Hate Speech in YouTube Comments on Rohingya Refugees in Thailand and Syrian Refugees in Europe

Main Article Content

Parichart Chimkhlai
Siriporn Panyametheekul

Abstract

This research aims to analyze language patterns in hate speech found in comments on YouTube about Rohingya refugees in Thailand and Syrian refugees in Europe. Data were collected from 4,113 comments in Thai and 13,960 comments in English and appeared on a video-sharing website specifically from news clips about Rohingya refugees in Thailand during the year 2015-2019 and news on Syrian refugees in Europe during 2013-2019. After applying critical discourse analysis theory on the data, three types of hate speech were found: 1) name calling; 2) verb phrases; and 3) modifiers. The hate speech addresses race, religion, gender, body shape, taste, potential, ability, and individual or group identity. There were five types of name-calling, namely regarding race, religion, threats, animals/evil, and being unwanted; three types of verbs, namely danger/threats, behaviors/actions, and eviction/expulsion; and two types of modifiers, namely degrading quality and degree intensity. The three sets of vocabulary equally form hate speech in Thai and in English. In both languages, refugees are portrayed as villains, devalued as unwanted, dangerous, and offensive. Modifiers are used to magnify the degree of intensity driven by the underlying emotional implications.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chimkhlai, P. ., & Panyametheekul, S. . (2024). Hate Speech in YouTube Comments on Rohingya Refugees in Thailand and Syrian Refugees in Europe. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 133–161. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/270379
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Parichart Chimkhlai, Faculty of Humanities, Linguistics Program, Srinakharinwirot University

A graduate student of doctor of Philosophy (Linguistics), Faculty of Humanities, Linguistics Program, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand

Siriporn Panyametheekul, Faculty of Humanities, Linguistics in Digital Communication Program, Srinakharinwirot University

An associate professor at the Faculty of Humanities, Linguistics in Digital Communication Program, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand

References

ABC News. (2015, December 22). Anti-immigrant protests grow as refugees flood Europe |ABC News [Video].YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bb0OYWY6V5g

Alkomah, F., & Ma, X. (2022). A literature review of textual hate speech detection methods and datasets. Information, 13(6), 273.

Alkiviadou, N. (2019). Hate speech on social media networks: towards a regulatory framework?. Information & Communications Technology Law,

(1), 19-35.

Almagor, R. (2011). Fighting hate and bigotry on the Internet. Policy & Internet, 3(3), 1-26.

Amnesty International. (2018). Syria, https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/middle-east- and-north- africa/syria/reportsyria/?fbclid=IwAR0HdXxnj64Q4BDV4rsqh3at 1mhuRA12fZXCnvjmt6OH HG3YJDchSOl0hDQ

Amnesty International Thailand. (2560). ผู้ลี้ภัย, https://www.amnesty.or.th/our-work/refugees /?fbclid=IwAR1SbFK7pNfyumZ0IVwQqUv_RIBXPcLurj1eEipO UZUooEG4cxwlSjKkzNA

Amnesty International Thailand. (2560). คลังข้อมูล, https://www.amnesty.or.th/resources/

Aslan, A. (2017). Online hate discourse: A study on hated speech directed against Syrian refugees on Youtube. Journal of Media Critiques [JMC], 3(12).

Assimakopoulos, S., Baider, F. H., & Millar, S. L. (2017). Online hate speech in the European Union: A discourse-analytic perspective. Springer. Springer Briefs in Linguistics

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72604-5.

Ataman, H. (2012). Nefret suçlarını farklı yaklaşımlar cerçevesinde ele almak: etik, sosyo-politik ve bir insan hakları problemi olarak nefret suçları. yasemin inceoğlu (Ed.), Nefret Söylemi ve/veya Nefret Suçları içinde, (s.47- 81). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları, 2012.

Ayansola, A. O. (2021). A study of pragmatic acts and hate speech strategies

in Christian sermons in Nigeria. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 10(2),

-220.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Bakalis, C., & Hornle, J. (2021). The role of social media companies in the regulation of online hate speech. Studies in law, politics, and society. Emerald Publishing Limited.

BBC News. (2017, March 23). The Syrian refugees turning to sex to survive - BBC News [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZqHUBkLv4E

Bearing Arms’ Cam & Co. (2015, September 9). An illegal immigrant catastrophe. . . in Europe? ISIS refugees! [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRyY5vYZzJQ

Brenton, Angela Laird. (1993). Demystifying the magic of language: Critical linguistic case analysis of legitimation of authority. Journal of Applied Communication Research 21(August), 227-44.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge university press.

CaspianReport. (2015, November 24). Europe’s refugee crisis explained [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKxJmjIxZDA

Channel 4 News. (2015b, September 4). Refugee crisis: Hundreds begin march to Austria [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6Uk5TJpEs8

Chetty, N., & Alathur, S. (2018). Hate speech review in the context of online social networks. Aggression and Violent Bahavior, 40, 108-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.003.

CNN. (2013, June 21). Syrian refugees marrying young teenagers [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dR7Bxp3ajj0

Destutt de Tracy, A. L. C. D. (1803). Elemens d'ideologie: Grammaire (Vol. 2). Courcier.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Language and power. Routledge.

Fairclough, N. L., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed), Discourse studies. A multidisciplinary introduction, Vol.2. Discourse as social interaction (pp. 258-84). Sage.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 5(11), 121- 138.

Gelber, K. (2002). Speaking back: The free speech versus hate speech debate (Vol. 1). John Benjamins Publishing.

Grice, H. Paul (1975). Logic and conversation. In syntax and semantics: Speech acts, ed. Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41-50. Academic Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Hodder Arnold.

Hassan, A. F., & Muhammed, W. S. M. (2022). A critical pragmatic study of hate speech in some selected American movies. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(6), 5338-5354.

Hodsdon, C. B. (2000). A lexico-semantic feature analysis of racist hate discourse. The University of Texas at Arlington.

Martins, R., Gomes, M., Almeida, J. J., Novais, P., & Henriques, P. (2018, October). Hate speech classification in social media using emotional analysis. In 2018 7th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS) (pp. 61-66). IEEE.

Mehboob, N., & Alvi, U. (2021). An analysis of hate speech tweets against women from a socio-cognitive discourse perspective. University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 5, 128-146.

Misinformation – World Health Organization – Medium. (2020, October 22). Medium. https://medium.com/who/tagged/misinformation

Miro-Llinares, F., & Rodriguez-Sala, J. J. (2016). Cyber hate speech on twitter: Analyzing disruptive events from social media to build a violent communication and hate speech taxonomy. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 11(3), 406-415.

NBC News. (2015, September 3). Stirring images of syrian boy’s body now symbol of europe’s crisis |NBC Nightly News [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=286cPY8BiwI

O’Regan, C. (2018). Hate speech online: an (intractable) contemporary challenge?. Current legal problems, 71(1), 403-429.

Panyametheekul, S. (2015). Language in internet chat rooms. Manutsat Paritat, 27, 63-71.

Piwawattanapanich, P. (2015). ถ้อยคำแห่งความเกลียดชัง (Hate speech) กับกฎหมายสิทธิ มนุษยชนระหว่างประเทศ.(ออนไลน์). เข้าถึงได้จาก https://prachatai.com/journal/2013/12/50732

PPTV36 [Around the World]. (2017c). รอบโลก By กรุณา บัวคำศรี - โรฮิงญา คนที่โลกไม่ ต้องการ (3/3) [Video]. Youtube. Retrieved December 29, 2017, from https://youtube/3N-in-S8P3o

PPTV36 [Around the World]. (2018c, January 9). รอบโลก By กรุณา บัวคำศรี – เสียง จากพม่า โรฮิงญาคือใคร (3/3) [Video]. Youtube. https://youtu.be/CfVNpFG-umA

Ramasuta, P. (2015). ประทุษวาจากับโลกออนไลน์. กรุงเทพมหานคร: มูลนิธิเพื่อการศึกษา ประชาธิปไตยและการพัฒนา (โครงการจัดพิมพ์คบไฟ).

RT. (2014, December 21). “We don’t need everyone”: Syrian refugees abandoned in Europe [Video]. YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdlQoDNOqU

Sammitinews. (2013, January 14). ข่าว3มิติ ชาวโรฮิงยา 130113 [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blyhCkEgxJM

Sedler, R. (1992). The unconstitutionality of campus bans of “racist speech.” the view from without and within. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 53: 631-83.

Seglow, J. (2016). Hate speech, dignity and self-respect. Ethical theory and moral practice, 19, 1103–1116.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9744-3.

Simpson, P. (1993). Language, ideology and point of view. Routledge.

SpokeDark TV. (2015, May 22). เจาะข่าวตื้น 153 : โลกสวยนักเรอะ ? รับโรฮิงญาไปเลี้ยงสัก คนสองคนไหมล่ะ ?[Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3UC33XkXEk

Spring News. (2017, July 21). เปิดชีวิตโรฮิงญาในแผ่นดินไทย - Springnews [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfKNMneF0zo

Spring News. (2017a, February 5)."โรฮิงญา" จับอาวุธต่อต้านรัฐบาลเมียนมา [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BI-qZ-ucN7U

TDC. (2015, September 12). Europe’s refugee crisis explained [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v13kTeAHY

Thai PBS. (2017, September 23). ชาวโรฮิงญา 6 แสนคนต้องแย่งชิงอาหารในค่ายผู้อพยพ (23 ก.ย. 60) [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPQbffBuVYc

Thai PBS. (2017a, September 6). ที่นี่ Thai PBS : เสียงสะท้อนโรฮิงญาในไทย “หยุดฆ่าล้างเผ่าพันธุ์” (6 ก.ย. 60) [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QciagaX5KEk

Thai PBS. (2018, February 19). กองทัพปลดปล่อยโรฮิงญา : เปิดปม [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irvyPr4hJuo

Thai PBS. (2018b, August 28). ที่นี่ Thai PBS : เสนอรัฐบาลไทยแก้ปัญหาวิกฤตโรฮิงญา (28 ส.ค. 61) [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CM9xOFfk3qQ

The Guardian. (2015, September 10). We walk together: a syrian refugee family’s journey to the heart of Europe [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubGhzVdnhQw

The Guardian. (2017b, August 2). Escape from Syria: Rania’s odyssey [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDHwt-ooAi4

TNN Online. (2015, June 2). โรฮิงญาทุบเรือนนอนไม่พอใจจนท. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYm5lDZd_YA

TODAY – Today News Agency. (2017c, November 20). เปิดที่มาที่ไป คำอธิบาย “โรฮิงญาคือใคร” | workpointTODAY [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54-XsF9Rh1k

Van Dijk, T. A. (1984). Prejudice in discourse: An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. John Benjamins Publishing.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1987). Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Sage Publications.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1991). Racism and the Press. Routledge.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. Sage Publications.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & society, 4(2), 249-283.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Cognitive context models and discourse. Language structure, discourse and the access to consciousness, 12, 189-226.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1999). Discourse and racism. Discourse and Society, 10, 145- 159.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Discourse, ideology and context. Folia lingüística: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae, 35(1), 11-40.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2(1), 62-86.

Workpoint [Workpoint TV]. (2017, September 9). โรฮิงญาคือใคร ทำไมคนพม่าถึงเรียกโรฮิงญาว่าเบงกาลี ทำความเข้าใจวิกฤตโรฮิงญา” [Video]. Youtube. https://youtu.be/1dnzxCydreQ