Scaffold the Writing of Argumentative Texts to Undergraduate Students through Genre-based Pedagogy

Main Article Content

Iskandar Abdul Samad
Siti Sarah Fitriani
Yunisrina Qismullah Yusuf
Syamsul Bahri Ys

Abstract

English is a demanding language for EFL students especially ones without access to additional support like tutorials, extra classes, and opportunities to use English in their daily lives. Scaffolding the writing process for students and making automatic use of genre knowledge would help them improve their English writing performance. Little is known about how genre knowledge with scaffolding instruction can help undergraduate students write an argumentative text in English that is composed of complex stages and sub-stages, for them to write a good thesis. This study aims to explore if the use of scaffolded genre-based pedagogy applied in a writing process can improve the argumentative writing skills of undergraduate students. This study employs two-cycle action research involving 25 students enrolling in Argumentative Writing subject at the university. An observation form and documentation are used as the research instruments. Data from the observation and documentation were analyzed qualitatively. The results of the analysis have indicated that scaffolding students to write argumentative texts based on the genre of the text has assisted them in developing their writing skills.

Article Details

How to Cite
Samad, I. A. ., Sarah Fitriani, S., Qismullah Yusuf, Y., & Bahri Ys, S. (2024). Scaffold the Writing of Argumentative Texts to Undergraduate Students through Genre-based Pedagogy. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(2), 196–222. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/274079
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Iskandar Abdul Samad, English Education Department, Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia

An Associate Professor at English Education Postgraduate Study Program of Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. His research interests include genre analysis and communicative language teaching.

Siti Sarah Fitriani, English Education Department, Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia

An Associate Professor at English Education Postgraduate Study Program of Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Her research interests include metacognition and reading comprehension.

Yunisrina Qismullah Yusuf, English Education Department, Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia

A Professor at English Education Postgraduate Study Program of Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Her research interests are in the field of linguistics, English education, and literature.

Syamsul Bahri Ys, English Education Department, Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia

An Associate Professor at English Education Department of Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. His research interests are in the field of Teaching English to Young Learners and English Education.

References

Abbas, F., Rana, A. M. K., Bashir, I., Bhatti, A. M. (2021). The English language proficiency as a global employment skill: The viewpoint of Pakistani academia. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 9(3), 1071-1077.

Abrar, M., Mukminin, A., Habibi, A., Asyrafi, F., & Marzulina, L. (2018). " If our English isn't a language, what is it?" Indonesian EFL student teachers' challenges speaking English. The Qualitative Report, 23(1), 129-145.

Albana, H. H., Marzuki, A. G., Alek, A., & Hidayat, D. N. (2020). Cohesive devices in student’s writing (A discourse analysis on argumentative text). Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 8(1), 6-11.

Altikriti, S. (2022). Challenges facing Jordanian undergraduates in writing graduation research paper. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 58-67.

Bulqiyah, S., Mahbub, M. A., & Nugraheni, D. A. (2021). Investigating writing difficulties in essay writing: Tertiary students’ perspectives. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 4(1), 61-73.

Chen, F. (2021). Exploring students’ perceptions and attitudes towards genre-based pedagogy developed in persuasive writing teaching: The systemic functional linguistics perspective. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 12(4), 243-258.

Christie, F. (2013). Genres and genre theory: A response to Michael Rosen. Changing English, 20(1), 11-22.

Coe, R. M., & Freedman, A. (1998). Genre theory: Australian and North American approaches. Theorizing Composition: A Critical Sourcebook of Theory and Scholarship in Contemporary Composition Studies, 136-147.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5thEds.). Routledge Falmer.

Coleman, R., & Goldenberg, C. (2010). What does research say about effective practices for English learners? Part IV: Models for schools and districts. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 46(4), 156-163.

Derewianka, B. (2003). Trends and issues in genre-based approaches. RELC Journal, 34(2), 133-154.

Ellis, R., Johnson, K. E., Henry, A., & Roseberry, R. L. (1998). An evaluation of a genre‐based approach to the teaching of EAP/ESP writing. TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 147-156.

Firkins, A., Forey, G., & Sengupta, S. (2007). Teaching writing to low proficiency EFL students. ELT Journal, 61(4), 341-352.

Flowerdew, L. (2000). Using a genre-based framework to teach organizational structure in academic writing. ELT Journal, 54(4), 369-378.

Ganapathy, M., Kaur, M., Jamal, M., & Phan, J. (2022). The effect of a genre-based pedagogical approach on Orang Asli students’ EFL writing performance. Malaysian Journal of Learning & Instruction, 19(1), 85-113.

Gill, A. A., & Janjua, F. (2020). Genre pedagogy and ELLs’ writing skills: A theme analysis. English Language Teaching, 13(8), 141-151.

Haerazi, H., & Irawan, L. A. (2019). Practicing genre-based language teaching model to improve students’ achievement of writing skills. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 4(1), 9-18.

Hawari, O. M. A., Shboul, Y., & Huwari, I. F. (2021). Supervisors’ perspectives on graduate students’ problems in academic writing. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 545 – 556.

Ho, D. G. E. (2009). Systemic text analysis in the ESL writing classroom: Does it work? RELC Journal, 40(3), 333-359.

Johns, A. M. (Ed.). (2002). Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. Oxfordshire: Routledge.

Kindenberg, B. (2021). Fixed and flexible, correct and wise: A case of genre-based content-area writing. Linguistics and Education, 64, 100938.

Kuzmenkova, J., & Erykina, M. (2022). Complex genre-based methodology for teaching academic writing. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 10(1), 37-55.

Luu, T. T. (2011). Teaching writing through genre-based approach. BELT-Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 2(1), 121-136.

Macken-Horarik, M. (2002). Something to shoot for: A systemic functional approach to teaching genre in secondary school science. Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives, 17-42.

Martin, J. R. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 10-21.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007) Interacting with text: The Role of Dialogue in Learning to Read and Write. Foreign Languages in China, 4(5), 66-80.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2012). Genres and texts: Living in the real world. Indonesian Journal of SFL, 1(1), 1-21.

McGrath, L., Negretti, R., & Nicholls, K. (2019). Hidden expectations: Scaffolding subject specialists’ genre knowledge of the assignments they set. Higher Education, 78(5), 835-853.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage publications.

Paltridge, B. (2014). Genre and second-language academic writing. Language Teaching, 47(03), 303-318.

Pawan, F. (2008). Content-area teachers and scaffolded instruction for English language learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(6), 1450-1462.

Poedjiastutie, D., & Oliver, R. (2017). English learning needs of ESP learners: Exploring stakeholder perceptions at an Indonesian University. TEFLIN Journal, 28(1), 1-21.

Römhild, A., Kenyon, D., & MacGregor, D. (2011). Exploring domain-general and domain-specific linguistic knowledge in the assessment of academic English language proficiency. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(3), 213-228.

Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. London: Equinox.

Sarwat, S., Ullah, N., Anjum, H. M. S., & Bhuttah, T. M. (2021). Problems and factors affecting students English writing skills at elementary level. Ilkogretim Online - Elementary Education Online, 20(5), 3079-3086.

Schaffner, E., Schiefele, U., & Ulferts, H. (2013). Reading amount as a mediator of the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 369-385.

Schneer, D. (2014). Rethinking the argumentative essay. TESOL Journal, 5(4), 619-653.

Stringer, E. T. (2004). Action research in education. Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Teng, F. (2019). A comparison of text structure and self-regulated strategy instruction for elementary school students’ writing. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 18(3), 281-297.

Vygotsky, L. (1987). Thinking and Speaking. Plenum Press.

Wang, W. (2017). Learner characteristics in an EAP thesis-writing class: Looking into students' responses to genre-based instruction and pedagogical tasks. English for Specific Purposes, 47, 52-60.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89-100.

Worden, D. (2018). Balancing stability and flexibility in genre-based writing instruction: A case study of a novice L2 writing teacher. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 44-57.