From Feeling Incapable to Becoming Agentic: Language Mindset Transformation Through Reflective Dialogue in a Thai EFL Classroom

Main Article Content

Sitah Thayati
Ruedeerath Chusanachoti
Wichai Sawekngam

Abstract

This study investigates how language mindset transforms over time and enables agency development among Thai undergraduate EFL learners. It aims to examine how mindset dimensions change during a reflective dialogue intervention, identify temporal patterns of belief transformation, and explore relationships between these beliefs and agentic behaviors. Employing a multi-method case study design, twenty-five students participated in a six-week intervention; data comprised 100 learning logs and pre-post semi-structured interviews with six focal participants, analyzed using paired-samples t-tests and thematic analysis. All six mindset dimensions—participation, motivation, effort, strategy, failure, and ability—shifted from fixed to growth-oriented perspectives. Three distinct pathways emerged: participation and motivation beliefs transformed rapidly through peer validation; effort and strategy beliefs shifted moderately through guided experimentation; failure and ability beliefs changed gradually through accumulated evidence. These sequential transformations enabled behavioral agency, cognitive agency, and identity agency. Students developed interdependent agency—aligning autonomous action with collectivist values. Findings demonstrate that mindset transformation requires differentiated support mechanisms and realistic timeframes. Educators should employ targeted interventions; behavioral changes emerge within weeks, while identity transformation requires sustained practice over months.

Article Details

How to Cite
Thayati, S., Chusanachoti, R., & Sawekngam, W. (2026). From Feeling Incapable to Becoming Agentic: Language Mindset Transformation Through Reflective Dialogue in a Thai EFL Classroom. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 19(2), 726–751. https://doi.org/10.70730/UVHA5971
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Sitah Thayati, Curriculum and Instruction Department, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

A lecturer in the Curriculum and Instruction Department at Chiang Mai Rajabhat University in Chiang Mai, Thailand. She completed her PhD in Curriculum and Instruction at the Faculty of Education at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok, Thailand. Her research interests include language curriculum and instruction development, technology-enhanced language learning and language learner agency.

Ruedeerath Chusanachoti, Curriculum and Instruction Department, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

An Assistant Professor in the Division of Foreign Language Teaching, Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. Her research interests include language curriculum and instruction development, speaking and oral communication instruction, out-of-class and autonomous learning, and multimedia and technology for language instruction.

Wichai Sawekngam, Curriculum and Instruction Department, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

An Assistant Professor at the Division of Curriculum and Instruction, Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. His research interests include curriculum development, instructional quality improvement, and teacher development.

References

Amalia, S. N., Nurisma, R. A., Widiati, U., & Prihandoko, L. A. (2023). Learners’ agency, beliefs, mindsets and teacher autonomy as predictors of willingness to communicate in online learning. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27107a3

Aronson, E. (1999). The power of self-persuasion. American Psychologist, 54(11), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088188

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House Digital, Inc.

Gao, Y., & Riley, M. (2010). Knowledge and identity: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00265.x

Jang, J. (2022). An exploratory study on learner agency and second language writing practices of Korean high school students. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(31). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00158-1

Lamy, M.-N., & Goodfellow, R. (1999). Reflective conversation in the virtual language classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 2(2), 43-66. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/25042

Larsen–Freeman, D. (2019). On language learner agency: A complex dynamic systems theory perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 103(51), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12536

Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2017). Measuring language mindsets and modeling their relations with goal orientations and emotional and behavioral responses in failure situations. The Modern Language Journal, 101(1), 214–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12380

Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2019). Language mindsets, meaning-making, and motivation. In M. Lamb, K. Csizér, A. Henry, & S. Ryan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 537–559). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28380- 3_26

Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.

Matyakhan, T., Chusanachoti, R., & Santos, J. A. L. (2024). “I think I speak without hesitation”: Learning-Oriented Assessment to Enhance English Oral Communication of Thai Pre-Service Teachers. REFLections, 31(3), 966–989. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v31i3.275912

Mercer, S. (2011). Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39(4), 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.001

Mercer, S. (2012). The complexity of learner agency. Apples: Journal of Applied Language Studies, 6(2), 41–59.

https://apples.journal.fi/article/view/97838/55851

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.

Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and

systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291

Noriey, I. M., & Javanmiri, M. S. (2025). Dialogic teaching: Boosting learner agency in English language teaching classrooms. Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(1), 574–589. https://doi.org/10.14500/kujhss.v8n1y2025.pp574-589

Oruç, E. (2025). Language mindsets: A systematic review. European Journal of Education, 60(2), e70124. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70124

Oxford, R., Lavine, R. Z., & Amerstorfer, C. M. (2018). Understanding language learning strategies in context: An innovative complexity- based approach. In R. Oxford & C. M. Amerstorfer (Eds.), Language learning strategies and individual learner characteristics: Situating strategy use in diverse contexts (pp. 5–29). Bloomsbury.

Palfreyman, D. (2003). Introduction: Culture and learner autonomy. In D. S. Palfreyman, R.C. (Ed.), Learner autonomy across cultures. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504684_1

Phithakmethakun, M., & Chinokul, S. (2020). Autonomy-supportive English language instruction: An experimental study on students’ motivation in English language classrooms. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 13(1), 94–106. https://so04.tci- thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/237831

Prompan, J., & Piamsai, C. (2024). The effects of peer feedback and self- regulated learning on Thai EFL students’ writing ability and self- regulation. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 100–132. https://so04.tcithaijo.org/ index.php/LEARN/article/view/270378

Ross, L., & Anderson, C. A. (1982). Shortcomings in the attribution process: On the origins and maintenance of erroneous social assessments. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 129–152). Cambridge University Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1985). Peer models: Influence on children’s self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.77.3.313

Suratin, N., & Sribayak, V. (2025). Factors contributing to speaking anxiety and anxiety reduction techniques in Thai adult EFL learners. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 18(1), 294–319. https://doi.org/10.70730/MYTS3987

Thayati, S., Chusanachoti, R., & Sawekngam, W. (2024). Exploring Thai undergraduate students’ language mindsets: A survey analysis. Journal of Studies in the English Language, 19(1), 25–58. https://doi.org/10.64731/jsel.v19i1.271913

The Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(51), 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301

Walsh, M., Matsumura, L. C., Zook-Howell, D., Correnti, R., & Bickel, D. D. (2020). Video-based literacy coaching to develop teachers’ professional vision for dialogic classroom text discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103001

Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? American Psychologist, 75(9), 1269–1284. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000794