A Study of Move Analysis in American NPOs' Online Fundraising Pages: A Comparison between Domestic and Global Campaigns in Health Operations

Main Article Content

Nuttiya Sakulthong
Chanika Gampper

Abstract

This study examines the language used in the campaign descriptions (CDs) posted by nonprofit organizations (NPOs) through www.globalgiving.org, an international fundraising platform for nonprofits around the world. The purpose of this study aims to identify the similarities and differences among those that occurred in the campaign descriptions of domestic and global campaigns under the theme of health operations. One condition is that each NPO has to write a campaign description following the template provided by the website, which contains four different sections: ‘Summary’, ‘Challenge’, ‘Solutions’, and ‘Long-term Impact’. A move analysis on 158 CDs found six moves and 15 steps used across the descriptions in both corpora. The results suggested that ‘Identifying the Locations of the Problem’ was an essential move for the global campaigns, while this move was not necessary to be included in the domestic campaigns. The common rhetorical moves found in this study can help other NPOs that are planning on putting their campaigns online by writing their descriptions in English. The results will benefit nonprofits around the world. Language learners and professionals can also learn the persuasive writing style of fundraising discourses in this study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sakulthong, N., & Gampper, C. (2022). A Study of Move Analysis in American NPOs’ Online Fundraising Pages: A Comparison between Domestic and Global Campaigns in Health Operations. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 946–976. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/259958
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Nuttiya Sakulthong, Language Institute, Thammasat University, Thailand

A master’s degree student at the Language Institute of Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand. Her research interests include move analysis and fundraising discourses.

Chanika Gampper, Language Institute, Thammasat University, Thailand

A lecturer at the Language Institute of Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand. Her research interests include testing and evaluation, contrastive rhetoric, and discourse analysis.

References

Abelen, E., Redeker, G., & Thompson, S. A. (1993). The rhetorical

structure of US-American and Dutch fund-raising letters. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 13(3), 323-350. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1993.13.3.323

Askehave, I., & Swales, J. M. (2001). Genre identification and

communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution. Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.2.195

Azhar, I. (2015). Philanthropy language construction. International

Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2(2), 119–129. http://ijhcschiefeditor.wix.com/ijhcs

Barman, E. (2017). The social bases of Philanthropy. Annual Review of

Sociology, 43(1), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-

-053524

Becker, P. (1974). A theory of social interactions. National Bureau of

Economic Research.

Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1994). Genre knowledge in disciplinary

communication: Cognition/culture/power. Routledge.

Berzlánovich, I., & Redeker, G. (2012). Genre-dependent interaction of

coherence and lexical cohesion in written discourse. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2012-0008

Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional

settings. Routledge.

Bhatia, V. K. (1998). Generic patterns in fundraising discourse. New

Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 1998(22), 95–110.

https://doi.org/10.1002/pf.2207

Bhatia, V. K. (2002). Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model.

Ibérica: Revista de La Asociación Europea de Lenguas Para Fines Específicos (AELFE), 4, 3–19.

Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view.

Bloomsbury Publishing.

Bhatia, V. K. (2012). Critical reflections on genre analysis. Ibérica: Revista

de La Asociación Europea de Lenguas Para Fines Específicos (AELFE), 24, 17–28.

Biel, Ł. (2017). Genre analysis and translation. In K. Malmkjœr (Ed.), The

Routledge handbook of translation studies and linguistics (pp. 151–164). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315692845-11

Browning, B. (2012). Perfect phrases for fundraising. McGraw-Hill

Education.

Burke, K. (1945). A grammar of motives, semantics with a difference.

Prentice Hall.

Connor, U., & Mauranen, A. (1999). Linguistic analysis of grant proposals:

European Union Research Grants. English for Specific Purposes,

(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-4906(97)00026-4

Cotos, E. (2019). Articulating societal benefits in grant proposals: Move

analysis of Broader Impacts. English for Specific Purposes, 54, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.11.002

Flowerdew, L. (2000). Using a genre-based framework to teach

organizational structure in academic writing. ELT Journal, 54(4), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.4.369

Fusari, S. (2009). Philanthropic direct mail in an English/ Italian

perspective: A corpus-based study. Facta Universitatis, 7(2), 149–161. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=268223

Gautier, A., & Pache, A. C. (2013). Research on corporate philanthropy: A

review and assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 343-369.

Goering, E., Connor, U. M., Nagelhout, E., & Steinberg, R. (2009).

Persuasion in fundraising letters: An interdisciplinary study. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(2), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009339216

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry

research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003

Kitova, Y. (2014). Discourse and linguistic features in appeal letters.

Academia.edu.

Lainer-Vos, D. (2014). Brothers’ keepers: Gift giving networks and the

organization of Jewish American diaspora nationalism. Socio-Economic Review, 12(3), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu003

Lee, P. C.-W. (2016). A discourse description of four fundraising texts –

linguists meet practitioners: An exploratory study. Discourse and Interaction, 9(2), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.5817/di2016-2-25

Longacre, R. E. (1992). The discourse strategy of an appeals letter. In

W.C. Mann & S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text (pp. 109–130). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.16.06lon

Martin, J. (2017). Move analysis and the philanthropic letter. ERA:

Education and Research Archive. University of Alberta Libraries.

https://doi.org/10.7939/R3BK17389

Musick, M. A., & Wilson, J. (2007). Volunteers. Amsterdam University

Press.

Ritzenhein, D. N. (1998). Content analysis of fundraising letters. New

Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 1998(22), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/pf.2202

Sadeghi, V., & Samuel, M. (2013). Genre analysis of the letters of appeal.

Discourse Studies, 15(2), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612471467

Sandouka, K. (2019). Text analysis of crowdfunding: A literature review.

Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), 1–5.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research

settings. Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (2000). Languages for specific purposes. Annual Review of

Applied Linguistics, 20, 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190500200044

Thumvichit, A. (2017). A comparative genre analysis of Thai and UK

hotels’ responses to complaints on TripAdvisor [Doctoral dissertation, Thammasat University]. Thammasat University Library. https://doi.org/10.14457/TU.the.2017.745

Turner, R. H., & Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary

forms. American Sociological Review, 26(4), 635-636. https://doi.org/10.2307/2090265

Upton, T. A. (2002). Understanding direct mail letters as a genre.

International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 7(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.7.1.04upt

Upton, T. A., & Cohen, M. A. (2009). An approach to corpus-based

discourse analysis: The move analysis as example. Discourse Studies, 11(5), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609341006

Wei, J., & Gampper, C. (2014). A corpus-based collocation study and

move patterns in online smartphone press releases. LEARN

Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 7(2), 99–110.

Zhou, M., Lu, B., Fan, W., & Wang, G. A. (2016). Project description and

crowdfunding success: An exploratory study. Information Systems

Frontiers, 20(2), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-

-1