Enhancing L2 Writing: The Role of Feedback and Writing Conferences in Critical Thinking and Argumentation
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Critical thinking is an essential skill for effective L2 writing. By thinking critically, learners can construct well-reasoned arguments, support their claims, and deal with opposing ideas. The role of corrective feedback and feedback conferences is pivotal in this process, because they provide learners with targeted guidance and opportunities for iterative development. This study explored the development of critical thinking skills in L2 learners' writing. Participants were students enrolled in the Intensive English Program of a large university in Türkiye. They had B1 level of English proficiency at the time of the study. A feedback cycle was designed, and primary data were obtained from multiple drafts of students' essays and interviews. To track the development of argumentation in the subsequent drafts of students, a qualitative text analysis was conducted using Stapleton’s (2001) criteria regarding the number of arguments, the extent of evidence, the recognition of opposition, corresponding refutation, and the existence of fallacies. Overall results indicated that L2 learners had substantial difficulty generating arguments and thinking critically. There were few instances of clear arguments, evidence, refutation, and supporting ideas in their drafts. However, the students were really motivated to develop their argumentation skills when appropriate instruction and scaffolding were provided.
Article Details
References
Alagozlu, N. (2007). Critical thinking and voice in EFL writing. Asian EFL Journal, 9(3), 118-136. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/main-editions-new/critical-thinking-and-voice-in-efl-writing/index.htm
Atkinson, D. (1997). A critical approach to critical thinking in
TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 71 94.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3587975
Barnawi, O. Z. (2011). Finding a place for critical thinking and self-voice
in college English as a foreign language writing classrooms. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 190-197. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p190
Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective
feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102-118.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David McKay Company.
Cargas, S., Williams, S., & Rosenberg, M. (2017). An approach to teaching
critical thinking across disciplines using performance tasks with a common rubric. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.05.005
Deane, P., & Song, Y. (2014). A case study in principled assessment design:
Designing assessments to measure and support the development of argumentative reading and writing skills. Psicología Educativa, 20(2), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2014.10.001
Elder, L., & Paul, R. (1994). Critical thinking: Why we must transform our
teaching. Journal of Developmental Education, 18(1), 34-35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42775541
Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory into practice, 32(3), 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543594
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight
Assessment, 1(1), 1-23.
Fenesi, B., Sana, F., & Kim, J. A. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of
combining the use of corrective feedback and high-level practice questions. Teaching of Psychology, 41(2), 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314530344
Forehand, M. (2005). Bloom’s taxonomy: Original and revised. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology (E-Book). https://textbookequity.org/Textbooks/Orey_Emergin_Perspectives_Learning.pdf
Halum, Y. S., & Guna, S. (2021). The manifestation of critical thinking elements in EFL students’ argumentative writing. TELL-US Journal, 7(2), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.22202/tus.2021.v7i2.4913
Hayes, K. D., & Devitt, A. A. (2008). Classroom discussions with student‐
led feedback: A useful activity to enhance development of critical thinking skills. Journal of Food Science Education, 7(4), 65-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4329.2008.00054.x
Hu, G. (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student
writers. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 321-342. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr169oa
Karim, K., & Nassaji, H. (2020). The effects of written corrective
feedback. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 3(1), 28-52.
https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.37949
Keuk, C. N. (2009). Direct form-focused written corrective feedback and
critical thinking in teaching literature in EFL classrooms in Cambodia. In L. J. Zhang, R. Rubdy, & L. Alsagoff (Eds.). Englishes and literatures in English in a globalised world: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on English in Southeast Asia (pp. 208-221). https://www.nlb.gov.sg/main/book-detail?cmsuuid=d9ed0d56-e379-498e-9aa8-4d3b4b02cc90
Kuyyogsuy, S. (2019). Promoting peer feedback in developing students' English writing ability in L2 writing class. International Education Studies, 12(9), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n9p76
Lee, I. (2017). Issues in classroom writing assessment and feedback in L2 school
contexts. Springer.
Liaw, M. L. (2007). Content-based reading and writing for critical thinking
skills in an EFL context. English Teaching and Learning, 31(2), 45-87. https://doi/org/10.6330/ETL.2007.31.2.02
Liu, W., & Zhao, P. (2023). Chinese first-year undergraduates’ strategy use in the English writing from sources task: Influences from genders, critical thinking, and L2 proficiency. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1290312. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1290312
McKinley, J. (2013). Displaying critical thinking in EFL academic writing: A
discussion of Japanese to English contrastive rhetoric. RELC Journal, 44(2), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688213488386
Nejmaoui, N. (2019). Improving EFL learners' critical thinking skills in argumentative writing. English Language Teaching, 12(1), 98-109. https://doi/org/10.5539/elt.v12n1p98
Ramanathan, V., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Some problematic" channels" in
the teaching of critical thinking in current LI composition textbooks:
Implications for L2 student-writers. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 7(2).
https://doi.org/10.5070/L472005242
Reid, S., & Chin, P. (2021). Assessing critical thinking in L2: An exploratory study. Shiken, 21(1), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTSIG.TEVAL25.1-2
Sato, T. (2022). Assessing critical thinking through L2 argumentative essays: An investigation of relevant and salient criteria from raters’ perspectives. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00159-4
Stapleton, P. (2001). Assessing critical thinking in the writing of Japanese
university students: Insights about assumptions and content familiarity. Written Communication, 18(4), 506-548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018004004
Stapleton, P. (2002). Critical thinking in Japanese L2 writing: Rethinking
tired constructs. ELT Journal, 56(3), 250-257. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.3.250
Stapleton, P., & Wu, Y. A. (2015). Assessing the quality of arguments in
students' persuasive writing: A case study analyzing the relationship between surface structure and substance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 17, 12-23. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jeap.2014.11.006
Tsui, L. (2002). Fostering critical thinking through effective pedagogy:
Evidence from four institutional case studies. The Journal of Higher
Education, 73(6), 740-763. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2002.11777179.
Van, N. T. B. (2024). Developing critical thinking skills to teach writing
skills for the third-year English majors at hung yen university of technology and education. Journal of Science – Hanoi Open University, 119, 44-53. https://doi/org/10.59266/houjs.2024.458
