ANALYSIS OF SATISFACTION AND CONTINUANCE INTENTION OF POSTGRADUATES TOWARD ONLINE DESIGN LEARNING IN CHENGDU, CHINA
Keywords:
System Quality, Service Quality, Information Quality, Satisfaction, Continuance IntentionAbstract
In this study, 495 graduate students majoring in art from four public universities in Chengdu, China, were surveyed about their satisfaction and intention to continue their studies. The researchers used online traditional craft learning as a scenario and combined the TAM and ISS models. The sampling method involves judgmental, quota and convenience sampling. Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Model were used to establish the association between study variables through quantitative research. The model and hypothesis were validated using SPSS and AMOS tools. According to research findings, user satisfaction and perceived usefulness are directly connected with students’ propensity to use online design education consistently. As a result, to support the long-term growth of traditional craft design education, teachers and teaching management departments in online design education should concentrate on helping students recognize the value of their knowledge and skills and enhance the service quality of online teaching in numerous ways.
References
Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2017). Investigating the Effect of Learning Styles in a Blended E-Learning System: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2741
Alexander, M. W., Truell, A. D., & Zhao, J. J. (2012). Expected Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Learning: Perceptions from College Students who have not Taken Online Courses. Issues in Information Systems, 13(2),193–200. https://doi.org/10.48173/jev.v1i2.54
Amoroso, D. L., & Chen, Y. A. (2017). Constructs Affecting Continuance Intention in Consumers with Mobile Financial Apps: A Dual Factor Approach, Journal of Information Technology Management, 28(3), 1042-1319.
Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On The Evaluation of Structural Equation Models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02723327
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. (2020). Emergency Remote Teaching in a Time of Global Crisis due to Corona Virus Pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education,15(1),1–6.
Budu, K. W. A., Yinping, M., & Mireku, K. K. (2018). Investigating the Effect of Behavioral Intention on E-Learning Systems Usage: Empirical Study on Tertiary Education Institutions in Ghana. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 9(3), 201-216. https://doi.org/10.2478/mjss-2018-0062
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Multivariate Applications Series. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor &Francis Group.
Chang, C. C. (2013). Exploring the Determinants of E-Learning Systems Continuance Intention in Academic Libraries. Library Management, 34(1/2), 40-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121311298261
Chauhan, S. (2015). Acceptance of Mobile Money by Poor Citizens of India: Integrating Trust into The Technology Acceptance Model. Info, 17(3), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1108/info-02-2015-0018
Chen, H. J. (2010). Linking Employees’ E-Learning System Use to Their Overall Job Outcomes: An Empirical Study Based on the IS Success Model. Computers and Education, 55(4), 1628-1639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.005
Cheng, Y.-M. (2014). Extending the expectation-confirmation model with quality and flow to explore nurses' continued blended e-learning intention. Information Technology & People, 27(3), 230-258. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-01-2013-0024
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion Adoption Study. Information Systems Research, 14(2),189-217. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018
Chiu, C.-M., Sun, S.-Y., Sun, P.-C., & Ju, T. L. (2007). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of web-based learning continuance. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1224-1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.010
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13, 319 -340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online Learning in Higher Education: Exploring Advantages and Disadvantages for Engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1),39-50.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
Hair, J. F., Celsi, M. W., Oritinau, D. J., & Bush, R. P. (2013). Essentials of Marketing Research (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. Educause View, 11(7), 1-10.
Hsu, M. H., & Chiu, C. M. (2004). Predicting Electronic Service Continuance with A Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviors. Behaviors and Information Technology, 23(5), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290410001669969
Hu, C., Cheng, Y., Hu, W. F., & Luo, A. J. (2014). Sustainable Development of Online Higher Education: Current Situation, Problems and Countermeasures. The Chinese's Journal of ICT In Education,7, 9-13.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Islam, A. Y. M. A. (2011). Viability of the Extended Technology Acceptance Model: An Empirical Study. Journal of ICT, 10, 85-98.
Jamal, A., & Naser, K. (2003). Factors influencing customer satisfaction in the retail banking sector in Pakistan. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 13(2), 29-53.
Kenny, D. A., & Kashy, D. A. (1992). Analysis of the multitrait-multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 165-172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.165
Kim, S. S., & Malhotra, N. (2005). A Longitudinal Model of Continued IS Use: An Integrative View of Four Mechanisms Underlying Post-Adoption Phenomena. Management Science, 51(5), 741-755. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0326
Lee, B.-C., Yoon, J.-O., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners’ Acceptance Of E-Learning in South Korea: Theories and Results. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1320-1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.014
Liang, J.-C., Wu, S.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). Nurses’ Internet Self-Efficacy and Attitudes toward Web-Based Continuing Learning. Nurse Education Today, 31(8), 768-773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.11.021
Lwoga, E. T. (2013). Measuring The Success of Library 2.0 Technologies in the African Context: The Suitability of the DeLone and Mclean’s Mode. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 30(4), 288-307.
Mckechnie, S., Winklhofer, H., & Ennew, C. (2006). Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to the Online Retailing of Financial Services. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 34(4/5), 388-410. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550610660297
Mckinney, V., Yoon, K., & Zahedi, F. (2002). The Measurement of Web Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 296-315. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.296.76
Mohammad, K. A., Amro, A.-M., Mohammad, H. A. K., & Adiy, A. T. (2020). Determinants of Virtual Classroom Adoption in Jordan: The Case of Princess Samaya University for Technology. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 45, 359-374.
Moshagen, M. (2012). The Model Size Effect in SEM: Inflated Goodness-of-Fit Statistics are due to the Size of the Covariance Matrix. Structural Equation Modeling a Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(1), 86-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.634724
Mtebe, J. S., & Raphael, C. (2018). Key factors in learners' satisfaction with the e-learning system at the University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2993
Nelson, E., Leibenluft, E., Tone, E. B., & Pine, D. S. (2015). The social re-orientation of adolescence: A neuroscience perspective on the process and its relation to psychopathology. Psychological Medicine, 35(2), 163-74. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291704003915
Ojo, A. I. (2017). Validation of the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model. Healthcare Informatics Research, 23(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2017.23.1.60
Panigyrakis, G. G., & Chatzipanagiotou, K. C. (2006). The Impact of Design Characteristics and Support Services on the Effectiveness of Marketing Information Systems: An Empirical Investigation. Review of Business Information Systems, 10(2), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.19030/rbis.v10i2.5328
Ranganathan, C., & Ganapathy, S. (2002). Key Dimensions of Business-to-Consumer Web Sites, Information & Management, 39(6), 457-65.
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., & Goodyear, P., Guadia, L., & Koole, M. (2021). Balancing Technology, Pedagogy and the New Normal: Post-pandemic Challenges for Higher Education. Postdigital Science and Education, 3, 715–742.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1
Ritanjali, P., Praveen, R. S., & Prabin, K. P. (2019). Effectiveness of E-Learning: The Mediating Role of Student Engagement on Perceived Learning Effectiveness. Information Technology & People, 34(7), 1840-1862.
Roca, J. C., Chiu, C.-M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003
Roca, J. C., & Gagne, M. (2008). Understanding E-Learning Continuance Intention in the Workplace: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective, Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4),1585-1604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.001
Rui-Hsin, K., & Lin, C. (2018). The Usage Intention of E-Learning for Police Education and Training. Policing an International Journal of Police Strategies and Management., 41(1), 98-112. https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-10-2016-0157
Santos, J. (2003). E-service Quality: A Model of Virtual Service Quality Dimensions, Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 13(3), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520310476490
Shih, H.-P. (2004). An Empirical Study on Predicting User Acceptance of E-Shopping on the Web. Information and Management, 41, 351-368.
Shneiderman, B. (2010). Designing the User Interface: strategies for Effective Human-computer Interaction (1st ed.). Pearson Education India. https://doi.org/10.1145/25065.950626
Sica, C., & Ghisi, M. (2007). The Italian Versions of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory-II: Psychometric Properties and Discriminant Power. In M. A. Lange (Ed.), Leading - Edge Psychological Tests and Testing Research (pp. 27-50). Nova.
Soujata, R.-S., & Zuberia, A. H. (2021). An Evaluation of the Impact of Confinement on the Quality of E-Learning in Higher Education Institutions. Quality Assurance in Education, 29(4), 422-444.
Stein, C., Morris, N., & Nock, N. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling. In R. Elstone, J., Satagopan, & S. Sun (Eds.), Statistical Human Genetics: Methods and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology (1st ed.). Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7274-6_28
Sudin, B., Payel, A., & Md, A. I. (2022). Behavioral Intention of “Digital Natives” Toward Adapting the Online Education System in Higher Education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education,14(1), 16-40.
Tiene, D. (2000). Online Discussions: A Survey of Advantages and Disadvantages Compared to Face-to-Face Discussions. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 369–382.
Timothy, A. B., & Michael, T. M. (2012). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (1st ed). Department of Psychology.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Wang, Y.-S. (2003). Assessment of Learner Satisfaction with Asynchronous Electronic Learning. Information and Management Journal, 41(1) ,75-86.
Yakubu, M. N., & Dasuki, S. (2018). Assessing eLearning Systems Success in Nigeria: An Application of the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 183-203. https://doi.org/10.28945/4077
Yang, Z., Cai, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Zhou, N. (2005). Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting Web portals. Information & Management, 42(4), 575-589.
Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2000). Services Marketing Strategy. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444316568.wiem01055
Zhang, K., Min, Q., Liu, Z., & Liu, Z. (2016). Understanding microblog continuance usage intention: an integrated model. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(6), 772-792. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-03-2016-0025
Zhou, R., & Feng, C. (2017). Difference Between Leisure and Work Contexts: The Roles of Perceived Enjoyment and Perceived Usefulness in Predicting Mobile Video Calling Use Acceptance. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(10), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00350
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Suvarnabhumi Institute of Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารวิชาการ สถาบันเทคโนโลยีแห่งสุวรรณภูมิ
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับสถาบันเทคโนโลยีแห่งสุวรรณภูมิ และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆในสถาบันฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว