Thai Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Filipino ESL/EFL Lecturers’ Intercultural Communicative Practices in Science Teacher Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
There has been an increasingly dominant presence of Filipino ESL/EFL lecturers in Thai higher education; yet, few studies explore the intercultural communicative practices between these Filipino lecturers and pre-service teachers in science teacher education. This study examined Thai pre-service science teachers’ perceptions of their Filipino lecturers. The theoretical framework of this study consists of intercultural communicative competence (ICC), tensions between native and non-native English speakers (NES-NNES), and Thai students’ perceptions of English and its varieties. Using a qualitative research paradigm, this study employed focus-group interviews with 15 pre-service teachers from biology, math, and general science majors at a Rajabhat University in Thailand. The findings suggest three key issues: 1) Filipino lecturers’ teaching styles and methods, 2) classroom communication, and 3) their English accent. The implications of this study promote not only the integration of cross-cultural exchanges and translanguaging practices into classroom interactions between NES/NNES lecturers and Thai learners but also awareness of World Englishes and Global Englishes to envisage multicultural/lingual realities in social and professional contexts. This study sheds new light on the pragmatic benefits of enhancing Thai learners’ intercultural communicative competence as part of ESL/EFL pedagogy in Thai higher education.
Article Details
References
Akkakoson, S. (2019). Thai language learners’ sense of English ownership. PASAA, 58,
-263.
Baker, W. (2018). Culture and identity through English as a Lingua Franca: Rethinking concepts and goals in intercultural communication. Walter de Gruyter.
Bright, D., & Phan, L. (2011). Learning to speak like us: Identity, discourse and teaching English in Vietnam. In L. J. Zhang, R. Ruddy, & L. Alsagoff (Eds.), Changing perspectives in a globalised world (pp.121-140). Prentice Hall.
Buckingham, L. (2015). Recognising English accents in the community: Omani students' accent preferences and perceptions of nativeness. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(2), 182-197.
Choomthong, D., & Manowong, S. (2020). Varieties of English accents: A study of the degree of preference and intelligibility among second-year English major students at Maejo University. Manusya: Journal of Humanities, 23(2), 151-169.
Corbett, J. (2022). An intercultural approach to English language teaching (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters.
Elliott, J. (2005). Using narrative in social research. SAGE Publications.
Fang, F., Zhang, L. J., & Sah, P. K. (2022). Translanguaging in language teaching and learning: Current practices and future directions. RELC Journal, 53(2), 305-312.
Inpeng, S., & Nomnian, S. (2020). The use of Facebook in a TEFL program based on the TPACK framework. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 13(2),369-393.
Inpeng, S., & Nomnian, S. (2022). Facebook as a promotional tool for learner autonomy: Thai pre-service EFL teachers’ voices. TEFLIN Journal, 33(2), 292-309.
Jhaiyanuntana, A., & Nomnian, S. (2020). Intercultural communication challenges and strategies for the Thai undergraduate hotel interns. PASAA, 59, 204-235.
Jimenez-Silva, M., & Olson, K. (2012). A community of practice in teacher education: Insights and perceptions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 335- 348.
Jindapitak, N., & Teo, A. (2013). Accent priority in a Thai university context: A common sense revisited. English Language Teaching, 6(9), 193-201.
Jindapitak, N., & Teo, A. (2014). Thai tertiary English majors’ attitudes towards and awareness of World Englishes. Journal of Studies in the English Language, 7, 74-116.
Kachru, B. (1985). Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In K. Bolton, & B. Krachru (Eds.), World Englishes: Critical Concepts in Linguistics, Vol. 2 (pp. 11–30). Routledge.
Khaopanya, K., Promphakping, B., & Mee-Udon, F. (2011). Myanmarese migrant workers in Nakorn Isan Province, the Northeast of Thailand. KKU Research Journal (Graduate Studies), 11(4), 123-134.
Kobayashi, Y. (2017). ASEAN English teachers as a model for international English learners: Modified teaching principles. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 682-696.
Kobayashi, Y. (2021). Japanese English learners’ perceptions of Filipino teachers’ online English lessons: Implications for Global Englishes research. RELC Journal. doi:10.1177/00336882211061629
Liamputtong, P. (2019). Qualitative research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Lincoln, Y., & Denzin, N. (2003). Turning Points in Qualitative Research: Tying Knots in a Handkerchief. Altamira Press.
López-Rocha, S. (2016). Intercultural communicative competence: Creating awareness and promoting skills in the language classroom. In C. Goria, O. Speicher, & S. Stollhans (Eds.), Innovative language teaching and learning at university: Enhancing participation and collaboration (pp. 105-111). Research-publishing.net
Makcharoen, P. (2018). Myanmar migrant workers situation in Nakhon Pathom Province: Problems and coexistence in the community. Burapha Journal of Political Economy, 6(1), 63- 94.
Mongkolhutthi, P. (2022). Expatriate native English-speaking lecturers in a Thai university context: Privileged or underemployed? LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 326-350.
Namphandung, K., Boonyarattanasoontorn, P., Tepnarong, T., Nokim, N., Puimarth, P., & Ponin, I. (2021). An investigation of attitudes towards Thai pre-service English teachers to standard English, World Englishes, native and non-native English-speaking teachers. Manutsat Paritat: Journal of Humanities, 43(2), 197-215.
Ou, W.A., Gu, M.M., & Hult, F.M. (2020) Translanguaging for intercultural communication in international higher education: Transcending English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Multilingualism, 20(2), 1-19.
Perez-Amurao, A., & Sunanta, S. (2020). They are ‘Asians Just Like Us’: Filipino teachers, colonial aesthetics and English language education in Thailand. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 35(1), 108-137.
Phumpho, R., & Nomnian, S. (2019). Challenges for Thai business people using English in ASEAN. Kasetsart Journal of Social Science, 40, 743–750.
Phusit, N., & Suksiripakonchai, W. (2018). A study of Thai university students’ attitudes towards pronunciation models in English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 8(1), 20-24.
Prabjandee, D. (2020). Teacher professional development to implement Global Englishes language teaching. Asian Englishes, 22(1), 52-67.
Promnath, K., & Tayjasanant, C. (2016). English-Thai code-switching of teachers in ESP classes. PASAA, 51, 97-126.
Quigley, K.F.F., & Kanjananiyot, P. (2022). How can Rajabhat universities pull back from the precipice? US World News
https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20220808122107371
Rose, H., McKinley, J., & Galloway, N. (2021). Global Englishes and language teaching: A review of pedagogical research. Language Teaching, 54(2), 157-189. doi:10.1017/S0261444820000518
Rueangdej, C., & Nomnian, S. (2021). Stakeholders’ insights into migrant students’ experiences in a Thai public school: A linguistic ecological perspective. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 14(2), 243–266.
Salmons, J. (2016). Doing qualitative research online. Sage Publications.
Sangnok, P., & Jaturapitakkul, N. (2019). Perceptions of Thai undergraduate students toward the Asian English accents on listening comprehension. rEFLections, 26(2), 24–50.
Sangpong, S. (2021). A study of English language learning strategies used by the 1st-year undergraduate students at Thepsatri Rajabhat University. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Thepsatri Rajabhat University Journal, 12(3), 37–52.
Snodin, N., Young, T., Thongnuan, T., Bumrungsalee, I., & Nattheeraphong, A. (2021). The migration of international academics to Thailand and their experiences of Thai higher education. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 36(2), 225–257.
Suebwongsuwan, W., & Nomnian, S. (2020). Thai hotel undergraduate interns’ awareness and attitudes towards English as a lingua franca. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9, 704- 714.
Tananuraksakul, N. (2017). Building up Thai EFL students’ positive attitudes toward their non- native English accented speech with the use of phonetics website. Teaching English with Technology, 17(4), 52-63.
Thienthong, A., & Uthaikorn, K. (2023). Thai learners’ attitudes toward English accents: Fields and stages of study. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(1), 676-702.
Thongprayoon, T., Wangphasit, L., Yamrung, R., & Lanka, W. (2020). Intercultural communicative language learning competencies of undergraduate students in an international program in Thailand. THAITESOL Journal, 33(2), 1-18.
Ulla, M.B. (2019). Filipinos as EFL teachers in Bangkok, Thailand: Implications for language education policy in the ASEAN region. RELC Journal, 52(3), 1-15.
Vivatananukul, M. (2015). Perception and intercultural communication between Thai students and ASEAN people. KKU International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(3), 29-52.
Waterworth, P. (2016). Teaching English in ASEAN: The voices of English teachers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 154-166.
Wattananukij, W., & Crabtree, R.M. (2020). Language attitudes toward Philippine English: A comparative study among Thai undergraduate students with and without exposure to Philippine English teachers. NIDA Journal of Language and Communication, 25(37), 18-40.
Wattanavorakijkul, N. (2020). Measuring intercultural sensitivity of Thai university students: Impact of their participation in the US Summer Work Travel Program. rEFLections, 27(1), 81-102.
Wilkinson, M.T. (2016). What do they think of me? A semi-ethnographic investigation into student stereotypes and biases towards teachers. The New English Teachers, 10(1), 20-41.