Individual, Pair and Group EFL Activities for Aviation Students at a Thai University: A Closer Look at Language Achievement and Attitudes
Main Article Content
Abstract
For successful English language communication, EFL students are not only required to have effective language skills for the workplace, but also be able to use the language socially. This study aims to 1) examine student progress in language achievement in the airline context and 2) to investigate student attitudes towards the use of CLT activities in developing English communication skills. The participants were 27 EFL students from one public university in Thailand. The data were collected quantitatively from a language achievement test in the airline context and from a questionnaire. SPSS was used to analyze the data to determine mean scores and standard deviations. The findings from a paired t-test revealed significant differences between the pre-test and the post-test scores at the .05 confidence level. Specifically, the students who engaged in CLT activities had a better understanding of English used in the airline context compared to those who did not, showing marked improvement in vocabulary skills, colloquial language ability and grammatical competency. Furthermore, the results from the questionnaire reflected that students in the study viewed CLT activities (i.e., individual, pair and group activities) as a productive method for developing their English communication skills in the airline context. As a result, students who engage in CLT activities gained a better understanding of English compared to those who did not.
Article Details
References
Allen, M. (2017). One-group pretest-posttest design. The SAGE
encyclopedia of communication research methods.
https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/ 9781483381411.n388
AL-Garni, S. A., and Almuhammadi, A. H. (2019). The Effect of using
communicative language teaching activities on EFL students’ speaking skills at the University of Jeddah. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 72-86. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n6p72
Alkurdi, R., & Alghazo, S. (2021). Teachers’ misbehaviours in class and students’
reactions: A case study. IAFOR Journal of Education: Language Learning in Education, 9(3), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.3.06
Boonpanya, M., & Pojchanaphong, D. (2018). Communication problem
solving strategies of Thai students in an exchange program in Singapore. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language, Innovation, Culture and Education, 131-142. https://icsai.org/procarch/9iclice/9iclice-067.pdf
Boonyarattanasoontorn, P. (2017). An investigation of Thai students’
English language writing difficulties and their use of writing
strategies. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 111-118. https://dx.doi.org/10.26500/JARSSH-02-2017-0205
Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles. Addison Wesley Longman
Inc.
Canale, M., Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative
approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1
Devon, A. (2019). Shadowing approaches inside and outside of the
classroom. The Journal of Rikkyo University Language Center, 42, 3-13. http://doi.org/10.14992/00018491
Eisenring M. A., & Margana, M. (2019). The importance of teacher-
students interaction in communicative language teaching (CLT). PRASASTI: Journal of Linguistics, 4(1), 46-54. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.20961/prasasti.v4i1.17052
Ellis, S., & Landsford, L. (2015). English for cabin crew. Oxford
University Press.
Hitakorn, P. (2019). English for airline personnel. Kasetsart University
Press.
Huriyah, L., Nuriawarti, F. A., Zahro, S. F., & Hardini, W. A. (2020). Peer
dialogue as an effective way for teaching speaking: Indonesian EFL
students’ voices. Proceedings of the International Conference on English Language Teaching (ICONELT 2019), 434, 235-237 https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200427.046
Jatmiko, J. (2017). The implementation of pair work to improve students’ English speaking to the second semester at pharmacist program of Health Sciences Faculty of Kadiri University. English Education: Journal of English Teaching and Research, 2(1), 40-52, https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v2i1.733
Junipisa, N. M., & Aristana, I. N. (2021). Shadowing technique to improve
students’ listening skill. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 9(2), 134-139. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v9i2.32516
Kampookaew, P. (2020). An analysis of grammatical errors made by Thai
EFL university students in an EAP writing class: Issues and recommendations. rEFLections, 27(2), 246-273.
Kaweera, C., Yawiloeng, R., & Tachom, K. (2019). Individual, pair and
group writing activity: A case study of undergraduate EFL student
writing. English Language Teaching, 12(10), 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n10p1
Kesmez, A. (2021). EFL students’ vocabulary learning strategies and the
difficulties faced by them in vocabulary learning. International Journal of Language Academy, 9(1), 78-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ijla.48703
Lalrozari, J., & Fonjiachaleke, H. (2018). Examining English language
learning difficulties amongst Thai students. Proceedings of 114th ISERD International Conference, 1-4.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques & principles in
language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Masoudzadeh, A. B., & Lahijani, R. H. (2021). Communicative language
teaching method (CLT) and final examination of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Language and Translation Research, 1(3), 71-95. https://dx.doi.org/10.12906/978389966737_004
Mede, E., & Dikilitas, K. (2015). Teaching and learning sociolinguistic competence:
Teachers’ critical perceptions. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 2(3), 14-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.15.29.2.3
Moradi, N. (2020). The impact of classroom management on students’
communicative skills in English language classroom. Language Testing in Focus: An International Journal, 2, 22-33. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltf.2020.02.03
Nunan, D., & Lamb, C. (1996). The self-directed teacher: Managing the
learning process. Cambridge University Press.
Parasakul, L. (2010). English in airline business. Chulalongkorn
University Press.
Phothongsunan, S. (2020). Teachers’ conceptions of the CLT approach in
English language education. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 10(4), 121-127. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0071
Pupphavesa, N. (2017). Problems of Thai airways senior cabin crew
toward English language communication with guests in royal first
class and new business class on international flights [Master’s
thesis, Thammasat University]. National Research Council of
Thailand. https://doi.org/10.14457/tu.the.2017.1150
Richards, J. (2000). Series Editor’s Preface. In Schmitt, N. Vocabulary in
Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Rojas, M. A., & Villafuerte, J. (2018). The influence of implementing role-
play as an educational technique on EFL speaking development.
Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(7), 726-732. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0807.02
Rouf, M. A., & Sultana, K. N. (2018). Learner role in CLT: Practices in the
higher secondary classrooms. Journal of NELTA, 20(1-2), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v20i1-2.19775
Sabbah, S. S., Hallabieh, F., & Hussein, O. (2020). Communication skills
among undergraduate students at AI-Quds University. World Journal of Education, 10(6), 136-142. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v10n6p136
Savignon, S. J. (2002). Interpreting communicative language teaching.
Yale University Press.
Shobikah, N. (2020). The competencies in English. Journal of Research on English
and Language Learning (J-REaLL), 1(1), 23-36.
http://dx.doi.org/10.33474/j-reall.v1i1.5280
Siraranghom, W. (2020). Using activities to develop English speaking skills
of the learners in an English as a foreign language (EFL) context.
CRMA Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7, 94-107.
Sözen, E., & Güven, U. (2019). The effect of online assessments on
students’ attitudes towards undergraduate-level geography courses. International Education Studies, 12(10), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n10p1
Srisang, K. (2017). A survey of the needs of English communication
skills and communication problems between Thai customer service staff and non-Thai passengers. Thammasat University: Bangkok. https://doi.org/10.14457/tu.the.2017.965
Suryati, N. (2015). Classroom interaction strategies employed by English
teachers at lower secondary schools. TEFLIN Journal, 26(2), 247-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/247-264
Thedpitak, A., & Somphong, M. (2021). Exploring Thai EFL learners’ attitudes
toward the use of mobile applications for language learning. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(1), 370-398.
Toro, V., Camacho-Minuche, G., Pinza-Tapia, E., & Paredes, F. (2018). The
use of the communicative language teaching approach to improve students’ oral skills. English Language Teaching, 12(1), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n1p110
Tuan, D. M. (2021). Learner autonomy in English language learning:
Vietnamese EFL students’ perceptions and practices. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 307-317. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i2.29605
West, J. A. (2016). Adaptation of communicative language teaching
methodology to an English textbook for English language learning of NIDA students. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 52, 25-52.
Yavari, F., & Shafiee, S. (2019). Effects of shadowing and tracking on
intermediate EFL learners’ oral fluency. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 869-884. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12156a