“Khon Chiang Khong” Local Curriculum and Extending the Boundary of Citizenship in Border

Main Article Content

วสันต์ สรรพสุข

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate and analyze whether citizenship advocacy existed within the local curriculum of a school in Thailand – Lao PDR border, Chiang Khong District, Chiang Rai Province. The researcher selected the Koraratwittaya School (pseudonym), Chiang Khong District, Chiang Rai Province as a research study and applied qualitative data collection and analysis methods. The data was obtained from 1) documentation; the local curriculum of “Khon Chiang Khong,” also known as the indigenous Chiang Khong people and 2) field research; observations and semi-structured interviews. I also used a purposive sampling technique to select key informants as follows: three teachers, with one representative from the Civil Society Organization (CSO), and nine students.  The data collection was from October 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020. The researcher applied the theory of cultural citizenship by Renato Rosaldo (1994) as a conceptual lens to analyze. I uncovered that the “Khon Chiang Khong” local curriculum epitomized the ideology of citizenship as the people of Chiang Khong” or “Khon Chiang Khong,” which means the Chiang Khong native people.  They together possessed their sense of membership to the local culture on the basis of human interaction, natural resources, and the superstition regarding the Khong River.  This corresponded to curriculum practices that emphasized flexibility of curriculum, approaches, and diverse locations as well as teachers’ reproduction of ideologies. In the interim, the curriculum created space and empowered students to perceive themselves as the multicultural citizens. They also regarded themselves as the members who developed a collective consciousness in the local community or village and retained their ethnicity, kinship, and the identity of “Khon Chiang Khong.” Nonetheless, the practices of the local curriculum were still facing a challenge with the school culture that was often tied to the ideology of state citizenship.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Althusser, L. (2014). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Kaewthep, K., Trans). Bangkok: Text. (in Thai)
Apple, M. W. (2013). Knowledge, Power, and Education: The Selected Works of Michael W. Apple. New York: Routledge.
Buadaeng, C. (2007). State Education Development in Hill Tribe Community. Chiang Mai: Center for Ethnic Studies and Development, Social Research Institute, Chiang Mai University. (in Thai)
Buadaeng, C. (2013). Children of Migrant Labors from Myanmar: Education and Cross Border Identity. in Suchada Thaweesit (Editor), Citizenship in Globalization (pp. 124-155). Bangkok: Thai Health Promotion Foundation. (in Thai)
Chantavanich, S. (2012). Qualitative Research (20th ed.) Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)
Fernandez, J. S. (2015). Latina/o Youth Cultural Citizenship: Re-Conceptualizing Dominant Constructions of Citizenship through Membership, Sense of Belonging, Claiming Space and Rights. Santa Cruz: Ph.D. Dissertation (Latin American & Latino Studies), University of California, Santa Cruz.
Ganjanapan, A. (2008). Multicultural in Transformative Social and Cultural Context. in Proceeding of “Nationalism and Multiculturalism” Conference. Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University. (in Thai)
Jatuporn, O., & Wattanatorn, A. (2014). Paradigms and Ideologies in Curriculum Development: From Scientific Management to Emancipatory Paradigm. Journal of Education Studies, 42 (3), 160-174. (in Thai)
Koraratwittaya School (pseudonym). (2017). Local Curriculum Framework: “Kon Chiang Khong”. Chiang Rai: Social Studies, Religion and Culture Department, Ban Rim Khong School. (in Thai)
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Clarendon Press.
Leepreecha, P. (2013). (Editorial) Multiculturalism: Meaning, Paradigm and Status. Journal of Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University, 25(2), 7-27. (in Thai)
McLaren, P. (1998). Life in Schools: Introduction to Critical Pedagogy in the Foundations of Education (3th ed.). New York: Longman.
Pipatpen, M. (2004). The Inclusion of Local Wisdom into Thai Schooling System. Ed.D. (Development Education). Bangkok: Graduate School, Srinakharinwirot University. (in Thai)
Podhisita, C. (2016). The Art and Science in the Qualitative Research (7th edition). Bangkok: Amarin Printing. (in Thai)
Preechasinlapakun, S. (2011). 100 Years of Thai Nationality, Past 1. Vibhasa Magazine, 5(5),16-44. (in Thai)
Rosaldo, R. (1994). Cultural Citizenship and Educational Democracy. Cultural Anthropology, 9(3), 402-411.
Rosaldo, R. (1994a). Cultural Citizenship in San Jose, California. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 17(2), 57-64.
Sapphasuk, W. (2019). Cultural Citizenship Construction in Thailand – Lao PDR Border School. Chiang Mai: Doctor of Philosophy (Education), Graduate School, Chiang Mai University.
Sapphasuk, W., & Nawarat, N. (2019). New Actors and Space Contestation for Ideology Representation in a Thai-Laos Border School: A Case Study of Chiang Rai Province. MFU Connexion: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(2), 87-106.
Seeneang, N., Nakhonthap, A., & Satjakul, K. (2013). Synthesis of Local Knowledge Sets for the Promotion of Community Education. Journal of Behavioral Science, 19(1),133-154. (in Thai)
Siwarom, S. (2008). Social Science of Education. Chiang Mai: Sangsan. (in Thai)
Thanosawan, A. (2002). Formal Education: Exercising Power through Knowledge and Designating Village Communities to be the Other. Bangkok: Ed.D. (Development Education). Bangkok: Graduate School, Srinakharinwirot University. (in Thai)