Perception of EFL Learners towards Technology-mediated Teacher Feedback
Main Article Content
Abstract
Research reveals that technology-mediated teacher feedback can enhance feedback quality, motivate digital natives, and minimize dissatisfaction (Mao & Crosthwaite, 2019). Making use of digital intervention, this study intends to enhance feedback quality provided in composition writing to motivate students and to engage them more effectively with feedback. The aim of the study is to present students’ perception regarding feedback given, using two different digital tools (i.e., Google Docs & Screencastify) on the composition tasks of 94 undergraduate students from a private university in Bangladesh. A mixed-methods case study approach was adopted to analyze data received from two survey questions and interviews after receiving feedback from teachers on students’ composition writing using the digital tools. The study results show a positive perception of students towards technology-mediated teacher feedback. It also presents the reasons for students’ positive perception. Hopefully, the study will contribute to the empirical research literature on feedback literacy in writing.
Article Details
References
Afroze, S. (2023, November 09). How effective is online education in the current Political situation? The Daily Star.
Aull L. (2020). Student-centered assessment and online writing feedback: Technology in a time of crisis. Assessing writing, 46.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100483
Bakla, A. (2020). A mixed-methods study of feedback modes in EFL writing. Language Learning and Technology, 24 (1), 107–128.
Bush, J. C. (2021). Using screencasting to give feedback for academic writing.
Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(5), 473–486.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1840571
Chowdhury, A. (2024, May 05). Educational institutions during heatwave. The
Financial Express. https://thefinancialexpress.com.bd/education/educational-institutions-during-heatwave
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods
research, (3rd ed.). Sage.
Cunningham, K. J. (2019). Student perceptions and use of technology
mediated text and screencast feedback in ESL writing. Computers and
Composition, 52, 222–241.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.02.003
Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Ryan, T., Mahoney, P., Boud, D., Phillips, M.,
& Molloy, E. (2023). Technology and feedback design. In J. M. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning,
design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice,
and policy (pp. 695–739). Springer International Publishing.
East West University (2026, January). Annual report 2025. https://www.ewubd.edu/storage/app/media/Annual%20Report/Annual%20Report%202025.pdf
Han, J., & Li, M. (2024). Exploring ChatGPT-supported teacher feedback in
the EFL context. System, 126, 103502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103502
Haque, M. T. (2026). The history and contemporary reality of learning
English in Bangladesh. English Language Teaching, 19(3).
Hidayat, F. (2020). Exploring students’ view of using Google Docs in
writing class. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(2), 184–194.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language
acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second
language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
Mao, S. S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Investigating written corrective
feedback:(Mis) alignment of teachers’ beliefs and practice. Journal of
Second Language Writing, 45, 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.05.004
Nasri, N. F., Habali, A. H. M., & Adam, M. H. M. (2022). Google Docs:
students’ perceptions as online collaborative tool in learning writing
skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and
Development, 11(3), 690-705.
Newton, P., and Miah, M. (2017). Evidence-based higher education – is the
learning styles ‘Myth’ important? Front. Psychol, 8, 444.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00444
Peungcharoenkun, T. & Waluyo, B., (2024). ‘Writing pedagogy in higher
education: The efficacy of mediating feedback with technology’,
Reading & Writing 15(1), a487.
https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v15i1.487
Phisutthangkoon, K. (2025). Thai EFL teachersʼ and studentsʼ beliefs about
oral corrective feedback. PASAA Journal, 71, 84‒120.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part II: Do they really
think differently? On the horizon, 9(6), 1–6.
Puentedura, R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education. Hippasus.
http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/
Rahman, M. N., Chowdhury, S., & McCray, D. (2024). Undergraduate
students’ voices on the role of tutorial-based dialogic feedback in developing academic writing skills. Feedback Research in Second Language, 2, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.32038/frsl.2024.02.01
Schmidt, R, W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language
learning, Applied Linguistics,11(2), 129–158.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
Savaşçı, M., & Akçor, G. (2023). Multimodal technology-mediated feedback
In second language writing classes through screencasting. In New
directions in technology for writing instruction (pp. 107–122).
Springer International Publishing.
Tahmina, K., & Podder, R. (2023). Different types of feedback to develop
English writing skills of tertiary students in Bangladesh. Bangladesh
Teacher Education Journal (BTEJ), 3, 96-105.
Uddin, M. M., & Bailey, R. P. (2024). Students’ perception of the effects of
integrating EdTech in teaching English poetry in higher education in
Bangladesh. The International Journal of Learning in Higher Education,
(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7955/CGP/v31i02/33-55
University Grants Commission. (2022, February 27). Policy of blended
Learning For Bangladesh. https://ugc.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/ugc.portal.gov.bd/poliies/ddeb0952_f123_4d24_8ddf_53b9b24031f8/2022-06-06-06-44A6a5dea173d2d0ec327b83f57cd55e24.pdf
Wood, J. (2021). A dialogic technology-mediated model of feedback uptake
and literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(8),
–1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1852174
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2023). Effects of technology enhanced peer, teacher and self-feedback on students’ collaborative writing, critical thinking tendency and engagement in learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35(1), 166-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09337-y