Mechanism of Distance Learning Television Management in Small-Sized Schools in the San Sai 1 Educational Quality Development Network under the Chiang Mai Primary Educational Service Area Office 2

Abstract

         This research aims to: 1) investigate the current conditions and challenges of Distance Learning Television management, 2) explore best practices in high-performing schools, and 3) propose and validate a mechanism of Distance Learning Television management in small-sized schools in the San Sai 1 Educational Quality Development Network under the Chiang Mai Primary Educational Service Area Office 2. Employing a mixed-methods research design, the study integrates both quantitative and qualitative data collected from school administrators and teachers in small-sized schools in the San Sai 1 network, as well as from administrators, academic teachers, and teachers in high-performing schools. Research instruments included self-assessment questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, participatory workshops, and expert review checklists. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation) and thematic content analysis.

         Findings indicate that the most effectively implemented component was the enhancement of physical learning environments, while teacher and personnel development ranked lowest. Key challenges included the lack of formal policy integration of Distance Learning Television, limited Professional Learning Community (PLC) initiatives, and inconsistent internal supervision. In contrast, high-performing schools demonstrated systemic support through effective resource allocation, strategic policy alignment, and sustained pedagogical supervision. The proposed mechanism comprises five essential components: (1) core principles, (2) defined objectives, (3) a structured framework based on six Distance Learning Television management standards, each operationalized through a five-step performance-based management process, (4) critical success factors, and (5) an implementation timeline. The results of expert validation revealed that the mechanism was rated at the highest level in terms of its relevance and feasibility.