Implementation of Assessment for Learning in Online EFL Writing Class: A Case of Novice Undergraduate Teachers

Main Article Content

Ima Fitriyah
Yazid Basthomi
Khusnul Khotimah
Imelda Gozali

Abstract

Within the burgeoning literature on online formative assessment mediated by particular ICT tools in writing courses, the scrutiny focusing on the enactment of assessment for learning (AfL) in the similar context has been inadequately addressed. This current study, therefore, is in an attempt to fill this empirical void by exploring how EFL teachers implement the AfL on their writing courses. This narrative case study recruited three Indonesian EFL undergraduate teachers. They were invited in a series of interviews mediated by WhatsApp video call and voice notes. Nested in the AfL framework, proposed by Lee (2007b), the participants’ stories were analyzed thematically. The findings indicate that, in line with AfL framework, the teachers were able to enhance planning and pre-assessment instruction, share learning goals with students, use feedback forms in feedback delivery, apply self- and peer-assessment, and relate assessment with the pedagogical instruction. Albeit the perceived positive practices, the teachers also experienced some hurdles to engage students in the multiple drafting and sustained reflective process. Some implications and future research direction are also discussed accordingly.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fitriyah, I., Basthomi, Y., Khotimah, K., & Gozali, I. (2022). Implementation of Assessment for Learning in Online EFL Writing Class: A Case of Novice Undergraduate Teachers. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 129–159. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/259925
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Ima Fitriyah, English Language Education, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia

Instructor at the English Language Education, State Islamic Institut of Kediri, Indonesia. She is currently doing her Ph.D. education at Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia. Her research interest includes language testing and assessment, language teacher identity, teacher assessment literacy, and curriculum, material development.

Yazid Basthomi, English Language Education, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia

Professor of Applied Linguistics with the Department of English, Faculty of Letters, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia. He has interests in genre analysis, intercultural education, and digital culture, and is currently a coordinator of the publication division of TEFLIN.

Khusnul Khotimah, English Education Department, Universitas Mataram, Indonesia

Faculty member of English Education Department of Universitas Mataram, Indonesia. She has been actively involved in a wide range of national and international teacher (researcher) professional development activities. Her areas of specialisation include language teaching methodology, learner autonomy, language learning motivation and engagement, and language assessment.

Imelda Gozali, English Language Education, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya, Indonesia

Ph.D. candidate from the Graduate School of English Language Education, Faculty of Letters, Universitas Negeri Malang. Indonesia. Her current research interest is in teaching English writing, the use of technology in language learning and teachers’ professional development.

References

Alam, J., & Aktar, T. (2019). Assessment challenges & impact of formative portfolio assessment (FPA) on EFL learners’ writing performance: A case study on the preparatory English language course. English Language Teaching, 12(7), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n7p161

Alderson, J. C., Brunfaut, T., & Harding, L. (2017). Bridging assessment and learning: A view from second and foreign language assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2017.1331201

Alshakhi, A. (2018). Revisiting the writing assessment process at a Saudi English Language Institute: Problems and Solutions. English Language Teaching, 12(1), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n1p176

Amirian, S. M. R., Bonjakhi, M., & Nafchi, A. M. (2016). The effect of online dynamic assessment of university students’ writing electronic portfolios on micro-componential writing ability. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 6(3), 51-61.

Asadifard, A., & Afghari, A. (2016). The impact of systematic implementation of formative assessment (Fa) on Efl learners’ Affect. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 6(8), 94-102.

Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Cambridge University Press.

Baird, J.-A., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: Fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 317–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337

Barkhuizen, G. (2014). Narrative research in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 47(4), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000172

Barkhuizen, G., Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2013). Narrative inquiry in language teaching and learning research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203124994

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170408600105

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2012). Assessment for learning in the classroom. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and Learning (pp. 11–32). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250808.n2

Chong, I. (2017). How students’ ability levels influence the relevance and accuracy of their feedback to peers: A case study. Assessing Writing, 31(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.002

Chong, S. W. (2018). Three paradigms of classroom assessment: implications for written feedback research. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(4), 330–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1405423

Clandinin, D. J. (2013). Engaging in narrative inquiry. Left Coast Press, Inc.

Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1998). Stories to live by: Narrative understandings of school reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 28(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/0362-6784.00082

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed). Pearson.

Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2

Dann, R. (2014). Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.898128

Fitria, T. N. (2020). Teaching English through online learning system during Covid-19 Pandemic. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(2), 138-149. https://doi.org/10.32332/pedagogy.v8i2.2266

Fitriyah, I., & Jannah, M. (2021). Online assessment effect in EFL classroom: an investigation on students and teachers’ perceptions. IJELTAL, 5(2), 265-284.

Green, A. (2018). Assessment for learning in language education. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 6(3), 9–18.

Hosseinpour, N., Biria, R., & Rezvani, E. (2019). Promoting academic writing proficiency of Iranian EFL learners through blended learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(4), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.640525

Lam, D. M. K. (2021). Learning-oriented language assessment—feedback as a learning-oriented assessment practice. In G. Atta (Ed.), Learning-oriented language assessment (pp. 85–106). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003014102-7

Lam, R. (2016). Assessment as learning: Examining a cycle of teaching, learning, and assessment of writing in the portfolio-based classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 1900–1917. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.999317

Lam, R. (2018). Understanding assessment as Learning in writing classrooms: The case of portfolio assessment. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 6(3), 19-36

Lee, I. (2007a). Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning? Assessing Writing, 12(3), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.003

Lee, I. (2007b). Assessment for learning: Integrating assessment, teaching, and learning in the ESL/EFL writing classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(1), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.1.199

Lee, I. (2016). Putting students at the centre of classroom L2 writing assessment. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 72(2), 258–280. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2802

Lee, I. (2020). Feedback in L2 writing classroom. TEFLIN Publication Division in collaboration with Bintang Sejahtera Press.

Lee, I., & Coniam, D. (2013). Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination-driven system in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.11.003

Lee, I., Mak, P., & Yuan, R. E. (2019). Assessment as learning in primary writing classrooms: An exploratory study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 62, 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.04.012

Mak, P., & Lee, I. (2014). Implementing assessment for learning in L2 writing: An activity theory perspective. System, 47, 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.018

Mimirinis, M. (2019). Qualitative differences in academics’ conceptions of e-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1493087

Mohamadi, Z. (2018). Comparative effect of online summative and formative assessment on EFL student writing ability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.003

Muhammad, A. A., & Ockey, G. J. (2021). Upholding languageassessmentquality during the COVID-19 pandemic: Some final thoughts and questions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 18(1), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2020.1867555

Mujtaba, S. M., Reynolds, B. L., Parkash, R., & Singh, M. K. M. (2021). Individual and collaborative processing of written corrective feedback affects second language writing accuracy and revision. Assessing Writing, 50, 100566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100566

Nurhayati, A. (2020). The Implementation of formative assessment in EFL writing: A case study at a secondary school in Indonesia. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(2), 126-137. https://doi.org/10.32332/pedagogy.v8i2.2263

Parr, J. M., & Timperley, H. (2010). Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching and learning and student progress. Assessing Writing, 15(2), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.004

Pavlenko, A. (2002). Narrative study: Whose story is it, anyway? TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588332

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon. 9 (6), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843

Ridhwan, M. (2017). Understanding formative and summative assessment for EFL teachers: Theoretical reflections on assessment for learning. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 4(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2017.vol4(1).505

Sachs, R., & Polio, C. (2007). Learners’ uses of two types of written feedback on a L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(1), 67–100. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107070039

Selvaraj, A. M., & Azman, H. (2020). Reframing the effectiveness of feedback in improving teaching and learning achievement. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(4), 1055-1062. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20654

Shahgoli, N., & Farrokhi, F. (2016). The effect of individualization versus collaboration on the accurcy of written grammar. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 6(5), 356-370.

Sonday, A., Ramugondo, E., & Kathard, H. (2020). Case study and narrative inquiry as merged methodologies: A critical narrative perspective. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940692093788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937880

Spivey, M. F., & McMillan, J. J. (2014). Classroom versus online assessment. Journal of Education for Business, 89(8), 450–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2014.937676

Wang, L., Lee, I., & Park, M., (2020). Chinese university EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices of classroom writing assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100890.

Wang, L., & Lee, I. (2021). L2 learners’ agentic engagement in an assessment as learning-focused writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 50, 100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100571

Williams, C., & Beam, S. (2019). Technology and writing: Review of research. Computers & Education, 128, 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.024

Zhang, Z., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004

Zou, M., Kong, D., & Lee, I. (2021). Teacher engagement with online formative assessment in EFL writing during Covid-19 pandemic: The case of China. The Asia-Pacific Edu Res. 30, 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00593-7