Online English Grammar Instruction at a Thai University during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Study

Main Article Content

Apakorn Chamavit
Vajjaganh Suriyatham

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic, which began in early 2020, had a significant impact on education worldwide, including the adoption and acceleration of online learning in the English language curriculum. This mixed-methods study aims to explore the opportunities and challenges encountered by a group of Thai university students (n = 33) while learning English grammar online. The participants were given pre- and post-tests involving eight English tenses in addition to quantifiers, all conducted through three phases. These grammar points were based on the set textbooks they were using in class. Findings suggest that, as far as quantitative analysis is concerned, the participants’ grammar knowledge was increased satisfactorily, albeit through online instruction. Further, students’ behavior while the classes were in session varied considerably. This might have been a result of socio-economic status affecting their access to technological resources deemed relevant in online education.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chamavit, A., & Suriyatham, V. (2024). Online English Grammar Instruction at a Thai University during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Study . LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(2), 745–765. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/274153
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Apakorn Chamavit, Language and Academic Service Center, International College for Sustainability Studies, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand

a lecturer at Language and Academic Service Center, International College for Sustainability Studies, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand with interests in material development, spoken language, language and culture, sociolinguistics, and translation.

Vajjaganh Suriyatham, Language Institute, Thammasat University, Thailand

an assistant professor at the Language Institute of Thammasat University, Thailand, with interests in exploratory practice, learner autonomy, material development, listening processing and strategies, English pronunciation, spoken language, language and culture, and sociolinguistics.

References

Abdukarimova, N. A., & Zubaydova, N. N. (2021). Deductive and inductive approaches to teaching grammar. JournalNX, 372-376. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/343275-deductive-and-inductive-approaches-to-te-f0998821.pdf

Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students' perspectives. Online Submission, 2(1), 45-51. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED606496.pdf

Anggrawan, A., Yassi, A. H., Satria, C., Arafah, B., & Makka, H. M. (2019, April 11-13). Comparison of online learning versus face to face learning in English grammar learning. 2019 5th International Conference on Computing Engineering and Design (ICCED), Singapore (pp. 1-4). IEEE. https://10.1109/ICCED46541.2019.9161121

Apse, V., & Farneste, M. (2021). Challenges and Opportunities of English Grammar Acquisition by Distance at the Tertiary Level. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture. 11. 4-20. https://10.22364/BJELLC.11.2021.01.

Arakkitsakul, Y. (2019). Five things that Thai teachers have to consider before teaching English grammar. Journal of Southern Technology, 12(2), 257-263. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journal_sct/article/view/153086/154002

Bakka, V. (2018). Differences between Prescriptive and Descriptive Grammars: Contexts of Use. International Journal of Information Movement, 2, 32-35. https://ijim.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Vol-2-Issue-X-32-35-Paper-814-Vinod-B.pdf

Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & Del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and information technologies, 26(6), 7321-7338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x

Burton, G. (2017). Personal Best, B1 + Intermediate: Student’s book. Richmond

Chen, L. H. (2023). Moving Forward: International Students’ Perspectives of Online Learning Experience During the Pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, Article 100276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100276

Faturoti, B. (2022). Online learning during COVID19 and beyond: A human right based approach to internet access in Africa. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 36(1), 68-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2022.2030027

Galotti, K. M., Komatsu, L. K., & Voelz, S. (1997). Children's differential performance on deductive and inductive syllogisms. Developmental psychology, 33(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.33.1.70

George, T. (2023, June 22). What Is an Observational Study? | Guide & Examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/observational-study/

Gerngross, G., Puchta, H., & Thonbury, S. (2006). Teaching grammar creatively. Cambridge University Press.

Halim, T., Wahid, R., & Halim, S. (2021, November). Challenges of teaching and learning grammar in online classes at the tertiary level. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(3), 212-221. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v10i3.47970

Hammerly, H. (1975). The Deduction/Induction Controversy. The Modern Language Journal, 59(1/2), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/325441

Irawan, A. W., Dwisona, D., & Lestari, M. (2020). Psychological impacts of students on online learning during the pandemic COVID-19. KONSELI: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling (E-Journal), 7(1), 53-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/kons.v7i1.6389

Ivankova, N. V., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Teaching mixed methods

research: using a socio-ecological framework as a pedagogical approach for addressing the complexity of the field. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(4), 409-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1427604

Kachru, B.B. (ed.) (1992) The Other Tongue: English across Cultures, 2nd ed. Illinois University Press.

Kapranov, O. (2022) EFL Students’ Perceptions of an Online Course in Advanced Grammar: Affordances, Challenges, and Implications. HRADEC KRÁLOVÉ JOURNAL OF ANGLOPHONE STUDIES, 9(1-2), 47-63. http://pdf.uhk.cz/hkjas/

Khan, B. (1997). Web-based training. Educational Technology Publications.

Khodabandeh, F., & Tharirian, M. H. (2020). Exploring the Impact of Blended, Flipped, and Traditional Teaching Strategies for Teaching Grammar on Iranian EFL Learners through English Newspaper Articles. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 39(3.1), 89-129. http://10.22099/jtls.2020.38443.2883

Labrović, J. A., Petrović, N., Anđelković, J., & Meršnik, M. (2023). Patterns of behavioral engagement in an online English language course: cluster analysis. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09382-1

Macon, D. K. (2011). Student satisfaction with online courses versus traditional courses: A meta-analysis. Northcentral University.

Mahjoob, E. (2015). A comparison of the effectiveness of inductive vs. deductive instruction of grammar to EFL students. Journal of Language, Linguistics and Literature, 1(5), 164-169. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Elham-Mahjub/publication/283296103_A_Comparison_of_the_Effectiveness_of_Inductive_vs_Deductive_Instruction_of_Grammar_to_EFL_Students/links/56312bd708ae3de9381cec29/A-Comparison-of-the-Effectiveness-of-Inductive-vs-Deductive-Instruction-of-Grammar-to-EFL-Students.pdf

Nartiningrum, N., & Nugroho, A. (2020). Online learning amidst global pandemic: EFL students’ challenges, suggestions, and needed materials. ENGLISH FRANCA: Academic journal of English language and education, 4(2), 115-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/ef.v4i2.1494

Negahdaripour, S., & Amirghassemi, A. (2016). The effect of deductive vs.

inductive grammar instruction on Iranian EFL learners’ spoken accuracy and fluency. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.1p.8

Ogwudile, C. E. (2022). The Position of Grammar in English Language Teaching. Nigerian Journal of African Studies (NJAS), 4(1), 57-62. https://www.nigerianjournalsonline.com/index.php/NJAS/article/view/2450/2382

Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search conditions, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27-67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014674

Sasomsub, I., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2021). A study of EFL teachers’ and students’ attitude toward prescriptive and descriptive English grammar teaching and learning [Unpublished master thesis]. Thammasat University).

Saengboon, S. (2017). English Grammar and Thai University Students: An Insurmountable Linguistic Battle? English Language Teaching, 10(11), 22-36. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n11p22

Seliger, H. W. (1975). Inductive method and deductive method in language teaching: A re-examination. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 13, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1975.13.1-4.1

Serdyukov, P., & Serdyukova, N. (2012). Time as factor of success in online learning. Journal of Information Technology and Application in Education, 1(2), 40-46. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Peter-Serdyukov-2/publication/268516503_Time_as_Factor_of_Success_in_Online_Learning/links/54f67a4f0cf21d8b8a5c8d3f/Time-as-Factor-of-Success-in-Online-Learning.pdf

Sik, K. (2015). Tradition or modernism in grammar teaching: deductive vs. inductive approaches. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 2141-2144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.340

Sioson, I. C. (2021). Attitudes of Thai English Learners towards Online Learning of Speaking. Education and development conference 2021, Belgrade, Serbia. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Satoshi_Ishida4/publication/357376410_Remote_Learning_Responses_to_the_COVID-19_Situation_in_Creating_Collaborative_Learning_Environment_Cases_from_Nagasaki's_Public_Schools/links/643604e2ad9b6d17dc51a9ae/Remote-Learning-Responses-to-the-COVID-19-Situation-in-Creating-Collaborative-Learning-Environment-Cases-from-Nagasakis-Public-Schools.pdf#page=19

Sukman, K., & Mhunkongdee, T. (2021). Thai EFL learners’ voices on learning English online during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(2), 1-9. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Krittat-Sukman-2/publication/350868749_Thai_EFL_Learners'_Voices_on_Learning_English_Online_during_the_COVID-19_Pandemic/links/60846f9c881fa114b4276ff3/Thai-EFL-Learners-Voices-on-Learning-English-Online-during-the-COVID-19-Pandemic.pdf

Tan, S. F., Ooi, L. H., Ng, L. Y. M., & Sim, T. Y. (2024). Undergraduates’ perception, engagement and learning experience in online learning amid Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Instruction, 17(2), 401-418. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17223a

Wighting, M. J., Liu, J., & Rovai, A. P. (2008). Distinguishing sense of community and motivation characteristics between online and traditional college students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(3). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=9abd54f28f1fe3670675446ebbe19d579f6b155e

Yang, K. C. C., & Kang, Y. (2020). What can college teachers learn from students’ experiential narratives in hybrid courses?: A text mining method of longitudinal data. Theoretical and practical approaches to innovation in higher education (pp. 91-112). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://10.4018/978-1-7998-1662-1.ch006

Zhou, S., Zhu, H., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Impact of teenage EFL learners’ psychological needs on learning engagement and behavioral intention in synchronous online English courses. Sustainability, 14(17), Article 10468. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710468