Integrating Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) into Essay Writing Instruction for Low-Achieving Students: A Two-Cycle Collaborative Action Research Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Many educators believe that low-achieving students can’t handle higher-order thinking tasks, which may hinder their growth and potential. This study employed a two-cycle collaborative action research design using a mixed-methods approach, and incorporating classroom observations, teacher interviews, and pre- and post-writing assessments, which were analysed using a paired-samples t-test. The participants were 3 Malay language teachers and 47 low-achieving students, all aged 16, from 3 rural secondary schools in Sarawak, Malaysia. The students’ writing performance was analysed quantitatively, while the teachers participated in classroom implementation, intervention and interview. The classroom observation results indicate that teachers rely more on the analysing cognitive domain. A process-based approach enhances higher-order thinking skills in essay writing among low achievers, thereby improving classroom teaching and learning. There was a significant difference between pre- and post-writing assessments, with average essay scores improving by approximately -19.47 points after the intervention. In conclusion, educators knowledgeable about HOTS cognitive domains play a crucial role in supporting struggling students to foster essay-writing abilities. For low achievers, a process-based approach is more effective than a modular approach for enhancing higher-order thinking in essay writing. Teachers should motivate students at all academic levels to participate in tasks that utilise higher-order thinking skills.
Article Details
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn & Bacon.
Andin, C., & Rosmiza, M. Z. (2023). Teaching higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) across the curriculum: Challenges faced by teachers in implementation. Jurnal Pemikir Pendidikan, 11(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.51200/jpp.v11i1.4280
Arif, S. (2019). Higher order thinking skills (HOTS) analysis on teacher’s questions in the final examination of Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia at Senior High School 7 Medan. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education Journal, 2(4), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v2i4.504
Aziz, F., & Abd Rahman, F. (2018). Sorotan kajian kesediaan dan keperluan guru bahasa Melayu dalam pelaksanaan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT) di bilik darjah. [Literature review on the readiness and needs of Malay language teachers for implementing higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in the classroom]. Pendeta Journal of Malay Language, 9(7), 80-101. https://doi.org/10.37134/pendeta.vol9.7.2018
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans.
Buku Teks Digital. (2020). Skema pemarkahan SPM: Bahasa Melayu. [SPM marking scheme: Malay Language]. Buku Teks Digital. https://bukuteksdigital.my/skema-pemarkahan-spm-bahasa-melayu/
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.
Chew, Z. Y. (2023). Strategies for guaranteed easy and effective HOTS-based teaching and learning in the classroom. Class Point. https://www.classpoint.io/blog/ms/strategi-pdp-kbat-terjamin-senang-dan-efektif-di-bilik-darjah
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hunkins, F. P. (1989). Teaching thinking through effective questioning. Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
Dani, N. A. (2025). Asas psikolinguistik. [Fundamentals of Psycholinguistics]. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Foster, G. E. (1989). Guest editorial: Cultivating the thinking skills of low achievers: A matter of equity. The Journal of Negro Education, 58(4), 461–467. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2295204
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014). Elemen KBAT dalam kurikulum. [HOTS Elements in the curriculum]. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Instrumen standard penarafan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT) dalam pembeajaran dan pengajaran (Pdp). [Standard instrument for rating higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in teaching and learning (T&L)]. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Panduan pendekatan modular dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. [Guide to modular approaches in teaching and learning]. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Malaysia.
Koltovskaia, S. (2023). Postsecondary L2 writing teachers’ use and perceptions of Grammarly as a complement to their feedback. ReCALL, 35(3), 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344022000179
Malaysian Ministry of Education. (2018). Curriculum and assessment standard document for form 4 and 5. Curriculum Development Division.
Mohamed Hata, N. F., & Mahmud, S. N. D. (2020). Kesediaan guru Sains dan Matematik dalam melaksanakan pendidikan STEM dari aspek pengetahuan, sikap dan pengalaman mengajar. [Teachers’ readiness in implementing STEM education from knowledge, attitude and teaching experience aspects]. Akademika, 90(Special Issue 3), 85-101. http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17323/1/42143-140530-1-PB.pdf
Peng, J., Sun, M., Yuan, B., Lim, C. P., Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Wang, M. (2024). Visible thinking to support online project-based learning: Narrowing the achievement gap between high-and low-achieving students. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 2329-2363.
Pillay, L. A. M., Singh, C. K. S., Harun, R. N. S. R., & Singh, T. S. M. (2018). The implementation of higher order thinking skills for teaching and learning. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Special Issue 5, 668–675. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi5.668.675
Raflee, M. S., & Halim, L. (2021). The effectiveness of critical thinking in improving skills in KBAT problem-solving. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 11(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol11.1.6.2021
Salam, M. S. (2019). Penyusunan soal HOTS guru bahasa Indonesia SMP negeri di Kota Tulungagung. [The development of HOTS-based questions by Indonesian language teachers in SMP Tulungagung district]. Jurnal Ilmiah Nosi, 7(2), 119–130. https://jim.unisma.ac.id/index.php/NOSI/article/view/4378
Sinaga, E., Simanjuntak, D. R., Seragih, C., Manurung, E., & Siahaan, B. L. (2023). The effect of higher- order thinking skills (HOTS) questions on student writing skills at SMA Negeri 3 Pematangsiantar. Indonesian Journal of Applied and Industrial Sciences, 2(2), 175-206. https://doi.org/10.55927/esa.v2i2.3303
Sopiani, P.S., Said, I., & Ratnawati. (2019). Investigating students' higher- order thinking skills (HOTS) in writing skills (a case study at the eleventh grade of a senior high school in Banjar). Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET), 3(3), 328-342. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.3.3.328-342
Sun, C., & Feng, G. (2009). Process approach to teaching writing applied in different teaching models. English Language Teaching Journal, 2(1), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v2n1p150
Yahya, M. S. S., Masdar, N. F., & Samat, N. (2020). The degree of perception, evaluation and competency on problem-based learning (PBL) and higher order thinking skills among Form Six students at Pontian district. Perspektif: Jurnal Sains Sosial Dan Kemanusiaan, 12(2), 20–32. https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/PERS/article/view/3610
Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher-order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1
Zohar, A., Degani, A., & Vaaknin, E. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about low-achieving students and higher-order thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(4), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00007-5