EFL Tertiary Learners’ Percpetions of Self-Assessment on Writing in English

Main Article Content

Jiraporn Dhanarattigannon
Patteera Thienpermpool

Abstract

Self-assessment (SA) allows students to evaluate their language performance, as well as encourage and stimulate their language learning. However, only a few studies have been conducted on self-assessment in EFL contexts, particularly in Thailand. Among these studies, they have rarely focused on students’ perceptions and how they use self-assessment to improve their writing ability. Thus, this study explored university EFL students’ perceptions and reflections on the use of self-assessment in English writing in Thailand. A mixed-methods research design was used to explore a total of 41 students in two classes (18 and 23 students). Questionnaires, self-assessment forms, and reflective journals were used to collect data from two groups of students enrolling in writing courses at two universities. Mean, S.D., and dependent t-test were used for the analysis of quantitative data, while content analysis was used for the analysis of qualitative data. The results revealed that these students perceived self-assessment as a tool for writing development (self-monitoring), a means of improving their attitudes about writing, and a means of developing their self-confidence. The results suggest that using self-assessment can help students become independent learners and improve their performance in English writing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dhanarattigannon, J., & Thienpermpool, P. (2022). EFL Tertiary Learners’ Percpetions of Self-Assessment on Writing in English. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 521–545. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/259939
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Jiraporn Dhanarattigannon, Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Humanities, Kasetsart University, Thailand

An Assistant Professor in the Department of Foreign Languages at Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand. Her areas of interest include EFL writing (the process-based approach), Extensive Reading, writing assessments, self-assessment, online language learning and teaching, and corpus-based research.

Patteera Thienpermpool, Department of International Language Teaching, Faculty of Education, Silpakorn University, Thailand

A lecturer in the Department of International Language Teaching, Faculty of Education, Silpakorn University, Thailand. Her major research interests include teaching and learning vocabulary, materials development for language teaching, language testing and evaluation, and technology in language education.

References

Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4, 1-13. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/feduc.2019.00087

Bachman, L. (2000). Modern language testing at the turn of the century: Assuring that what we count, counts. Language Testing, 17(1), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220001700101

Belachew, M., Getinet, M., & Gashaye, A. (2015). Perception and practice of self-assessment in EFL writing classrooms. Journal of Languages and Culture, 6(1), 1-8. doi: 10.5897/JLC2013.0254

Bing, X. (2016). A study of the effects of student self-assessment on the EFL writing of Chinese college students. Journalism and Mass Communication, 6(2), 91-107. doi:10.17265/21606579/ 2016.02.005

Bowman, J. E. (2017). Engaging students in the assessment process: A quantitative study of peer- and self-assessment [Doctoral dissertation, Notre Dame of Maryland University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. https://www.proquest.com/ openview/022bfcc783d0ecc1cea68b23f3a43997/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Teachers helping EFL students improve their writing through written feedback: The case of native and non-native English-speaking teachers’ beliefs. Frontier in Psychology, 13, 1-15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.804313

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (4th ed.). Pearson.

Culham, R., & Wheeler, A. (2003). 40 reproducible forms for the writing traits classroom. Scholastic.

Dhanarattigannon, J. (2010). Teaching of writing process-based approach. Humanities Journal (Thailand), 17(2), 25-40.

Dokchandra, D. (2018). The effects of process writing approach on performance of an overcrowded EFL writing class at a university in Thailand. The 1st Annual International Conference on Language and Literature, KnE Social Sciences & Humanities, 161-173. doi: 10.18502/kss.v3i4.1931

Elgadal, H. A. (2017). The effect of self-assessment on inexperienced EFL students’ writing during revision. [Unpublished dissertation]. University of Birmingham.

Herayati, D. F. (2020). Teaching writing through self-assessment and analytical scoring. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(2), 4268-4272.

Huang, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Does a process-genre approach help improve students’ argumentative writing in English as a foreign language? Findings from an intervention study. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 36(4), 339–364. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2019.1649223

Huda, M. I. (2020). Promoting learner autonomy through self-assessment in writing class. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 11(2), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v11i2.7561

Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F. & Hughey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Newbury House.

Ministry of Education. (2008). Basic Education Curriculum 2008. Agricultural Cooperative Assembly of Thailand. (in Thai) http://academic.obec.go.th/images/document/1525235513_d_1.pdf

Panadero, E., Brown, G. L., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803-830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2

Puengpipattrakul, W. (2014). A process approach to writing to develop Thai EFL students’ socio-cognitive skills. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 11(2) 270-284. doi: 10.18502/kss.v3i4.1931

Ratminingsih, N. M., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Vigayanti, L.P.D. (2018). Self-assessment: The effect on students’ independence and writing competence. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 277-290. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11320a

Sapsirin, S. (2014). Self-assessment of business English writing ability of Thai university students: Criterion-related validity and gender differences. NIDA Journal of Language and Communication, 19(22), 77-91.

Suwanarak, K. (2018). Self-evaluation of Thai adult learners in English writing practice. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(2), 95-111. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2402-08

Thongpai, J., & Deerajviset, P. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on writing of Thai EFL students in different groups of learning styles. In Multidisciplinary perspective of local wisdom: Past, present, and future of Asia. The 5th Asian Academic Society International Conference (pp. 173-181). Khon Kaen Univeristy. http://aasic.org/proc/aasic/article/view/289/286

Wong, K. M., & Mak, P. (2018). Self-assessment in the primary L2 writing classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 75(2), 1-14. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.2018-0197

Zhang, T. F. (2021). The effect of highly focused versus mid-focused written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge development. System, 99, 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2021. 102493