Voices of the Future: Exploring Students’ Views on the Use of GenAI in Academic and Professional PR Writing
Main Article Content
Abstract
As generative AI (GenAI) policies in higher education in Thailand have been introduced, inquiries regarding GenAI integration and adoption in teaching and learning have been raised. Delving into a relatively unexplored interdisciplinary area in this context, this study aimed to investigate students’ responses towards the use of GenAI in academic and professional public relations (PR) writing, employing the Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) frameworks. This qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured focus group sessions among native Thai PR major university students, with a workshop on GenAI prior to the discussion on its adoption. The findings revealed that all participants were aware of GenAI and most had utilized it for daily and academic purposes, but never in professional PR writing. Despite having positive attitudes towards its use after the trial, they recognized certain drawbacks and concerns and expressed some reservations towards adopting GenAI in their future academic and professional PR writing, rather in English than in Thai. Besides knowledge and perceptions, individual characteristics were also attributed to hindering GenAI adoption among some participants. Therefore, providing adequate resources and practical guidelines on appropriate GenAI use are crucial. Future research in other subject areas and languages is suggested.
Article Details
References
Adarkwah, M. A., Amponsah, S., van Wyk, M. M., Huang, R., Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Saleh Metwally, A. H., & Wang, H. (2023). Awareness and acceptance of ChatGPT as a generative conversational AI for transforming education by Ghanaian Academics: A two-phase study. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.26
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A Conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204-215. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23010927.pdf
Bao, Y., & Li, B. (2023). A preliminary study on graduate student instructors' exploration, perception, and use of ChatGPT. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 13(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.332873
Baytak, A. (2023). The Acceptance and diffusion of generative artificial intelligence in education: A Literature review. Current Perspectives in Educational Research, 6(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.46303/cuper.2023.2
Bernabei, M., Colabianchi, S., Falegnami, A., & Costantino, F. (2023). Students’ use of large language models in engineering education: A Case study on technology acceptance, perceptions, efficacy, and detection chances. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100172
Bourne, C. (2019). AI cheerleaders: Public relations, neoliberalism and artificial intelligence. Public Relations Inquiry, 8(2), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X19835250
Bruhn, K., McCoy, A., Snider, C., Stoldt, R. & Wilson, J. (2023). ChatGPT in the classroom: Using the latest technology to explore innovation and ethics. Journal of Public Relations Education, 9(2), 75-82. https://journalofpreducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/JPRE-92-Bruhn_McCoy_Snider_Stoldt_Wilson.pdf
Buhmann, A., & White, C. L. (2022). Artificial intelligence in public relations: Role and implications. In J. H. Lipschultz, K. Freberg, & R. Luttrell (Eds.), The Emerald handbook of computer-mediated communication and social media (pp. 625-638). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80071-597-420221036
Burkhard, M. (2022). Student perception of AI-powered writing tools: towards Individualized teaching strategies. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age (CELDA). https://doi.org/10.33965/celda2022_202207l010
Chan, C. K. Y. & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Chang, T. S., Li, Y., Huang, H. W., & Whitfield, B. (2021). Exploring EFL students' writing performance and their acceptance of AI-Based automated writing feedback. In Proceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference on Education Development and Studies (pp. 31-35).
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches. 4th edition. Sage.
Dakakni, D., & Safa, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the L2 classroom: Implications and challenges on ethics and equity in higher education: A 21st century Pandora's box. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100179
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Flick, U. (2014). An Introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.
Gallacher, A., Thompson, A., & Howarth, M. (2018). “My Robot is an Idiot!” - Students’ perceptions of AI in the L2 classroom. Research presentation at EUROCALL International Convention, Jyväskylä, Finland. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.26.815
Granić, A., & Marangunic, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572-2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533
Idroes, G. M., Noviandy, T. R., Maulana, A., Irvanizam, I., Jalil, Z., Lensoni, L., Lala, A., Abas, A. H., Tallei, T. E., & Idroes, R. (2023). Student perspectives on the role of artificial intelligence in education: A Survey-based analysis. Journal of Educational Management and Learning, 1(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.60084/jeml.v1i1.58
Imsa-ard, P., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2023). Language assessment literacy: A Preliminary survey of Thai EFL university lecturers’ language assessment knowledge, beliefs, and practices. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 66, 37-80. https://www.culi.chula.ac.th/Images/asset/pasaa_journal/file-71-887-z93djk716327.pdf
Khare, K., Stewart, B. & Khare, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the student experience: an institutional perspective. IAFOR Journal of Education, 6(3), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.6.3.04
Khatri, V., & Brown, C. V. (2010). Designing data governance. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 148-152. https://doi.org/10.1145/1629175.1629210
Kulviwat, S., C. Bruner II, G., & P. Neelankavil, J. (2014). Self-efficacy as an antecedent of cognition and affect in technology acceptance. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 31(3), 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2013-0727
Labrague, L. J., Aguilar-Rosales, R., Yboa, B. C., & Sabio, J. B. (2023). Factors influencing student nurses' readiness to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) in their studies and their perceived barriers to accessing AI technology: A cross-sectional study. Nurse education today, 130, 105945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105945
Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., Darwis, A., & Marzuki. (2023). Exploring artificial intelligence in academic essay: Higher education student's perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open. 5, 100296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296
Mohammed, A. A. Q., Al-ghazali, A., & Alqohfa, K. A. S. (2023). Exploring ChatGPT uses in higher studies: A case study of Arab postgraduates in India. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(2), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i2.55
Moore, J. H. (2006). The nature, importance, and difficulty of machine ethics. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(4), 18-21. http://doi.org/10.119/MIS.2006.80
Ngo, T. T. A. (2023). The perception by university students of the use of ChatGPT in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 18(17), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.39019
Office of Academic Affairs, Chulalongkorn University. (2023). Chulalongkorn University principles and guidelines for using AI Tools. https://academic.chula.ac.th/storage/images/news/64b63eb35dce9.pdf
Panda, G., Upadhyay, A. K., & Khandelwal, K. (2019). Artificial intelligence: A strategic disruption in public relations. Journal of Creative Communications, 14(3), 196-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258619866585
Raman, R., Mandal, S., Das, P., Kaur, T., Sanjanasri, J. P., & Nedungadi, P. (2023). University students as early adopters of ChatGPT: Innovation Diffusion Study. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2734142/v1
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Simon & Schuster.
Ryan, S. (2024). Generative AI in the classroom: Teaching a critical skill for the public relations writing student. Journal of Public Relations Education, 9(3), 25-45. https://journalofpreducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/3-JPRE_93_Ryan_PDF.pdf
Sahin, I. (2006). Detailed review of Rogers' diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology-related studies based on Rogers' theory. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 14-23. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1102473.pdf
Schneider, E. J. (2023). Challenging AI in the PR Classroom. Journal of Public Relations Education, 9(2), 60-67. https://journalofpreducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/JPRE-92-Schneider.pdf
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontier Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
Utami, S. P. T., Andayani, Winarni, R., & Sumarwati. (2023). Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive?. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep450. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419
Uzumcu, O., & Acilmis, H. (2023). Do innovative teachers use AI-powered tools more interactively? A study in the context of diffusion of innovation theory. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09687-1
Vankatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1994). Modeling the determinants of perceived ease of use. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 213-227).
Zaineldeen, S., Hongbo, L., Koffi, A. L., Mohammed, B. & Hassan, B. (2020). Technology acceptance model’ concepts, contribution, limitation, and adoption in education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5061-5071. http://dx.doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081106
Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: a multigroup analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7
Zou, M., & Huang, L. (2023). To use or not to use? understanding doctoral students’ acceptance of ChatGPT in writing through technology acceptance model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1259531. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259531
Zou, X., Su, P., Li, L., & Fu, P. (2023). AI-generated content tools and students’ critical thinking: Insights from a Chinese university. IFLA Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352231214963