The Influence of Media Exposure and Parasocial Interaction on Perceived Political Authenticity and Political Efficacy among Thai Citizens

Authors

  • Peerawat Tan-intaraarj Student in Master of Communication Arts in Communication Innovation for Political and Local Administration, School of Communication Arts, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2572-0579
  • Supaporn Sridee School of Communication Arts, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University
  • Karn Boonsiri School of Communication Arts, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University

Keywords:

Political Party, Media Exposure, Parasocial Interaction, Political Authenticity Perception, Political Efficacy

Abstract

This study aimed to 1) examine Thai citizens’ media exposure, parasocial interaction, perceived political authenticity, and political efficacy regarding political parties, and 2) investigate the influence of media exposure and parasocial interaction on perceived political authenticity and political efficacy. The sample consisted of 400 Thai citizens aged 18 and above who followed political news. Data were collected using questionnaires and analyzed with descriptive statistics, simple linear regression, multiple regression, and hierarchical regression. The results indicated that media exposure alone did not significantly predict parasocial interaction, whereas parasocial interaction strongly influenced all three dimensions of perceived political authenticity: ordinariness, consistency, and immediacy. Moreover, media exposure combined with parasocial interaction and perceived political authenticity predicted citizens’ political efficacy. The findings suggest that parasocial interaction plays a critical role in shaping Thai citizens’ understanding and confidence in political matters, while media exposure alone has limited impact. This research provides insights into the role of media and parasocial interaction in political communication and can inform future strategies for political party communication.

References

Akinola, O. A., Omar, B., & Mustapha, L. K. (2022). Corruption in the limelight: The relative influence of traditional mainstream and social media on political trust in Nigeria. International Journal of Communication, 16, 22.

Balaban, D. C., & Szambolics, J. (2022). A proposed model of self-perceived authenticity of social media influencers. Media and Communication, 10(1), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4765

Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: toward a developmental Theory of Interpersonal Communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x

Boulianne, S. (2019). Building faith in democracy: Deliberative events, political trust and efficacy. Political Studies, 67(1), 4-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718761466

Boulianne, S., & Ohme, J. (2022). Pathways to environmental activism in four countries: social media, environmental concern, and political efficacy. Journal of Youth Studies, 25(6), 771-792. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2021.2011845

DataReportal (2023, February 13). Digital 2023: Thailand. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-thailand

Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper and Row.

Graf, M. (2022). The Bipartisan Media Strategy: How Three Ideologically Different Candidates Found Success. Comm-entary, 18(1), 10.

Hannapha, P. (2021). Political Marketing Communication of the Future Forward Party in Thailand General Election 2019. Suan Dusit Graduate School Academic Journal, 17(2), 37–52.

Hassan, M. S., Ridzuan, A. R., A’zmi, A. A., Chaniago, R. H., & Allam, S. N. S. (2021). Social media use and political efficacy: structural effect of the voting decision of new voters. Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(6), 1827-1841. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i6/10205

Hoewe, J., & Sherrill, L. A. (2019). The influence of female lead characters in political TV shows: Links to political engagement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(1), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1570782

Holtz-Bacha, C. (2022). Strategic Political Authenticity: How Populists Construct an Authentic Image. In Cultures of Authenticity (pp. 273-285). Emerald Publishing Limited.

Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 19(3), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049

Ibenskas, R., & Polk, J. (2022). Party responsiveness to public opinion in young democracies. Political Studies, 70(4), 919-938. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321721993635

Kestilä-Kekkonen, E., Koivula, A., & Tiihonen, A. (2022). When trust is not enough. A longitudinal analysis of political trust and political competence during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland. European Political Science Review, 14(3), 424-440. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773922000224

Kiousis, S., Bantimaroudis, P., & Ban, H. (1999). Candidate image attributes: Experiments on the substantive dimension of second level agenda setting. Communication Research, 26(4), 414-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026004003

Ko, H. C. (2024). Factors affecting continued purchase intention in live streaming shopping: parasocial relationships and shared communication networks. Behaviour & Information Technology, 43(11), 2488-2510. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2252099

Kushin, M. J., & Yamamoto, M. (2010). Did social media really matter? College students' use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. Mass communication and society, 13(5), 608-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2010.516863

Luebke, S. M., & Engelmann, I. (2023). Perceiving politicians as true to themselves: Development and validation of the perceived political authenticity scale. Plos one, 18(5), e0285344. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285344

Patllollu, R. (2023). The Presence of Political Parasocial Interaction in the Websites of US Senators. Journal of Student Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i1.3877

Rosenblum, M., Schroeder, J., & Gino, F. (2020). Tell it like it is: When politically incorrect language promotes authenticity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(1), 75-103. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000206

Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x

Rubin, R. B., & McHugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31(3), 279-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158709386664

Slothuus, R., & Bisgaard, M. (2021). How political parties shape public opinion in the real world. American Journal of Political Science, 65(4), 896-911. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12550

Taillon, B. J., Mueller, S. M., Kowalczyk, C. M., & Jones, D. N. (2020). Understanding the relationships between social media influencers and their followers: the moderating role of closeness. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(6), 767-782. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-03-2019-2292

Tan-intaraarj, P. (2024). Influences of media exposure, interpersonal attraction, and parasocial interaction on political self-efficacy and voting intentions in the 2023 Thai general election. Phuket Rajabhat University Academic Journal, 20(2), 16-37.

Tan-intaraarj, P. (2021, May). Celebrities Influence Public Opinion: Applying Celebrity Political Endorsement through Meaning Transfer Theory. In DPU International Conference on Business Innovation and Social Sciences 2021 (pp. 124-131). Dhurakij Pundit University.

Tan-intaraarj, P., & Pornsakulvanich, V. (2021). The study of Japanese Idol in Thailand: The impact of interpersonal attraction and parasocial interaction on parasocial relationships and attitude homophily. Journal of Communication and Management NIDA (e-Journal), 7(3), 1-19.

Tangprasert, S. (2022). Strategies and comparison in political communication through social media of Thai political parties in Thailand’s General Elections 2019. Journal of Political Science Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, 5(1), 25-38.

Thai PBS. (2023, May 25). Election 2023: “Political fandom” A new character in Thai politics [in Thai]. https://www.thaipbs.or.th/news/content/328185

Um, N. (2022). Impact of Parasocial Interaction, Perceived Ad Message Authenticity, and Match-Up between Brand and Celebrity in Evaluation of Instagram Celebrity-Based Brand Endorsement. Sustainability, 14(5), 2928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052928

Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: an introductory analysis (3rd ed.). Harper and Row Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-24

How to Cite

Tan-intaraarj, P., Sridee, S. ., & Boonsiri, K. . (2026). The Influence of Media Exposure and Parasocial Interaction on Perceived Political Authenticity and Political Efficacy among Thai Citizens. STOU Academic Journal of Research and Innovation (Humanities and Social Science) , 6(2), 156–167. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/InnovationStou/article/view/282408

Issue

Section

Research Articles