Civil liability for damage caused by community dogs

Authors

  • เฉลิมวุฒิ ศรีพรหม มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์

Keywords:

community dogs, delictual liability, compensation

Abstract

                    This article aims to study the legal problem of delictual liability for the damage caused by community dogs. The community dog is stray dog which stays close to people particularly and causes many problems as people suffers damage caused by the dog. Since the community dog is ownerless, in legal aspect, it raises the problem of who shall be liable for the damage.

                     In terms of such question, this article studied the delictual liability of three groups including (1) those who regularly feed the community dogs,(2) former owners who abandoned their dog sin public area and (3) local administrative organizations whose administrative area is the place the dogs lives. According to the analysis, these groups were found not guilty pursuant to Section433, Civil and Commercial Code as they were not an owner or caretaker of the dogs.

                     Nevertheless, pursuant to Section420, Civil and Commercial Code, these groups could be guilty of certain cases as follows. (1)Those who regularly feed the community dogs could be liable in case they excite or provoke those dogs to cause damage to other people. (2) The former owners who abandoned their dogs in public area could be liable in case they know or foresee that the abandoned dogs will inflict harm to people. (3) The local administrative organizations could be liable for damages in case they fail to exercise their duties stipulated by specific laws concerning the control of stray dog sin public areas as they know or fore see that the abandoned dogs will inflict harm to public.

Author Biography

เฉลิมวุฒิ ศรีพรหม, มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์

Lecturer of the Center of Civil Law, Faculty of Law, Thammasat University, Thailand

References

1. Alaskan Village, Inc. v. Smalley, for and on Behalf of Smalley.720 P.2d
945, 948 (Alaska, 1986) at [947]-[948] [Online]. Available from: ฐานข้อมูลออนไลน์ Westlaw Next. Retrieved 22 August 2018.

2. Bangkokbiznews. (2018). People who are exposed to rabies can requestreimbursement from Social Security Fund [Online]. Available from: https://www.bangkokbiznews.com/news/detail/795053 Retrieved 22 August 2018.

3. Civil and Commercial Code.

4. Cruelty Prevention and Welfare of Animals Act, B.E. 2557(2014).

5. Dailynews. (2018). Who will be responsible for dog bite? [Online]. Available from:
https://www.dailynews.co.th Retrieved 22 August 2018.

6. Jid Setthabutr. (2013). Principles of Civil Law on Torts. 8th Edition. Bangkok: Project of Textbooks and Documents Used in Teaching, Faculty of Law, Thammasat University.

7. Jitti Tingsabadh. (2012). Commentaries of the Civil and Commercial Codeon Torts, Management of Affairs without Mandate, and Undue Enrichment (Sections 395-452). Revised by KhemapoomBhumithavara.

8. ChawinOunpat. and AmnartTangkiriphimarn. Bangkok: Duen Tula Publishing House.

9. Khaosod. (2017). A vendor was bitten by a dangerous dog named ‘James’, resulting in serious injury [Online]. Available from: https://www.khaosod.co.th /around thailand/news_670482 Retrieved 22 August 2018.

10. Khaosod. (2018). A 5-year-old girl almost loses her arm after being hit byThree Straydogs(Clip) [Online]. Available from: https://www.khaosod.co.th/around-thailand/news_874207 Retrieved 22 August 2018.

11. MN ST § 347.22 [Online]. Available from: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/Statutes/cite/347.22 Retrieved 22 August 2018.

12. PPTV. (2017). Dog – cat owners should be aware of their pets running away because of being frightened by firework displays in New Year’s Eve [Online]. Available from: https://www.pptvhd36.com Retrieved 22 August 2018.

13. Sanankorn Sodthiphan.(2017). Explanation of the Law of Torts, Management of Affairs without Mandate, and Undue Enrichment.7th Edition. Bangkok: Winyuchon.

14. Seni Pramoj. (B.E.2559). Civil and Commercial Code on Juristic Acts and Obligations Part 1 (Parts 1-2). Revised by MuninPongsapan. Bangkok: Winyuchon.

15. Municipalities Act. B.E. 2496 (1953)

16. Ordinance of Bangkok Metropolis on Control of Keeping or Dumping Dogs. B.E. (2548) 2005.

17. Public Health Act. B.E. 2535 (1992).

18. Rabies Act. B.E.2535 (1992).

Downloads

Published

2018-12-11

How to Cite

ศรีพรหม เฉลิมวุฒิ. “Civil liability for damage caused by community dogs”. Law and Local Society Journal 2, no. 2 (December 11, 2018): 187–214. accessed April 21, 2025. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/llsj/article/view/147972.

Issue

Section

Academic Article