Perception of EFL Learners towards Technology-mediated Teacher Feedback

Main Article Content

Saifa Haque
Shamima Akter Shanta
Syeda Shabnam Mahmud

Abstract

Research reveals that technology-mediated teacher feedback can enhance feedback quality, motivate digital natives, and minimize dissatisfaction (Mao & Crosthwaite, 2019). Making use of digital intervention, this study intends to enhance feedback quality provided in composition writing to motivate students and to engage them more effectively with feedback. The aim of the study is to present students’ perception regarding feedback given, using two different digital tools (i.e., Google Docs & Screencastify) on the composition tasks of 94 undergraduate students from a private university in Bangladesh. A mixed-methods case study approach was adopted to analyze data received from two survey questions and interviews after receiving feedback from teachers on students’ composition writing using the digital tools. The study results show a positive perception of students towards technology-mediated teacher feedback. It also presents the reasons for students’ positive perception. Hopefully, the study will contribute to the empirical research literature on feedback literacy in writing.

Article Details

How to Cite
Haque, S., Shanta , S. A., & Mahmud, S. S. (2026). Perception of EFL Learners towards Technology-mediated Teacher Feedback. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 19(2), 1251–1270. https://doi.org/10.70730/FLME2108
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Saifa Haque, Department of English, School of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, East West University, Bangladesh

A senior lecturer at the Department of English, East West University. She was a Hornby scholar at the University of Warwick, UK. Her research interest revolves around the use of technology in teaching, teacher training, and assessment.

Shamima Akter Shanta , Department of English, School of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, East West University, Bangladesh

A senior lecturer at the Department of English, East West University. She is a recipient of the Australia Awards Scholarship from Bangladesh. Her research interests involve contextual material development, the use of ICT in teaching and learning English, pedagogical culture, and the professional development of teachers.

Syeda Shabnam Mahmud, Department of English, School of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, East West University, Bangladesh

A senior lecturer in the Department of English at East West University, Bangladesh. Her research interest revolves around the use of technology for language teaching, teaching writing, material development, etc. She has published a few papers in international peer-reviewed journals.

References

Afroze, S. (2023, November 09). How effective is online education in the current Political situation? The Daily Star.

https://www.thedailystar.net/lifeliving/news/how-effective-online-education-the-current-political-situation-3465606

Aull L. (2020). Student-centered assessment and online writing feedback: Technology in a time of crisis. Assessing writing, 46.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100483

Bakla, A. (2020). A mixed-methods study of feedback modes in EFL writing. Language Learning and Technology, 24 (1), 107–128.

Bush, J. C. (2021). Using screencasting to give feedback for academic writing.

Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(5), 473–486.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1840571

Chowdhury, A. (2024, May 05). Educational institutions during heatwave. The

Financial Express. https://thefinancialexpress.com.bd/education/educational-institutions-during-heatwave

Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods

research, (3rd ed.). Sage.

Cunningham, K. J. (2019). Student perceptions and use of technology

mediated text and screencast feedback in ESL writing. Computers and

Composition, 52, 222–241.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.02.003

Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Ryan, T., Mahoney, P., Boud, D., Phillips, M.,

& Molloy, E. (2023). Technology and feedback design. In J. M. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning,

design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice,

and policy (pp. 695–739). Springer International Publishing.

East West University (2026, January). Annual report 2025. https://www.ewubd.edu/storage/app/media/Annual%20Report/Annual%20Report%202025.pdf

Han, J., & Li, M. (2024). Exploring ChatGPT-supported teacher feedback in

the EFL context. System, 126, 103502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103502

Haque, M. T. (2026). The history and contemporary reality of learning

English in Bangladesh. English Language Teaching, 19(3).

Hidayat, F. (2020). Exploring students’ view of using Google Docs in

writing class. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(2), 184–194.

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language

acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second

language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.

Mao, S. S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Investigating written corrective

feedback:(Mis) alignment of teachers’ beliefs and practice. Journal of

Second Language Writing, 45, 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.05.004

Nasri, N. F., Habali, A. H. M., & Adam, M. H. M. (2022). Google Docs:

students’ perceptions as online collaborative tool in learning writing

skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and

Development, 11(3), 690-705.

Newton, P., and Miah, M. (2017). Evidence-based higher education – is the

learning styles ‘Myth’ important? Front. Psychol, 8, 444.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00444

Peungcharoenkun, T. & Waluyo, B., (2024). ‘Writing pedagogy in higher

education: The efficacy of mediating feedback with technology’,

Reading & Writing 15(1), a487.

https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v15i1.487

Phisutthangkoon, K. (2025). Thai EFL teachersʼ and studentsʼ beliefs about

oral corrective feedback. PASAA Journal, 71, 84‒120.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part II: Do they really

think differently? On the horizon, 9(6), 1–6.

Puentedura, R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education. Hippasus.

http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/

Rahman, M. N., Chowdhury, S., & McCray, D. (2024). Undergraduate

students’ voices on the role of tutorial-based dialogic feedback in developing academic writing skills. Feedback Research in Second Language, 2, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.32038/frsl.2024.02.01

Schmidt, R, W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language

learning, Applied Linguistics,11(2), 129–158.

https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129

Savaşçı, M., & Akçor, G. (2023). Multimodal technology-mediated feedback

In second language writing classes through screencasting. In New

directions in technology for writing instruction (pp. 107–122).

Springer International Publishing.

Tahmina, K., & Podder, R. (2023). Different types of feedback to develop

English writing skills of tertiary students in Bangladesh. Bangladesh

Teacher Education Journal (BTEJ), 3, 96-105.

Uddin, M. M., & Bailey, R. P. (2024). Students’ perception of the effects of

integrating EdTech in teaching English poetry in higher education in

Bangladesh. The International Journal of Learning in Higher Education,

(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7955/CGP/v31i02/33-55

University Grants Commission. (2022, February 27). Policy of blended

Learning For Bangladesh. https://ugc.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/ugc.portal.gov.bd/poliies/ddeb0952_f123_4d24_8ddf_53b9b24031f8/2022-06-06-06-44A6a5dea173d2d0ec327b83f57cd55e24.pdf

Wood, J. (2021). A dialogic technology-mediated model of feedback uptake

and literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(8),

–1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1852174

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.

Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2023). Effects of technology enhanced peer, teacher and self-feedback on students’ collaborative writing, critical thinking tendency and engagement in learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35(1), 166-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09337-y