มาตรการทางกฎหมายในการคุ้มครองสิทธิในความเป็นอยู่ส่วนตัวของผู้ถูกดักฟังการสื่อสารข้อมูล
Article Sidebar
Published:
Apr 30, 2013
Main Article Content
Abstract
-
Article Details
How to Cite
ทองรวีวงศ์ ค. (2013). มาตรการทางกฎหมายในการคุ้มครองสิทธิในความเป็นอยู่ส่วนตัวของผู้ถูกดักฟังการสื่อสารข้อมูล. Journal of Thai Justice System, 6(1), 1–24. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JTJS/article/view/246045
Section
Academic Articles
Published Manuscripts are the copyright of the Journal of the Justice System. However; the opinions that appeared in the content are the sole responsibility of the author.
References
ภาษาไทย
คณาธิป ทองรวีวงศ์, กฎหมายเกี่ยวกับการสื่อสารมวลชน. กรุงเทพฯ:สำนักพิมพ์นิติธรรม. 2555.
ภาษาอังกฤษ
Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Law of England (1769)
Charles A. Pulaski, Authorizing Wiretap Applications under Title III: Another Dissent to Giordano and Chavez, University of Pennysylvania Law Review, April, 1975.
Daniel R. Dinger, Should Parents Be Allowed to Record a Child's Telephone Conversations When They Believe the Child is in Danger: An Examination of the Federal Wiretap Statute and the Doctrine of Vicarious Consent in the Context of a Criminal Prosecution, Seattle University Law Review, 955, 2004-2005.
Harvard Law Review, Constitutional Law - Fourth Amendament - D.C. Circuit Deems warrantless use of GPS Device, January, 124 Havard Law Review. 827, January, 2011
James G. Carr and Patricia L. Bellia, The LAw of Electronic Surveillance, West, 2011.
Matthew, Bierlien, Policing the Wireless World: Access Liability in the Open Wi-Fi Era, Ohio State Law Journal, 2006
Matt L. Greenberg, LAw Enforcement Officers with Clean Hands May not Make Investigative use of a wiretap that was Illegal acquired by a thrid party, University of Cincinnati Law Review, Winter, 2000
Priscilla M. Regan, Legislating Privacy: Technology, Social Value and Public Policy, The University of North Carolina Press, 1995.
Smith, Robert Ellis, Ben Franklin's Web Site : Privacy and Curiosity from Plymounth Rock to the Internet, 2000.
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979, Report for the year 2011 [Online] available from, Australian Attorney-General's Department Website: http://www.ag.gov.au/Publications
Whitfield, Diffie and Landau, Susan. Privacy on the Line: the Politics of Wiretapping and Encryption. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998.
คำพิพากษาศาลต่างประเทศ
Berger v. New York - 388 U.S. 41 (1967)
Goldman v. United States - 316 U.S. 129 (1942)
Irvine v. California - 347 U.S. 128 (1954)
Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
Nardone v. United States - 308 U.S. 33, (1939)
Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928)
silverman v. United States - 365 U.S. 505 (1961)
United States v. Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (1983)
United States v. Karo, 468 U.S. 705 (1984)
United States v. Maynard 615 F.3d at 558, 2010
คณาธิป ทองรวีวงศ์, กฎหมายเกี่ยวกับการสื่อสารมวลชน. กรุงเทพฯ:สำนักพิมพ์นิติธรรม. 2555.
ภาษาอังกฤษ
Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Law of England (1769)
Charles A. Pulaski, Authorizing Wiretap Applications under Title III: Another Dissent to Giordano and Chavez, University of Pennysylvania Law Review, April, 1975.
Daniel R. Dinger, Should Parents Be Allowed to Record a Child's Telephone Conversations When They Believe the Child is in Danger: An Examination of the Federal Wiretap Statute and the Doctrine of Vicarious Consent in the Context of a Criminal Prosecution, Seattle University Law Review, 955, 2004-2005.
Harvard Law Review, Constitutional Law - Fourth Amendament - D.C. Circuit Deems warrantless use of GPS Device, January, 124 Havard Law Review. 827, January, 2011
James G. Carr and Patricia L. Bellia, The LAw of Electronic Surveillance, West, 2011.
Matthew, Bierlien, Policing the Wireless World: Access Liability in the Open Wi-Fi Era, Ohio State Law Journal, 2006
Matt L. Greenberg, LAw Enforcement Officers with Clean Hands May not Make Investigative use of a wiretap that was Illegal acquired by a thrid party, University of Cincinnati Law Review, Winter, 2000
Priscilla M. Regan, Legislating Privacy: Technology, Social Value and Public Policy, The University of North Carolina Press, 1995.
Smith, Robert Ellis, Ben Franklin's Web Site : Privacy and Curiosity from Plymounth Rock to the Internet, 2000.
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979, Report for the year 2011 [Online] available from, Australian Attorney-General's Department Website: http://www.ag.gov.au/Publications
Whitfield, Diffie and Landau, Susan. Privacy on the Line: the Politics of Wiretapping and Encryption. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998.
คำพิพากษาศาลต่างประเทศ
Berger v. New York - 388 U.S. 41 (1967)
Goldman v. United States - 316 U.S. 129 (1942)
Irvine v. California - 347 U.S. 128 (1954)
Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
Nardone v. United States - 308 U.S. 33, (1939)
Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928)
silverman v. United States - 365 U.S. 505 (1961)
United States v. Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (1983)
United States v. Karo, 468 U.S. 705 (1984)
United States v. Maynard 615 F.3d at 558, 2010