Teaching and Learning Development of English for Social Administration

Main Article Content

Warangkana Pongsatornpipat
Sukhuma Aroonjit

Abstract

To redesign English for Social Administration, a branch of ESP aiming to prepare pre-service social work students for their future profession, the present study investigated the opinions of 248 Thai pre-service social work students who had experienced the course and a field internship. Data collected from the survey questionnaire and focus group discussions revealed what was needed, and the key necessity is the ability to use a specialized language register aligned with social work practice in Thailand. In terms of the students’ wants, the findings revealed their learning preferences specifically for tasks that are in line with what professional social workers do in different areas or stages of social work practice in Thailand. Additionally, they highlighted a lack of knowledge of the language used in the target situation. The study suggested that the syllabus should be redesigned based on the stages of social work practice in Thailand and its subfields, such as medical or correctional social work, in order to provide more specific vocabulary or grammatical structures and engaging tasks that stimulate professional social workers’ tasks. More importantly, it is suggested that other stakeholders, including in-service social workers, are encouraged to work collaboratively in designing the course and materials to ensure that the content is completely valid in the social work community and meets their professional needs.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pongsatornpipat, W., & Aroonjit, S. (2026). Teaching and Learning Development of English for Social Administration. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 19(2), 752–773. https://doi.org/10.70730/WKWQ8018
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Warangkana Pongsatornpipat, Language Institute, Thammasat University, Thailand

An English lecturer at Language Institute, Thammasat University, Lampang campus. Her research interests are English for Academic Purposes (EAP), English for Specific Purposes (ESP), and SLA.

Sukhuma Aroonjit, Faculty of Social Administration, Thammasat University, Thailand

An associate professor at the Faculty of Social Administration, Thammasat University. Her research interests include social work theory and practice, medical social work, social development, the context of social problems, and self-direct learning.

References

Anthony, L. (2018). Introducing English for Specific Purposes. Routledge.

Aroonjit, S. (2022). Sat prayuk nai ngan sangkhom songkhro. [Applied sciences in social work]. Thammasat University Press.

Basturkmen, H. (2006). Ideas and options in English for specific purposes. Routledge.

Basturkmen, H. (2025). Core concepts in English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.

Breen, M. (1987). Learner contributions to task design. In C. N. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks. (pp. 23-46). Prentice Hall.

Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to

program development. Heinle & Heinle.

Brown, J. D. (2016). Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. Routledge.

Cheng, A. (2006). Analyzing and enacting academic criticism: The case of an L2 graduate learner of academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(4), 279-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.002

Dominelli, L. (2010). Social work in a globalizing world. Polity Press.

Dorathy, A., & Mahalakshmi, S. N. (2016). Task-based language teaching – A powerful approach for maximizing learning and teaching in L2 acquisition. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(7), 1822–1832.

El Arbaoui, F. Z. (2024). Implementing task-based approach in ESP education: Business schools as a case study. Acuity: Journal of English Language Pedagogy, Literature and Culture, 9(2), 252–266.

Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Routledge.

Hyland, K. (2022). English for specific purposes: What is it and where is it taking us? ESP Today, 10(2), 202–220.

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.

International Federation of Social Workers. (2014). Global definition of social work. https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/

Johns, A. M., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1991). English for specific purposes: International scope, specific in purpose. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 297-314.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.

Lei, M., & Medwell, J. (2022). The changing role of Chinese English-as-foreign-language teachers in the context of curriculum reform: Teachers’ understanding of their new role. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904071

Long, M. H. (2018). Needs analysis. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0860.pub2

Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. Routledge.

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. (1990). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Thailand Social Work Professions Council. (2021). Mattra than kan hai borikan khong phu prakob wichachip sangkhom song khro. [Standards for the social work profession]. Thailand Social Work Professions Council.

Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Longman.