Perceptions of coastal villagers on the non-market goods and services of mangroves in Cagayan province, Philippines

Authors

  • Emma Legaspi Ballad DA-Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Regional Office No. 02, Tuguegarao City, Cagayan, Philippines
  • Cecilia Balagtas Mangabat Isabela State University Cabagan Campus, Cabagan, Isabela, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2021.248619

Keywords:

Mangrove, Non-market goods and services, Perceptions, Coastal villagers, Cagayan province

Abstract

Household survey interviews were conducted to randomly selected 280 respondents in order to understand the socio-economic profile and livelihood structures of coastal villagers, as well as to evaluate the extent of their knowledge of, awareness of, and participation in mangrove rehabilitation projects in Cagayan Province, Philippines. The perceptions of the respondents of the non-market goods and services (i.e., the indirect and non-use values) of mangroves were evaluated through the use of proxy attitudinal statements. The results showed that the majority of the respondents were fishers, which confirmed that the households depended largely on coastal resources for their livelihoods. The respondents were from low-income households, with most of them below the poverty threshold level for the province. Despite this, the respondents displayed high levels of awareness and knowledge of mangroves in the area. The results further showed that the respondents recognized the value of protecting and preserving the mangrove ecosystem; however, there was an exposition of disagreement for statements that contained the phrases “pay”, “cost”, or “money”. This result inferred that respondents were reasonably sensitive with regards to conservation when it involves monetary payment, given their socio-economic conditions. Nevertheless, the possibility that contributions could be in-kind could be explored for further studies. The information generated from this study is an input to future valuation researches in the area.

References

Bann, C. (1999). A contingent valuation of the mangroves of Benut, Johor State, Malaysia (p. 78). Johor State Forestry Department/DANCED/Darudec: Preparation of an Integrated Management Plan for the Sustainable Use of the Johor Mangrove Forest, Malaysia.

Baptiste-Marre, J., Brander, L., Thebaud, O., Boncoeur, J., Pascoe, S., Coglan, L., & Pascal, N. (2015). Non-market use and non-use values for preserving ecosystem services over time: A choice experiment application to coral reef ecosystems in New Caledonia. Ocean & Coastal Management, 105, 1-14. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.12.010

Becker, N., & Choresh, Y. (2006). Economic aspect of marine protected areas (MPAs) (p. 131). UNEP MAP RAC/SPA, Tunis.

Carandang, A. P., Camacho, L. D., Gevaña, D. T., Dizon, J. T., Camacho, S. C., de Luna, C. C., Pulhin, F. B., Combalicer, E. A., Paras, F. D., Peras, R. J., & Rebugio, L. L. (2013). Economic valuation for sustainable mangrove ecosystems management in Bohol and Palawan, Philippines. Forest Science and Technology, 9(3), 118-125. doi:10.1080/21580103.2013.801149

Cochran, W. G. (1963). Sampling techniques (2nd eds.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Cruz-Trinidad, A., Alojado, Z., & Cargamento, A. G. C. (1996). Options for land use management in Lingayen Gulf, Philippines (pp. 64-77). In Cruz-Trinidad, A. (Ed.) Valuation of tropical coastal resources: Theory and application of linear programming. The International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management.

Dinesh, K., Chinchu, E. R., & Geeji, M. T. (2017). Attitude and perception of local inhabitants towards mangrove ecosystems. Journal of Extension Education, 29(4), 5984-5987. doi:10.26725/JEE.2017.4.29.5984-5987

FAO. (2003). Status and trends in mangrove area extent worldwide. In Wilkie, M. L., & Fortuna, S. (Eds.). Forest Resources Assessment Working Paper No. 63. Forest Resources Division, FAO, Rome.

Garcia, K., Gevana, D., & Malabrigo, P. (2014). Philippines’ mangrove ecosystem: Status, threats, and conservation (pp. 81-94). In Ibrahim, F. H., Latiff, A., Hakeem, K. R., & Ozturk, M. (Eds.). Mangrove ecosystems of Asia: Status, challenges and management strategies. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

Giri, C., Ochieng, E., Tieszen, L., Zhu, Z., Singh, A., Loveland, T., Masek, J., & Duke, N. (2011). Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20(1), 154-159. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00584.x

Heal, G. M., Barbier, E. B., Boyle, K. J., Covich, A. P., Gloss, S. P., Hershner, C. H., Hoehn, J. P., Pringle, C. M., Polasky, S., Segerson, K., & Shrader-Frechette, K. (2005). Valuing ecosystem services: Toward better environmental decision-making. National Academies Press.

Kjerfve, B. (1990). Manual for investigation of hydrological processes in mangrove ecosystems (p. 99). UNESCO/UNDP Regional Project (RAS/86/120).

Kolstad, C. D. (2000). Environmental economics (p. 496). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Munji, C. A., Bele, M. Y., Idinoba, M. E., & Sonwa, D. J. (2014). Floods and mangrove forests, friends or foes? Perceptions of relationships and risks in Cameroon coastal mangroves. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 140, 67-75. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2013.11.017

Padilla, J. E., & Jansen, R. (1996). Valuation & evaluation of management alternative for the Pagbilao Mangrove Forest. Collaborative Research in Economics of Environment & Development (CREED), Working Paper Series No. 9.

Primavera, J. H., & Esteban, J. M. A. (2008). A review of mangrove rehabilitation in the Philippines: Successes, failures and future prospects. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 16(5), 345-358. doi:10.1007/s11273-008-9101-y

PSA (Philippine Statistics Authority). (2016). 2015 Philippine poverty statistics. Retrieved from https://psa.gov.ph/poverty-press-releases/data

Sarmin, N. S, Ismail, M. H., Zaki, P. H., Awang, K. W., Rahman, M., & Imran, K. (2018). Community perception on mangrove change issue in Southwest Johor, Malaysia. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(3.7), 171-173. doi:10.14419/ijet.v7i3.7.16265

Downloads

Published

2021-04-29