Managerial guidelines of landscape architecture education in higher education under Henan Province

Authors

  • Mi Wenjing Graduate student, Philosophy of Education, Leadership in Educational Administration program
  • Sutida Howattanakul Faculty of Education, Bangkokthonburi University
  • Vorachai Viphoouparakhot Faculty of Education, Bangkokthonburi University

Keywords:

Educational management, landscape architecture

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the components of landscape architecture education management in higher education institutions in Henan Province, China, and to propose managerial guidelines for improving its quality and effectiveness. A mixed-methods design was used. In the quantitative phase, 364 instructors and administrators were selected through stratified random sampling from 7,066 personnel at 10 higher education institutions offering landscape architecture programs. Data were collected using a five-point rating-scale questionnaire and analyzed with descriptive statistics and exploratory factor analysis. In the qualitative phase, data from in-depth interviews with 16 key informants and a focus group discussion with 11 experts were analyzed using content analysis. The findings identified seven components of landscape architecture education management: 1) teaching theory requirements, 2) teaching practice and application, 3) teaching objectives and social needs, 4) learning atmosphere, 5) evaluation criteria, 6) resource development, and 7) innovation and development. Based on these components, 16 managerial guidelines were developed to strengthen curriculum relevance, practical learning, supportive learning environments, assessment systems, resource development, and educational innovation in higher education institutions in Henan Province.

References

Chen, Y. (2019). Research on the development of modern landscape design development.Publisher.

Jia, S. (2017). Landscape design. Publisher.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Kingsbury, N. (2019). Integration of landscape design education management and nature. Publisher.

Li, J. (2020). Opportunities and misunderstandings of urban landscaping construction in China.Publisher.

Li, Q. (2017). An analysis of Chinese classical landscape architecture. Publisher.

Li, R. (2022). Explored the reform of blended teaching model based on humanistic teaching concept: Taking the course of landscape architecture design. Publisher.

Lin, G. (2014). Landscape architecture design research teaching model. Publisher.

Liu, B. (2021a). Landscape engineering system. Publisher.

Liu, B. (2021b). Modern landscape planning and design. Publisher.

Liu, B. (2022). Major changes and countermeasures of the discipline of Chinese landscape architecture planning and design. Publisher.

McGraw, P. (2022). New York's storefront for art and architecture's 40th birthday. Publisher.

Pang, W. (2018). The development history of the world landscape design. Publisher.

Song, S. (2018). External space design. Publisher.

Wang, X. (2017). Innovation in teaching management goals. Publisher.

Xing, L. (2020). The diversity of educational models of landscape design. Publisher.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

Wenjing, M., Howattanakul, S., & Viphoouparakhot, V. (2026). Managerial guidelines of landscape architecture education in higher education under Henan Province. APHEIT International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences and Technology, 15(1), 85–97. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ATI/article/view/287561

Issue

Section

Research article