Exploring the Effects of Customized CLIL Training on Teacher Competency: Insights from Upper-Secondary Biology Teachers in Myanmar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examined upper-secondary school biology teachers in Myanmar viewed the impact of a customized CLIL teacher training model on their English language knowledge, content knowledge, and teaching skills. Before the training, a needs analysis was conducted to shape the training topics, which were then integrated into this study’s training framework based on Coyle et al.’s (2010) CLIL model. Data collection occurred during and after the training. Questionnaires, interviews, and micro-teaching self-evaluations were used to reflect the perceived impact of the model on teachers’ competency development. Findings showed a positive impact of the model on teachers’ subject content teaching knowledge, language knowledge and skills, as well as pedagogical skills though its effectiveness varied based on teaching experience. This study suggests that the teacher training model should address the unique needs of Myanmar teachers.
Article Details
References
Aung, W., Hardman, F., & Myint, A. A. (2013). Development of a teacher education strategy framework linked to pre-and in-service teacher training in Myanmar. UNICEF, Myanmar.
Ayapova, T., Seidaliyeva, G., Shayakhmetova, D., Bukabayeva, B., & Kemelbekova, Z. (2020). The model of CLIL teacher training and retraining center in the context of multilingual education. Laplage em Revista (International), 7, 528–536.
Ayapova, T., Shayakhmetova, D., Kemelbekova, Z., Bukabayeva, B., & Seidaliyeva, G. (2021). Modeling of teaching content in a foreign language at the university based on CLIL approach. Review of International Geographical Education (RIGEO), 11(5), 4509-4521.
Bertaux, P., Coonan, C. M., Frigols-Martín, M. J., & Mehisto, P. (2010). The CLIL teacher’s competencies grid. Common Constitution and Language Learning (CCLL) Comenius Network. http://cclleu.eu/cms02/fileadmin/daten/Dateien/Konferenzen/THE_CLIL_TE ACHER_latest_version.pdf
Brown, J. D. (2019). The role of perception in language teacher training. ELT Journal, 73(1), 3-12.
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied linguistics, 35(3), 243-262.
Coyle, D. (2008). CLIL: A pedagogical approach from the European perspective. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., 4, pp. 97-111). Springer.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2018). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Coyle, D. (2019). 4Cs. (figure). Retrieved Une 2, 2019 from https://clilingmesoftly.wordpress.com/clil-models-3/the-4-cs-modeldocoyle/.
Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches. 3rd ed. Sage.
Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 3rded. Sage.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. John Benjamins Publishing.
English for Education College Trainers (EfECT Handbook). (2014). British Council, Myanmar: British Council.
Favilli, F., & Gozzini, L. (2013). CLIL in Italy: A survey of research. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 301-321.
Gabillon, Z. (2013). CLIL teacher education: An overview of research. Language Teaching, 46(1), 109-126.
González-Lloret, M., & Ortega-Martín, J. (2021). CLIL teacher training: A systematic review of the literature. Language Teaching Research, 25(1), 5-28.
Hernández, T. (2010). CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J. M. Sierra, & F. Gallardo del Puerto (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 59-76). Multilingual Matters.
Htay, S., & Ngonkum, S. (2023). CLIL teachers training needs: Myanmar upper secondary school biology teachers’ voices. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (HUSOKKU), 40(1), 69–99.
Htay, S., & Nyeinn, M.Y. (2015). CLIL in Myanmar: A case study of a primary school. Journal of Language and Education, 1(1), 1-12.
Hurajova, A. (2013). CLIL teacher education: A review of research. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 1(1), 1-14.
Johns, A. (1991). English for specific purposes: Its history and contribution. In Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (pp. 67-77). Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L.B. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Kalogerakou, K, Baka, M., & Lountzi, M. (2017). A CLIL model: Teaching science at secondary education. Research papers in language Teaching and Learning, 8(2)136-148.
Lee, S. (2018). The challenges of teaching science in English in Myanmar. Journal of Language and Education, 4(1), 1-12.
Marsh, D., Maljers, A., & Hartiala, A. K. (1994). Profiling European CLIL classrooms. European Commission.
Marsh, D. (1999). CLIL/EMILE-The European dimension: Actions, trends, and foresight potential. European Commission.
Marsh, D., Mehisto., Wolff, D., & Frigols, M.J. (2010). European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education. ECML
Marsh, D., & Díaz, W. (2020). A key development indicator matrix for systemizing CLIL in Higher education environments. Developing and Evaluating Quality Bilingual Practices in Higher Education, 1-14.
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M.J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Macmillan.
Ministry of Education. (2004). Development of Education in Myanmar. Myanmar: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education. (2012). Education for all 2015 national review report: Myanmar. Myanmar: Ministry of Education.
Myint, M. (1992). The teaching of English. Myanmar Education Research Bureau.
Nguyen, T. T. H., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2019). CLIL teacher training in Vietnam: A case study. Journal of Language and Education, 5(1), 1-14.
Novotna, J., & Masarova, J. (2001). CLIL: A new challenge for primary teachers. In D. Marsh & G. Langé (Eds.), Implementing content and language integrated learning (pp. 47-56). European Commission.
Piacentini, M. (2021). CLIL teacher education: A systematic review of the literature. Language Teaching Research, 25(1), 29-50.
Prieto, L. & Altmaier, E. (1994). The relationship of prior training and previous teaching experience to self-efficacy among graduate teaching assistants. Research In Higher Education, 35(4), 481-497.
Raitbauer, M., & Schreiner, C. (2018). Digital skills in CLIL teacher education: A systematic review. Language Teaching Research, 22(6), 696-719.
Robinson, P. (2017). English as a medium of instruction in Asia: Implications for policy and practice. Routledge.
Sanchez-Melendez, A. (2020). CLIL teachers training needs in primary education in Andalusia. [n.p.]: Universidad De Córdoba.
Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. 3rded. London: Sage.
Smith, E (2020). Afterword: a fresh look at workplace learning for VET teachers, International Journal of Training Research, 18(1), 84-92. http://doi: 10.1080/14480220.2020.1757890.
Soe, T., & Myint, S. (2020). Attitudes towards English as a medium of instruction (EMI): A case study of University of Mandalay. University of Mandalay Research Journal, 11, 108-115.
Signori, T. Y., Drajati, N. A ., & Putra, K. A. (2024). Indonesian non- ELT pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy in EMI context: Voices from international teaching practicum in Thailand. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 416–439.
Taylor, P. (2022). Perceptions of in-service teachers towards CLIL and CLIL teachers’ target language and intercultural competences: The context of English-medium instruction schools in Thailand. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 565–587. https://so04.tcithaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/256738
Thompson, G., & Cook, I. (2014). Education policy-making and time. Journal of Education Policy, 29(5), 700-715.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2002). The influence of resources and support on teachers’ efficacy beliefs. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Ulla, M.B. (2017). Teacher training in Myanmar: teachers’ perceptions and implications. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 103–118.
Ulla, M.B. (2018a). English language teacher education in Myanmar: A review of the literature. Journal of Language and Education, 4(1), 1-12.
Ulla, M.B. (2018b). In-service teachers’ training: The case of university teachers in Yangon, Myanmar. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1), 66-77.
Urmeneta, C. E., & Walsh, S. (2017). Classroom interactional competence in content and language integrated learning. Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL, 1, 183-200.
Wagner, T. (2009). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don't teach the new survival skills our children need and what we can do about it. Basic Books.
Watson, J. (2019). The challenges of teaching science in English in Myanmar. Journal of Language and Education, 5(1), 1-12.
Weil, S. (2013). The challenges of teaching science in English in Myanmar. Journal of Language and Education, 1(1), 1-12.
Zydatiß, W. (2007). Bilingual subject teaching in Germany: A review. Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 36, 8-25.