Design Supervision: Innovative Supervision to Creatively Solve Problems in Teaching and Learning Management Process
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The National Education Plan for the years 2560 – 2579 (B.E. 2017 – 2036) discusses the development of the efficiency of the educational management system within the 6th strategy. It emphasizes the importance of supervision in developing the teaching and learning management process. However, based on the results of the PISA assessment from the year B.E. 2543 (2000) to B.E. 2561 (2018), Thai students' competencies in reading, mathematics, and science have consistently declined. As a result, schools have to place importance on supervision to improve teachers' capabilities. One of the innovative supervision approaches is "Design Supervision" which consists of 5 steps: 1) Empathize: Understanding the needs of teachers and students 2) Define: Identifying and defining the issues or problems 3) Ideate: Generating creative ideas and potential solutions 4) Prototype: Creating a prototype or model of the proposed solution and 5) Test: Testing the prototype and gathering feedback for improvement. The benefits of the "Design Supervision" is in promoting a participatory approach to problem-solving in the teaching and learning process, fostering understanding and empathy among stakeholders. It aims to develop educational supervisors and teachers with a holistic problem-solving approach and a mindset of continuous learning and growth. This creates a conducive environment for constructive and responsive discussions, meeting the needs of the learners as a priority.
Article Details
References
เกาะกระแส. (2566, ธันวาคม 11). ธนาคารโลกชี้ คะแนน PISA เด็กไทยถดถอย ย้ำ 3 ประเด็นสําคัญ รัฐต้องเร่งแก้ด่วน. https://thaipublica.org/2020/12/world-bank-thailand-report-students-assessment/
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน. (2561). แนวทางการประเมินคุณภาพตามมาตรฐานการศึกษา สาธิตการพิมพ์สหกรณ์การเกษตรของไทย บริษัท จํากัด
สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2560). แผนการศึกษาแห่งชาติ พ.ศ. 2560-2579. บริษัท พริกหวานกราฟฟิค จำกัด
Austin, K. S., Allen, G. E., Brunsting, N. C., Common, E. A., & Lane, K. L. (2023). Active supervision: empowering teachers and families to support students in varied learning contexts. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 67(2), 98-105.
Barron, C. C., Dayton, C. J., & Goletz, J. L. (2022). From the voices of supervisees: What is reflective supervision and how does it support their work?(Part I). Infant Mental Health Journal, 43(2), 207-225.
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard business review, 86(6), 84.
Brown, T. (2010). Change by design. Lian Jing/Tsai Fong Books.
Carroll, M., & Holloway, E. (Eds.). (1998). Counselling supervision in context. Sage.
Eberle, B. (1996). Scamper on: Games for imagination development. Prufrock Press Inc.
Hickson, H. (2023). Exploring how social workers learn and use reflection (Doctoral dissertation,La Trobe).
Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2014). Supervision in Social Work, 5e. Columbia University Press.
National Education Act, 1999. (1999, August 14). Royal Gazette, Volume 116, chapter 74 a,
O’Neil, M. (2023). Mentoring and Supervision in Field Education. Ministry in Context: A Guide toTheological Field Education and Ministry Internships in Australia and New Zealand, 48.
Oktavani, M., Farizi, A., Salsabila, M. S., Suryati, S., & Maseleno, A. (2023). Educational Administration and Supervision Orientation Development. Journal of Learning and Educational Policy (JLEP) ISSN: 2799-1121, 3(04), 24-31.
Rogers, C. R. (1956). Intellectualized psychotherapy. Contemporary Psychology, 1(12), 357–358.
Schon, D. A. (1989). Quotations. A Symposium on Schon's Concept of Reflective Practice: Critiques, Commentaries, Illustrations. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 5(1), 6-9.
Willenberg, E. P. (1966). Chapter VII: Organization, Administration, and Supervision of Special Education. Review of Educational Research, 36(1), 134-150.
