Enhancing teachers understanding of formative assessment thought online training program

Main Article Content

Sanikan Saneewong

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to study the impact of online training program on the topic of formative assessment on teachers' understanding of the concept of formative assessment, their capacity to create learning plans based on student work using formative assessment, and their perceptions of this program. The sample group used in this study was 5 teachers who participated and met the requirements for the online training program. There are 3 secondary science teachers, 1 primary science teacher and 1 secondary mathematics teacher. Documents data and questionnaires regarding teachers’ opinions were gathered. Content analysis was used to analyze qualitative data, and mean and standard deviation (S.D.) were used to analyze quantitative data. The results of the research found that teachers: 1) comprehend formative assessment better; 2) can analyze teaching and learning scenarios and offer recommendations for modifying instruction to include more formative assessments; and 3) can reflect on their instruction and adjusting to incorporate more formative assessments. Additionally, teachers who took part in this training expressed strong agreement with their opinions regarding online training courses (𝑥̅ = 3.79, S.D. = 0.42).

Article Details

How to Cite
Saneewong, S. (2024). Enhancing teachers understanding of formative assessment thought online training program. Journal of Science and Science Education (JSSE), 7(2), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.14456/jsse.2024.27
Section
Research Articles in Science Education

References

Anderson, J. (2019). In search of reflection-in-action: An exploratory study of the interactive reflection of four experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86. 102879.

Andersson, C. and Palm, T. (2017). The impact of formative assessment on student achievement: a study of the effects of changes to classroom practice after a comprehensive professional development programme. Learning and Instruction, 49, 92–102.

Baumgart, N. and Halse, C. (1999). Approaches to learning across cultures: The role of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(3), 321-339.

Bell, B. and Cowie, B. (2001). Formative assessment and science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5-25.

Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 3-19.

Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.

Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (2003). ‘In praise of educational research’: Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 623-637.

Bragg, L. A., Walsh, C. and Heyeres, M. (2021). Successful design and delivery of online professional development for teachers: A systematic review of the literature. Computers & Education, 166, 104158.

Brown, G. T. L., Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S. and Yu, W. M. (2009). assessment for student improvement: Understanding Hong Kong teachers' conceptions and practices of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 347-363.

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Virginia: NSTA Press.

Carless. D. (2012). From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings. London: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. and Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130.

Duschl, R. A. (2003). Assessment of inquiry. In J. M. Atkin and J. E. Coffey (Eds.), Everyday assessment in the science classroom (pp. 41-59): Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association Press.

Fajri, Z., Baharun, H., Muali, C., Shofiatun, Farida, L. and Wahyuningtiyas, Y. (2021). Student’s Learning Motivation and Interest; The Effectiveness of Online Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1899, 012178.

Furtak, E. M. (2012). Linking a learning progression for natural selection to teachers’ enactment of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1181–1210.

Han, M. and X. Yang. (2001). Educational assessment in China: Lessons from history and future prospects. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 8(1), 5–10.

Hattie, J. and Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81- 112.

Hsieh, H-F. and Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.

Keeley, P (2008). Science formative assessment: 75 practical strategies for linking assessment, instruction, and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Leitch, R., and Day, C. (2000). Action research and reflective practice: Towards a holistic view. Educational action research, 8(1), 179 – 193.

MacMillan, J. (2014). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction (6th ed). Cranbury, NJ: Pearson Education.

Martin, F., Bolliger, D. U. and Flowers, C. (2021). Design Matters: Development and Validation of the Online Course Design Elements (OCDE) Instrument. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 46–71.

Office of the Secretariat of the Education Council Ministry of Education (2019). Guidelines for developing student competencies. Basic education level. (1st printing). Bangkok: 21 Century Company Limited.

Poole, A. and Adamson, B. (2016). Complex teaching realities and deep rooted cultural traditions: Barriers to the implementation and internalization of formative assessment in China. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1156242.

Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Ruiz-Primo, M. A. and Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers' informal formative assessment practices and students' understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57-84.

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.

Saneewong, S. (2020). Thai primary teachers thinking about formative assessment. Doctoral’s Thesis. Melbourne: Monash University.

Schön, D.A. (2017). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge.

Shepard, L. A. (2008). Formative assessment. In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 279-303). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Sumantri, M. S. and Satriani, R. (2016). The effect of formative testing and self-directed learning on mathematics learning outcomes. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(3), 507- 524.

Tuan, L. T. (2010). Infusing cooperative learning into an EFL classroom. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 64–75.

Volante, L. and Beckett, D. (2011). Formative assessment and the contemporary classroom: Synergies and tensions between research and practice. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(2), 239–255.

Watkins, D. and Biggs, J. B. (1996). The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological, and contextual influences. Camberwell, Melbourne, Vic: ACER.

Watson, F. F., Castano Bishop, M. and Ferdinand-James, D. (2017). Instructional Strategies to Help Online Students Learn: Feedback from Online Students. TechTrends, 61. 420-427.

Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C. and Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice, 11(1), 49–65.

Wiliam, D. and Thompson, M. (2008). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53-82): New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wright, B. D. and Master, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis: Chicago: MESA Press.