A Comparative Move Analysis of Principals’ Messages of Independent Schools in the UK and British International School in Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study compares the moves and passive voice found in principals' messages from British international schools in Thailand and independent schools in the UK. The increasing trend of Thai students studying abroad and the importance of principals' messages in school marketing provide the background of parent decision making. The objectives were to compare the moves in the promotional genre and the passive voice used in these messages. A corpus of 64 principals' messages (32 from each country) was analyzed for rhetorical moves and passive voice. The findings indicated that while both types of schools generally adhere to standard promotional genre norms, fine differences in linguistic features can be seen, particularly in the use of passive voice, and in the specific emphasis of their persuasive appeals. British international schools in Thailand used passive voice more extensively, especially in relaying information on curriculum and standards, allegedly to formalize their offer and emphasize their British heritage. Thai schools emphasized international recognition and UK quality, whereas UK schools highlighted tradition and cultural values. The study provides insight into the rhetorical climate of education marketing across markets and cultures.
Article Details
References
Amnuai, W., & Wannaruk, A. (2013). Investigating move structure of
English applied linguistics research article discussions published in international and Thai journals. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n2p1
Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections
of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of
English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134–144.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004
Bhatia, V. K. (2013). Critical genre analysis: Investigating interdiscursive performance
in professional practice. Routledge.
Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. A. (2007). Discourse on the move: Using
corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. John Benjamins.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999).
Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson Education.
Cortes, V. (2013). "The purpose of this study is to": Connecting lexical
bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English
for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.002
Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S. (2015). Furthering and applying
move/step constructs: Technology-driven marshalling of Swalesian
genre theory for EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic
Purposes, 19, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.004
Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S. (2017). A move/step model for methods
sections: Demonstrating rigour and credibility. English for Specific
Purposes, 46, 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.01.001
Djuwari, D., & Prestoza, M. J. (2024). Analysis of research articles using
passive voice in the conclusion sections. AJELP: Asian Journal of
English Language and Pedagogy, 12(2), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol12.2.3.2024
ElMalik, A. T., & Nesi, H. (2008). Publishing research in a second language:
The case of Sudanese contributors to international medical journals.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.007
Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for
action (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of
public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133–168.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002
Fauziah, H., & Bashtomi, Y. (2024). “Expunge virtually all use of the passive
voice”: How does style guideline affect passive voice occurrences in
research articles?. Journal of Language and Education, 10(2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2024.14403
Flowerdew, J. (2002). Genre in the classroom: A linguistic approach. In A. M.
Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 91–102).
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers
College Press.
Geertz, C. (1980). Negara: The theatre state in nineteenth-century Bali. Princeton
University Press.
Grissom, J. A., Egalite, A. J., & Lindsay, C. A. (2013). The role of school
principals in school turnaround: A review of the literature. The Wallace
Foundation.
Hardjanto, T. D., & Roselani, N. G. A. (2022). Objectifying science:
Impersonalization in English research articles from different
disciplines. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(10), 2072–2083.
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1210.14
Hyland, K. (2012). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing.
University of Michigan Press.
Kanoksilapatham, W. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research
articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269–292.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
Lertjanyakit, H. (2019). The forecast of international education in
Thailand. Apheit International Journal, 8(1), 22–36.
https://apheit.bu.ac.th/index.php?id=197
Loi, C. K., & Evans, M. S. (2010). Cultural differences in the organization of
research article introductions from the field of educational
psychology: English and Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2814–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.010
Lubis, M. Y. A., Miranti, R., & Lubis, Y. (2024). Passive voice and active voice
in sentence structure. Journal of Psychology, Counseling and Education, 2(1),
–64. https://psycoeducation.my.id/index.php/i/article/view/20
Moreno, A. I. (1998). The explicit signalling of premise-conclusion
sequences in research articles: A contrastive framework. Text, 18(4),
–585.
Paltridge, B. (1994). Genre analysis and identification of textual boundaries.
Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 288–299.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.3.288
Parkinson, J. (2011). The Discussion section as argument: The language
used to prove knowledge claims. English for Specific Purposes,
(3), 164–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.001
Pho, P. D. (2008). Research Article Abstracts in Applied Linguistics and
Educational Technology: A Study of Linguitic Realizations of
Rhetorical Structure and Authorial Stance. Discourse Studies, 10,
–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607087010
Rally. (2024). What are parents searching for on school websites?
https://www.rallyonline.co/blog/what-are-parents-searching-for-
on-school-websites
Smith, L., & Riley, D. (2012). School leadership in times of crisis. School
Leadership & Management, 32(1), 57–71.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.614941
Starratt, R. J. (2004). Ethical leadership. Jossey-Bass.
Stevenson-Jacobson, R., Jacobson, J., & Hilton, A. (2006). Principals'
perceptions of critical skills needed for administration of special
education. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 19(2), 39–47.
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ804089
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings.
Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge
University Press.
Tarry, E. F. (2008). Thai students and their reasons for choosing to study in United
Kingdom universities [Doctoral dissertation, University of Bath].
University of Bath’s Research Portal.
https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/thai-students-
and-their-reasons-for-choosing-to-study-in-united-k/
Teo, P., & Ren, S. (2019). Marketization of universities in China: A critical
discourse analysis of the university president's message. Discourse &
Communication, 13(5), 539–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481319856203
Yakhontova, T. (2006). Cultural and disciplinary variation in academic
discourse: The issue of influencing factors. Journal of English for
academic purposes, 5(2), 153-167.