THE LEARNING MANAGEMENT USING VALUE CLARIFICATION PROCESS COMBINE THE CONCEPT OF A CONTRACT SYSTEM ACTIVITIES TO DEVELOP SELF - RESPONSIBILITY OF 3TH YEAR CADET CHULACHOMKLAO ROYAL MILITARY ACADEMY

Abstract

          The objectives of this article were to: 1) study the level of self-responsibility characteristics Military Leadership course of third-year cadets who have been taught through the integrated process of values clarification and the concept of contract systems and a conventional learning management. 2) compare the self-responsibility characteristics between an experimental group (third-year cadets who have been taught through the integrated process of values clarification and the concept of contract systems) and a control group (those taught with a conventional learning management). This study was a quasi-experimental research. The sample of this research used was the third-year cadets who have been studying in the Military Leadership course, Semester 2, Academic Year 2020, 60 cadets, obtained based on Cluster Random Sampling. The tools used in the research were: 1) learning management plans with the integrated process of values clarification and the concept of contract systems, 2) conventional learning management plans in the Military Leadership course,3) self-responsibility characteristics assessment form, and 4) Memorandum of Agreement for students and contracting parties. The statistics used for data analysis were mean, standard deviation and t-test. Data were collected using observational methods. The results of this research indicated that: 1) overall self-responsibility characteristics under the Military Leadership course of third-year cadets who have been taught through the integrated process of values clarification and the concept of contract systems and a conventional learning management were at a very good level ( = 11.16, S.D = 0.821). 2) At posttest period, the self-responsibility characteristics of the experimental group ( = 11.53, S.D = 0.681) were higher than the self-responsibility characteristics of the control group ( = 10.80, S.D = 0.961) with a statistical significance level of 0.05.