MODEL FOR CHINESE SANGHA DEVELOPMENT IN THE NEW NORMAL ERA

Authors

  • Phra Weerapong Pasanon Graduate School, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Krishna Fongtanakit Graduate School, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Rachada Fongtanakit Graduate School, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand

Keywords:

Chinese Sangha, Development, New Normal Era

Abstract

Background and Objective: Thai Buddhism responds to new challenges and opportunities that cut across Thai society and cultural patterns in the modern period. Buddhism is playing a growing role in constitutional practice in Thailand. In recent years, constitutional reform efforts in majority-Buddhist Thailand have sparked new questions about the development of Sangha for sustainability. This research focuses on the relationship between ecclesiastical officials and organizational development, learning organization, commitment, and Chinese Sangha development. It evaluates the effectiveness of these relationships and determines how they directly influence the development of the Chinese Sangha. This research aims to examine the causal factors affecting the Chinese Sangha development in the New Normal era.

Methodology: The sample group consisted of Chinese Sangha and Sāmaṇera from 14 Chinese sects’ temples with a structural equation model (SEM). The researchers had set the sample size at a ratio of 20 times the observable variable. The study consisted of 16 observed variables. The sample comprised 325 persons, which included 82 Sangha and 243 Sāmaṇera from 14 Chinese sects’ temples in Thailand. The sampling was conducted with proportional stratified random sampling and set the sample group as a ratio of each stage per population of Upāsaka and Upāsikā.

Main Results: The research questions dictated the use of the structural equation model. The model was a suitable model, which indicated that every latent variable connected with every observed variable, and Error terms were uncorrelated. The research results revealed that the relationship between the ecclesiastical officials and the other endogenous variables was positively related statistically and significantly at a level of 0.01. The statistical analysis found that the ecclesiastical officials, organizational development, learning organization, and commitment influenced Chinese Sangha development at 0.001 and 0.05 accordingly. The leaders’ variable impacted the Chinese Sangha development, valued at 0.94 shared from the indirect effect valued at 0.72 at a statistically significant level of 0.01. Additionally, the learning organization factor had the strongest direct impact on the development of the Chinese - the greatest influence was valued at 0.40. A measurement model indicated satisfaction in Sangha convergent validity and discriminant validity (CR>0.7, AVE>0.5). All significant paths were positively related to personnel development. The structural equation model indicated the absolute fit measure since the model fit the data. The statistical values were as indicated: - Chi-square = 88.49, df = 74, p-value = 0.119, GFI = 0.97, AGFI = 0.93, RMR= 0.005, RMSEA = 0.025, and CFI = 1.00. The findings provided empirical evidence that this structural equation model was fruitful for generalization.

Involvement to Buddhadhamma: The research findings has supported the structural model indicating that the model for the development of Chinese Sangha contributes to sustainable development in Thailand. The model for Chinese Sangha development differs from previous studies, which do not integrate various concepts and theories to promote religious sustainable development. Leaders who focus on human resource development can make the organization thrive. Religious organizations should have a clear roadmap for developing their human resources that promotes global thriving and welfare that contribute to positive socio-economic progress. This interdisciplinary and collaborative research model enables religious leaders to deliver their communities with accurate and timely informative guidelines about the best way to care for the world.

Conclusions: This research result indicated that the findings generally supported the proposed model that was deeply rooted in the theoretical foundations of leaders, organizational development, learning organization, and commitment. The study also produced findings that every causal factor that influenced the dependent variable statistically significantly and consistently with the research objectives.

References

Allen, N. J. & Meyer, J. P. (1990). Organizational socialization tactics: A longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers' commitment and role orientation. Academy of management journal, 33(4), 847-858.

Almansoori, A., AlShamsi, M., Salloum, S. A. & Shaalan, K. (2021). Critical Review of Knowledge Management in Healthcare. Springer, 99-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47411-9_6.

Dahmardeh, M. & Nastiezaie, N. (2019). The impact of organizational trust on organizational commitment through the mediating variable of organizational participation. Public Management Researches, 12(44), 155-180.

Davenport, T., Delong, D. & Beers, M. (1998). Successful Knowledge Management Projects. Sloan Management Review, 2(2), 43-57.

Fein, E. C. & Tziner, A. (2021). The Future of the Leader-Member Exchange Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 736710. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736710.

Fischer, M. (2017). Census and evaluation of p53 target genes. Oncogene, 36(28), 3943-3956.

Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

Grace, J. B. (2008). Structural equation modeling for observational studies. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 72(1), 14-22.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M. & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24.

Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. . (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Scientific Software International.

Jöreskog, K. G. (1988). Analysis of covariance structures. In Nesselroade, J. R. & Cattell, R. B. (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 207-230). Plenum Press. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0893-5_5.

Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.

Leamer, E. E. (1978). Regression selection strategies and revealed priors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73(363), 580-587.

MacCallum, R. (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 100(1), 107-120.

Meng, Yi., Zou, L., He, J. & Luo, C. (2015). Supervisors leadership and health science researchers intrinsic motivation. Nankai Business Review International, 6(1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1108 /nbri-01-2014-0007.

Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human resource management review, 1(1), 61-89.

Miremadi, A., Golchobian, M. M. A. & Ghanadiof, O. (2021). Requirement and Architecture of Organization Development. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(4), 55-64.

Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M. & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of vocational behavior, 14(2), 224-247.

Phra Thepvedhi & Bhavilai, R. (1989). The Buddhist Company and the Dhamma Discipline. Panya publisher.

Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T. & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of applied psychology, 59(5), 603–609. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037335.

Raghavan, A., Demircioglu, M. A. & Orazgaliyev, S. (2021). COVID-19 and the New Normal of Organizations and Employees: An Overview. Sustainability, 13(21), 11942. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3390/su132111942.

Ramalho Luz, C. M. D., Luiz de Paula, S. & de Oliveira, L. M. B. (2018). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and their possible influences on intent to turnover. Revista de Gestão, 25(1), 84-101.

Singh, B., Ishwarya, G., Gupta, M. & Bhattacharyya, S. K. (2015). Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments. Construction and building materials, 85, 78-90. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.036.

Sutthichaimethee, P. & Ariyasajjakorn, D. (2018). A Forecasting Model on Carrying Capacity for Government’s Controlling Measure under Environmental Law in Thailand: Adapting Non-recursive Autoregression Based on the Var-X Model. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy , 10(6) 645-655.

Treesawat, P. S. (2018). A Model of Thai Sangha Administration in the future. Journal of MCU Peace Studies, 6(2), 711-728.

Tuna, M., Ghazzawi, I., Yesiltas, M., Tuna, A. A. & Arslan, S. (2016). The effects of the perceived external prestige of the organization on employee deviant workplace behavior: The mediating role of job satisfaction. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(2), 366-396. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2014-0182.

Wahida, W., Nongkeng, H., Yusriadi, Y. & Tahir, S. Z. B. (2021). The influence of the use of regional information systems and organizational commitment on the performance of financial report compilation through work ability. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 6340-6346). Universitas Iqra Buru.

Xin, X., Miao, X., Chen, Q. & Shang, T. (2022). User participation, knowledge management capability and service innovation: e-commerce enterprises in the digital age. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34(4), 629-646.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-25

How to Cite

Pasanon, P. W. ., Fongtanakit, K., & Fongtanakit, R. (2023). MODEL FOR CHINESE SANGHA DEVELOPMENT IN THE NEW NORMAL ERA. Journal of Buddhist Anthropology, 8(2), 117–127. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSBA/article/view/266016

Issue

Section

Research Articles