Economic feasibility of LNG fuel for trans ocean-going ships: A case study of container ships

Authors

  • Yifan Wang Faculty of Creative Industries, Architecture and Engineering, Solent University, East Park Terrace, Southampton, SO14 0YN, UK
  • Laurie Wright Faculty of Creative Industries, Architecture and Engineering, Solent University, East Park Terrace, Southampton, SO14 0YN, UK
  • Pengfei Zhang Faculty of Business, Law and Digital Technology, Solent University East Park Terrace, Southampton, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2021.248055

Keywords:

Liquefied natural gas (LNG), Air emissions, Container ships, Marine pollution, Economic feasibility

Abstract

The challenges and risks brought by the new 2020 sulfur cap are undeniable. Since the idea of using Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) as a marine fuel for ocean-going ships has become more attractive to the industry, in this study, a lifetime-based cost evaluation framework is proposed to systematically evaluate the implementation of using LNG as fuel for general ocean-going commercial ships. This approach can be represented as a quantitative decision-supporting process with a combination of very different features of the economic aspect in one coherent framework. The benefits of the approach are discussed through a case study, and the economic performance of the 3 varying sizes of ocean-going LNG-fueled container ships are tested. The case study results indicate that, considering the differences in the life cycle cost (LCC) and cash flow performances between LNG-fueled ships and conventional oil-fueled ones, the acquisition premium for ocean-going LNG-fueled container ships is sufficient to warrant the saving in terms of the LCC. However, the LNG price differences in the different regions could lead to noticeable differences in LCC results. This study’s analysis fills gaps identified in the existing research about the benefits and disadvantages of using LNG as fuel for general ocean-going commercial ships. Finally, the study reveals an underlying novelty of the proposed framework to provide reliable decision supporting in investment by expanding the short-term perspective to a lifetime one.

References

Acciaro, M. (2014). Real option analysis for environmental compliance: LNG and emission control areas. Transportation Research Part D, 28, 41-50. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.007

Algell, J. A., Bakosch, A., & Forsman, B. (2012). Feasibility study on LNG fuelled short sea and coastal shipping in the wider Caribbean region. Retrieved from http://www.imo.org/en/ OurWork/Environment/PollutionPrevention/AirPollution/Documents/Air%20pollution/Feasibility%20Study%20on%20LNG.pdf

American Petroleum Institute (API). (2015). Liquefied natural gas operations consistent methodology for estimating greenhouse gas emissions. American Petroleum Institute.

Banawan, A. A., Ei-gohary, M. M., & Sasadek, I. S. (2009). Environmental and economical benefits of changing from marine diesel oil to natural-gas fuel for short-voyage high power passenger ships. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 224(2), 103-113. doi:10.1243/14750902JEME181

Baresic, D., Smith, T., Raucci, C. Rehmatulla, N., Narula, K., & Rojon, I. (2018). LNG as a marine fuel in the EU: Market, bunkering infrastructure investments and risks in the context of GHG reductions. Retrieved from https://u-mas.co.uk/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=yVGOF-ct68s%3D&portalid=0

Burel, F., Rodolfo, T., & Nicola, Z. (2013). Improving sustainability of maritime transport through utilization of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) for propulsion. Energy, 57(1), 412-420. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.002

Cariou, P., Cheaitou, A., Faury, O., & Hamdan. S. (2019). The feasibility of Arctic container shipping: the economic and environmental impacts of ice thickness. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2019. doi:10.1057/s41278-019-00145-3

Cheenkachorn, K., Poompipatpong, C., & Gyeung-ho, C. (2013). Performance and emissions of a heavy-duty diesel engine fuelled with diesel and LNG (liquid natural gas). Energy, 53, 52-57. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.02.027

Chryssakis, C., Balland, O., Tvete, H.A., & Brandsæter, A. (2014). DNV GL strategic research & innovation position paper 1-2014, Alternative Fuels for Shipping. Retrieved from https://www.zerovisiontool.com/sites/www.zerovisiontool.com/files/attachments/si_michele_acciaro.pdf

Clauseni, N. B. (2012). Costs and benefits of LNG as ship fuel for container vessels. Retrieved from https://marine.mandieselturbo.com/docs/librariesprovider6/technical-papers/costs-and-benefits-of-lng.pdf?sfvrsn=18

Danish Maritime Authority (DMA). (2012). North European LNG Infrastructure Project: Feasibility study for an LNG filling station infrastructure and test of recommendations. Retrieved from http://www.lngbunkering.org/sites/default/files/2012%20DMA%20North% 20European%20LNG%20Infrastructure%20Project_0.pdf

DNV-GL. (2011). Greener shipping in North America. DNV-GL.

DNV-GL. (2015). LNG as fuel report. Retrieved from https://www.dnvgl.com/Images/ LNG_report_2015-01_web_tcm8-13833.pdf

DNV-GL. (2019). Current price development oil and gas. Retrieved from https://www.dnvgl.com/ maritime/lng/current-price-development-oil-and-gas.html

Faber, J., Nelissen, D., Ahdour, S., Harmsen, J., Toma, S., & Lebesque, L. (2015). Study on the completion of an EU framework on LNG-fuelled ships and its relevant fuel provision infrastructure. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/2015-12-lng-lot3.pdf

IMO. (2016). International convention for the prevention of pollution from ships. Retrieved from http://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/ListOfConventions/Pages/International-Convention-for-the-Prevention-of-Pollution-from-Ships-(MARPOL).aspx

Lee, H. J., Yoo, S. H., & Huh, S. Y. (2020). Economic benefits of introducing LNG-fuelled ships for imported flour in South Korea. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 78, 102220. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2019.102220

Li, J., Wu, B., & Mao, G. (2015). Research on the performance and emission characteristics of the LNG diesel marine engine. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 27(2), 945-954. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2015.09.036

Lindstand, H., Steen, S., & Sandass, I. (2014). Assessment of profit, cost, and emissions for slender bulk vessel designs. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 29, 32-39. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2014.04.001

Notteboom, T. (2010). The impact of low sulphur fuel requirements in shipping on the competitiveness of roro shipping in Northern Europe. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 10(1), 63-95. doi:10.1007/s13437-010-0001-7

Okano, K. (2001). Life cycle costing - An approach to life cycle cost management: A consideration from historical development. Asia Pacifìc Management Review, 6(3), 317-341. doi:10.6126/APMR

Onyemech, C. (2016). Espousing liquefied natural gas as marine propulsion fuel: Prospects and challenges. International Journal of Advancements in Technology, 7(3), 1000160. doi:10.4172/0976-4860.1000160

Schinas, O., & Butler, M. (2016). Feasibility and commercial considerations of LNG-fueled ships. Ocean Engineering, 122, 84-96. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.04.031

Schinas, O., & Stefankos, C. N. (2013). The cost of SOx limits to marine operators: Results from exploring marine fuel prices. International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 7(2), 125-131. doi:10.12716/1001.07.02.15

Stenersen, D., & Thonstand, O. (2017). GHG and NOx emissions from gas fuelled engines. Trondheim: SINTEF.

Tan, R., Duru, O., & Thepsithar, P. (2020). Assessment of relative fuel cost for dual fuel marine engines along major Asian container shipping routes. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 140, 102004. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.102004

Thomson, H., Corbett, J. J., & Winebrake, J. J. (2015). Natural gas as a marine fuel. Energy Policy, 87, 153-167. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.027

Verbeek, R. P., Kadijk, G., van Mensch, P., Wulffers, C. A., van den Beemt, C. B. P. J., & Fraga, F. S. (2011). Environmental and Economic aspects of using LNG as a fuel for shipping in the Netherland. Wageningen: TNO.

Wärtsilä. (2015). The dual fuel technology. Retrieved from https://www.onthemosway.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/5.pdf

Wik, C., & Niemi, S. (2016). Low emission engine technologies for future tier 3 legislations: Options and case studies. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 1(3), 1-22. doi:10.1186/s41072-016-0009-z

Wu, Y. H., Hua, J., & Chen, H. L. (2018). Economic feasibility of an alternative fuel for sustainable short sea shipping: Case of cross-Taiwan strait transport. In Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on New Technologies. Madrid, Spain. doi:10.11159/icepr18.181

Xu, H., & Yang, D. (2020). LNG-fuelled container ship sailing on the Arctic Sea: Economic and emission assessment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 87, 102556. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102556

Yegorov, Y. (2009). Socio-economic influences of population density. Chinese Business Review, 8(7), 1-12.

Yoo, S. I. (2019). Global status and outlook of LNG fuelled ship & LNG bunkering. Retrieved from http://www.mof.go.kr/jfile/readDownloadFile.do?fileId=MOF_ARTICLE_28194&fileSeq=2

Downloads

Published

2021-02-12

How to Cite

Wang, Y., Wright, L. ., & Zhang, P. (2021). Economic feasibility of LNG fuel for trans ocean-going ships: A case study of container ships. Maritime Technology and Research, 3(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2021.248055