Illegitimate Succession of Political Power
Keywords:
The succession of political power, Coup d’etat, Seize the powerAbstract
The succession of political power in Thailand has begun since the Siamese revolution of 1932. The revolutionary government had succeeded power for 25 years. Until, Field Marshal Sarit Thanarat seized power in coup d’etat in 1957. Subsequently, Field Marshal Thanom Kittikachon was succeeded power for the next 16 years from Field Marshal Sarit Thanarat, until Day of Great Sorrow took place on 14th October, 1973.
After the incident on 14th October, 1973, then Thailand government promulgated the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, B.E. 2517 (1974) by which Thailand seemed to became the complete democracy, but another violent incident broke out on 6th October 1976. The military had taken a coup to set up a civilian government, with Mr. Thanin Kraivichien as Prime Minister and a plan to seize power for up to 12 years. However, after one year of the administration, the government was toppled and the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, B.E. 2521 (1978) was promulgated. Politicians stepped in to gained power and committed corruption widely by which the military coup was staged a gain in February1991. After that, the election took place in March, 1992 and General Suchinda Kraprayoonservedas Prime Minister. The protest was sparked over the alleged succession of political power, until the1992 Black May took place and led to a demand for political reform. To solve these problems, the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, B.E. 2540 (1997). Politicians exploited the legal loophole of the Constitution to succeed political power, which was the cause of the coup in 2006. Later in 2014, the coup d’etat council set up the Constitution Drafting Committee, which promulgated the Constitution on 6th April 2017. It seems this Constitution will facilitate the succession of political power of Military Corps through political process. Finally, Thailand will have a political problem like the past.
References
2. Administrative Charter of the Kingdom. (1972). the government gazette. 89 (Special Issue 192 Kor).
3. Administrative Charter of the Kingdom. (1991). the government gazette. 108 (Special Issue 40 Kor).
4. Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (interim). (2006). the government gazette. 123 (Issue 102Kor).
5. Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (interim). (2014). the government gazette.131 (Special Issue 55Kor).
6. Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand. (1991). the government gazette.108 (Special Issue 216Kor).
7. Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand. (2007). the government gazette. 124 (Issue 47Kor).
8. Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand. (2017). the government gazette. 134 (Issue 40Kor).
9. Kanok Wongtrangan. (1984). Politics in Thailand Democracy(Research No. 6).Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
10. Mark and F. Enqels. (1967). Communist Manifesto.A.J.P.Taylor (editor). Harmonds worth. Middlesex. Penguin
11. Nakhorn Phannarong. (1983). History of Thonburi and Rattanakosin. Bangkok: Ganesh.
12. Parliament Dissolution Royal Decree.(1983). the government gazette. 100 (Special Issue 30 Kor).
13. Parliament Dissolution Royal Decree.(1984). the government gazette. 103 (Special Issue 73Kor).
14. Sawang Lanleau. (1972). 37 Years of Bangkok’s Coup D’état. Bangkok: Ramkhamhaeng University.
15. Siri Premjit. US History from Ancient to Modern Era. Bangkok: PraePittaya.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles published are copyright of local law and society journals. Faculty of Law Surat Thani Rajabhat University
Content and information in articles published in local law and society journals It is the opinion and responsibility of the author of the article directly. which the journal editor It is not necessary to agree or share any responsibility for articles, information, content, images, etc. published in local law and society journals. It is the copyright of the local jurisprudence journal. If any person or entity wants to distribute all or part of it or to take any action must have prior written permission from the local jurisprudence journal only.