Trends of Thailand’s Economics 4.0 in Digital Economic Era: From Geopolitics Risk to Geo-Economic Dilemma by Superpowers

Main Article Content

Pisan Amornratananuparp

Abstract

Geopolitical Risks can be categorized as a malevolent force that has been a driver of political, economic, military, and social systems amongst countries, and emerge from a nation's involvement in international affairs. Furthermore, the Geopolitical Risks can also be the risks that disruptive economic growth will be existed thereafter. It is empirical as in the late 20th century, the old powers (Ruling Power) conflicted with the new powers (Rising Power), the United States and China respectively. The old power which is the United States must take steps to thwart rival nations known as the New Power which is China, especially China's apparent desire to set up “a New World Order”. In the digital economy world 4.0 era (Fourth Industrial Revolution), such conflict has affected Thailand through the geopolitical conflict enacted by the superpowers. Since both are trading partners that are centered on the growth of the country regarding stability and economy, which Thailand is in the supply chain system (Supply Chain Effect). Therefore, it is necessary that the Balance of Power theory should be implemented, that is to say the maintaining of relation equality with all superpowers and for the disengaging from the supply chain. The Production Process and Product should be implemented for that of the product compliance enable to meet with the demand amongst consumers, ready to be marketed in which encompass innovation and modern technology. Thailand should launch the policy on induced investment from multinational corporation and the human resources should be ongoing developed for the highly qualified and modernized merchandises which will be the key mechanism for New Growth Engines of the country.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิชาการ (Academic Article)

References

คณะที่ปรึกษาด้านข่าวกรอง. (2564). การประเมินกำลังอำนาจของชาติ (National Power) และภัยคุกคามรูปแบบใหม่. วารสารมุมมองด้านความมั่นคง, (7), 5-16.

จุฑาทิพย์ จงวนิชย์. (2566, 22 มิถุนายน). สงครามการค้าระหว่างสหรัฐกับจีน : การเดินหน้าของประเทศไทย. กรุงเทพธุรกิจ. สืบค้นเมื่อ 31 ตุลาคม 2566, จาก https://www.bangkokbiznews.com/business/economic/1074865

พิศาล อมรรัตนานุภาพ. (2566). การนำทฤษฎีเชิงอำนาจมาประยุกต์ใช้กับสถานการณ์ในปัจจุบัน. วารสารมุมมองด้านความมั่นคง, (12).

ศูนย์วิจัยกสิกรไทย. (2566). จีนเปิดประเทศเร็ว GDP ไทย ปี 2566 คาดปรับขึ้นมาอยู่ที่ 3.7%. สืบค้นเมื่อ 31 ตุลาคม 2566, จาก https://www.kasikornresearch.com/th/analysis/k-social-media/Pages/GDP-FB-16-01-2023.aspx

สุวิทย์ เมษินทรีย์. (2559). แนวคิดเกี่ยวกับประเทศไทย 4.0. สืบค้นเมื่อ 25 สิงหาคม 2566, จาก http://planning2. mju.ac.th/goverment/20111119104835_planning/Doc_25590823143652_358135.pdf

Agilität. (2020). BANI versus VUCA: a new acronym to describe the world. Retrieved from https:// stephangrabmeier.de/bani-versus-vuca/#infographic

Dalio, R. (2021). The Changing World Order. New York: Avid Reader Press.

Dodds, K. (2019). Geopolitics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kraaijenbink, J. (2022). What BANI Really Means (And How It Corrects Your World View). Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sited/jeroenkraaijenbrink/2022/06/22/what-bani-really-means-and-how-it-corrects-your-world-view/?sh=6a87972011bb

Krickovic, A. (2017). The Symbiotic China-Russia Partnership: Cautious Riser and Desperate Challenger. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 10(3), 299-329.

Mazouz, A., Alnaji, L., Jeljeli, R., & Al-Shdaifat, F. (2019). Innovotion and entrepreneurship framework within the middle East and North Africa region. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 11(6), 699-710.

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.

Nye, J. S., Jr. (2005). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs Books.

Valenti, A. (2021). What is Smart Power?. Retrieved October 30, 2023 from https://jeuneurope.com/what-is-smart-power/

Vuving, A. (2020). Hindsight, Insight, Foresight: Thinking About Security in the Indo-Pacific. Honolulu: Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies.

World Economic Forum. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What it Means, How to Respond. Retrieved April 24, 2023 from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/

_______. (2019). How a Trade War Would Impact Global Growth. Retrieved April 24, 2023 from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/01/how-trade-war-would-impact-global-growth-tariff/