Naresuan University Law Journal AI & Authorship Policy Guidelines on Generative AI Disclosure and Author Role Attribution Naresuan University Law Journal

Posted on 2026-08-31

Generative AI Policy

Naresuan University Law Journal is committed to maintaining standards of publication ethics, transparency, and academic integrity in legal studies. Accordingly, the policy on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) is established as follows:

1. Disclosure of Usage Authors must transparently disclose the details of any Generative AI tools used in preparing the manuscript under the section titled "Generative AI Declaration", placed immediately before the references list. Authors must specify the tool/platform name, version (if applicable), purpose of use, and the specific sections of the article where the tool was utilized.

2. Permitted Scope of Use Generative AI may be used as a supporting tool for the following purposes:

  • Language Editing and Refinement: Improving language quality and phrasing.

  • Content Summarization: Summarizing text material.

  • Translation: Translating statutory provisions or foreign documents. Authors must verify the accuracy against official original texts, as translation errors can alter legal meanings.

  • Formatting Tables and Legal Diagrams: Preparing tables, structural charts of laws, or legal process workflows.

  • Research Data Categorization: Assisting in categorizing research data.

  • Preliminary Legal Research Support: Assisting in preliminary legal research, such as identifying legal issues, searching for sources, suggesting search terms, summarizing judgments or documents, or exploring relevant perspectives and counterarguments. Results from AI serve merely as research assistance tools and are not legal authorities in themselves. Authors must personally access, verify, and evaluate original relevant sources before using such information or legal rules to support their legal analysis or conclusions.

3. Prohibited Scope of Use Generative AI must not be used to generate the primary substantive academic content of the article:

  • AI usage must not substitute for the author’s substantive intellectual contribution or independent legal judgment. Authors must personally develop, evaluate, and take full responsibility for the core legal analysis, arguments, proposals, and conclusions of the article.

  • Formulating academic stances, core conclusions, or policy recommendations.

  • Fabricating non-existent statutes, judicial decisions, or reference materials.

  • Inputting confidential data, personal data, restricted documents, non-public court documents, or information that the author has no legal right or authorization to process into Generative AI systems, unless backed by appropriate legal grounds or authorizations and accompanied by adequate confidentiality measures.

4. Responsibility and Accuracy Verification Because Generative AI outputs may contain inaccuracies or fabricate facts (AI Hallucination), authors bear direct duty and responsibility for verifying the accuracy, completeness, and reliability of all content, legal texts, judicial opinions/rulings, references, and legal arguments.

  • Citation Verification: Authors must strictly verify case citations and case numbers against official court databases or official institutional sources, as Generative AI frequently invents non-existent case titles or case numbers.

  • Original Source Verification: When using Generative AI to assist in searching, explaining, summarizing, or analyzing legal concepts, authors must verify such information against primary sources or reliable legal authority before incorporating it into the article.

  • Citation Standards: Authors must not cite Generative AI as a legal source, judicial authority, or scholarly proposal whenever primary original sources can be verified and cited.

5. Non-Authorship Prohibition Generative AI cannot be listed as a "Co-Author" of a manuscript, as it lacks legal standing to hold academic and ethical responsibility for the research.

6. Consequences of Non-Compliance If undisclosed use of Generative AI or usage exceeding the permitted scope under Section 3 is detected post-publication, the Editorial Board will take action according to the journal's publication ethics policy. Measures may include requesting a formal explanation from the author, issuing a Correction, or Retracting the article, depending on the severity of the case.

Generative AI Declaration Statements

  • If Generative AI was used:

"The author(s) utilized [Tool/Platform Name] to [Purpose, e.g., edit language / translate text / summarize content] in the [Section of article, e.g., Abstract / Introduction]. The author(s) have verified and assume full responsibility for the accuracy of all content."

  • If Generative AI was not used:

"The author(s) did not use Generative AI in the preparation of this manuscript."