5), 1301–1336. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-09-2020-0672

Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y.-F. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing Science, 19(1), 22–42.

Okonkwo, C. W., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2021). Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033

Oliveira, W., Hamari, J., Joaquim, S., Toda, A. M., Palomino, P. T., Vassileva, J., & Isotani, S. (2022). The effects of personalized gamification on students’ flow experience, motivation, and enjoyment. Smart Learning Environments, 9(16). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00194-x

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670504271156

Pradeepa, N., Asokk, D., Prasanna, S., & Alam, A. S. (2024). Investigating chatbot users’ e-satisfaction and patronage intention through social presence and flow: Indian online travel agencies (OTAs). Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 26(1), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-04-2023-0062

Puriwat, W., & Tripopsakul, S. (2021). The impact of e-learning quality on student satisfaction and continuance usage intentions during COVID-19. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(8), 368–374. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.8.1536

Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2017). Flow in e-learning: What drives it and why it matters. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 899–915. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12480

Sumathy, V., & Navamani, G. (2024). AI-driven personalized learning: Enhancing student success through adaptive technologies. Library Progress International, 44(3), 16235–16242. https://doi.org/10.48165/bapas.2024.44.2.1

Sungkorn, S., & Thongmak, M. (2023). The study of game dynamics and community characteristics in the metaverse affecting brand engagement and brand loyalty. Creative Business and Sustainability Journal, 45(2), 42–65. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.CBSJ.45.2.3

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(15), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

Wang, F., Cheung, A. C. K., Neitzel, A. J., & Chai, C. S. (2024). Does chatting with chatbots improve language learning performance? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 94(4), 623–660. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241255621

Wolfinbarger, M., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). eTailQ: Dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting etail quality. Journal of Retailing, 79(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(03)00034-4

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Are the difficulties hindering adoption overshadowing the benefits? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zhou, R., Wang, X., Shi, Y., Zhang, R., Zhang, L., & Guo, H. (2018). Measuring e-service quality and its importance to customer satisfaction and loyalty: An empirical study in telecom. Electronic Commerce Research, 19(3), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-018-9301-3