การคุ้มครองสิทธิเสรีภาพของผู้ต้องหาหรือจำเลยจากการดักฟังทางโทรศัพท์และการได้มาซึ่งข้อมูลทางอิเล็กทรอนิกส์ตามมาตรา 14 จัตวา แห่งพระราชบัญญัติป้องกัน และปราบปรามยาเสพติด พ.ศ.2519

Abstract

In crimes in drug cases are all huge benefits involved in the offense makes planning complex activities in multiple organizational characteristics. Therefore, organizations need to develop criminal justice model to seek the facts and evidence in order to bring the perpetrators are brought to justice . Otherwise, society would not exist . For this reason , in special circumstances , in some cases, officials have taken extraordinary measures to investigate how modern technology and the development of a modern form of the offense. The investigation had been using the same can not bring the offender is brought to justice , so the intercepted calls and obtain electronic data on drug offenses under Section 14 bis of the Anti Narcotics . 2519 affecting individual rights is very much the enforcement of such measures must be sensitive enforcement. Because such measures have limitations. In this issue , even in the current criminal offense, some states have a need to use technology to wiretapping to obtain data which is beneficial to the proceedings , but in the meantime, if the use of state power to eavesdrop. phone without collateral rules or control the exercise of power , then what is the problem which was the arbitrary use of state power is a power user of Correctional it yourself which may result. impact on people who are not involved in the crime to have been damaged.

Currently, the organization has the authority to monitor the use of the power to eavesdrop on telephone under Section 14 of the Act to prevent and suppress rising drug. Then in 2519 , the acquisition of electronic data under the provisions of the drug laws clearly is the organization courts and the authorities allowed only one position is Chief Judge of the Criminal Court, the sole issue is the thesis. this needs to be studied as appropriate. And validated using the power , flexibility, or not only. Shall have regard to the prevention and suppression is important.

Quarter of Section 14 of the Anti Narcotics Act 2519 has not been the case requested the intercepted telephone in an emergency or have an urgent need for them in any way. And if you study law abroad will be constituted in such cases as United States clearly stated that if the officers are required to take measures to intercept telephone. Cases where criminal offenses against life or body. Or a conspiracy to commit an offense committed on a national or transnational criminal organizations . The law would allow officials to take measures to intercept telephone beforehand .Issues in determining the type of offenses in the intercepted telephone legal drug, broadly defined , can authorize or consent to the intercepted telephone communications for all types of criminal offenses . An idea about the drugs, which in fact may not be implicitly because it is contrary to the prohibition is particularly this thesis is curly raise issues as mentioned above, the study measures . the problems to be more clear .