Analyzing risks in Naval Operations: The case of visit, board, search and seizure operations in the Côte D’Ivoire Navy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2023.258421Keywords:
Risk analysis, Maritime security, Law enforcement, Visit, Board, Search and Seizure (VBSS) operations, NavyAbstract
Visit, Board, Search and Seizure (VBSS) operations, which are the preferred modus operandi to deliver law enforcement at sea, have always been, and remain, a risky endeavor. Because this type of operation holds a pivotal role in maritime law enforcement, safe execution is vital to protect involved staff and assets. Hence, this paper analyzes risks associated with VBSS operations; its main aim is to improve the overall level of safety and bring the identified risks under control, by developing associated mitigation measures. First, the risks under discussion were assessed, based on the professional judgment and experience of the naval personnel involved in these operations. Their inputs were introduced in a conceptual framework and the associated results were scored, compared, and benchmarked. It is true that there is an inherent level of risk built in the execution of VBSS operations; although the occurrence of negative incidents/mishaps can be considered marginal for the vast majority of the time, events like these are most often associated with serious consequences. The results of this research effort acknowledged that risk management practices can be useful and have variable performance in bringing risks to as low as reasonably practicable. In this aspect, risk mitigation can be more effective by implementing a systems approach of physical and administrative barriers with four distinct pillars: “Training”, “Equipment”, “Organizational Culture”, and “Procedures”.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cite this article: Kouakou, D.D.Y., Dalaklis, D., Baumler, R. (2023). Analyzing risks in Naval Operations: The case of visit, board, search and seizure operations in the Côte D’Ivoire Navy. Maritime Technology and Research, 5(1), 258421. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2023.258421
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Highlights
- Research bridges the gap of knowledge in studies on risks in a key naval operations
- Novelty of the conceptual research framework designed by authors which has proven to grasp important aspects of naval operations
- Research addresses performance factors of naval forces securing the Gulf of Guinea region
References
Apostolakis, G. (1990). The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. Science, 250, 1359-1364. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2255906
Aven, T. (2012). The risk concept: Historical and recent development trends. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 99, 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.11.006
Aven, T., & Zio, E. (2014). Foundational issues in risk assessment and risk management. Risk Analysis, 34(7), 1164-1172. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12132
Bennett, B. T. (2018). Understanding, assessing, and responding to terrorism: Protecting critical infrastructure and personnel. John Wiley & Sons.
British Ports Association, UK Maritime Pilots Association, UK Harbour Master’s Association, UK Major Ports Group, Port Skills and Safety (“the Five associations”). (2021). The embarkation and disembarkation of pilots - code of safe practice. Retrieved from https://www.britishports.org.uk/system/files/documents/the_embarkation_disembarkation_of_pilots_code_of_safe_practice_-_2021_review.pdf
Bueger, C. (2015). What is maritime security? Marine Policy, 53, 159-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.12.005
Covello, V. T., & Mumpower, J. (1985). Risk analysis and risk management: An historical perspective. Risk Analysis, 5(2), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00159.x
Cox, J. L. A. (2008a). Some limitations of “Risk= threat×vulnerability×consequence” for risk analysis of terrorist attacks. Risk Analysis, 28(6), 1749-1761. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01142.x
Cox, J. L. A. (2008b). What’s wrong with risk matrices? Risk Analysis, 28(2), 497-512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01030.x
Cox, J. L. A. (2009). What’s wrong with hazard‐ranking systems? An expository note. Risk Analysis, 29(7), 940-948. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01209.x
Cox, J. L. A., Babayev, D., & Huber, W. (2005). Some limitations of qualitative risk rating systems. Risk Analysis, 25(3), 651-662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00615.x
Dalaklis, D. (2012). Piracy in the horn of Africa: Some good news, but a lot of work has still to be done. Maritime Security Review. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281632706_Piracy_in_the_Horn_of_Africa_Some_good_news_but_a_lot_of_work_has_still_to_be_done
Dalaklis, D. (2017a). Improving maritime situational awareness: establishing a maritime safety and security network. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317957117_Improving_Maritime_Situational_Awareness_Establishing_a_Maritime_Safety_and_Security_Network
Dalaklis, D. (2017b). Safety and security in shipping operations (pp. 197-213). Visvikis, I., & Panayides, P. (Eds.). Shipping operations management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62365-8_9
Dalaklis, D. (2019). Technology deployment in maritime security: Emerging issues. In Proceedings of the Global Maritime Security Conference. Abuja, Nigeria. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336459572_TECHNOLOGY_DEPLOYMENT_IN_MARITIME_SECURITY_EMERGING_ISSUES
Del Pozo, F., Dymock, A., Feldt, L., Hebrard, P., & di Monteforte, F. S. (2010). Maritime surveillance in support of CSDP. The Wise Pen Team Final Report to EDA Steering Board, 26. Retrieved from http://www.science-ethique.org/site_ES/fichiers/docs/b_wise_pen_team_report_26_april_2010.pdf
European Union. (2018). Protocol on the implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire (2018-2024). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/?uri=CELEX:22018A0731(01)
Feldt, L. (2016). The complex nature of today’s maritime security issues: A European perspective (pp. 11- 26). In Krause, J., & Bruns, S. (Eds.). Routledge handbook of naval strategy and security (1st ed). Routledge.
Fink, M. D. (2010). The right of visit for warships: Some challenges in applying the law of maritime interdiction on the high seas. Military Law & Law of War Review, 49, 7-46. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/mllwr49&i=7
Goerlandt, F. (2015). Risk analysis in maritime transportation: Principles, frameworks and evaluation (Doctoral dissertation). Aalto University, Finland. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/17569
Goerlandt, F., & Montewka, J. (2015). Maritime transportation risk analysis: Review and analysis in light of some foundational issues. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 138, 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.01.025
Guilfoyle, D. J. A. (2016). Transnational crime (pp. 262- 276). In Warner, R., & Kaye, S. (Eds.). Routledge handbook of maritime regulation and enforcement (1st ed.). Routledge.
Guilfoyle, D. J. A. (2017). Maritime law enforcement operations and intelligence in an age of maritime security. International Law Studies, 93, 298-321. http://stockton.usnwc.edu/ils/vol93/iss1/11
Hermanski, G., & Daley, C. (2010). On formal safety assessment (FSA) procedure. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Claude-Daley/publication/44057113_On_formal_safety_assessment_FSA_procedure/links/02e7e524aa530e6470000000/On-formal-safety-assessment-FSA-procedure.pdf
Hodgkinson, S. L., Cook, E., Fichter, T., & Fleming, C. (2007). Challenges to maritime interception operations in the war on terror: Bridging the gap. American University International Law Review, 22(4), 583-672. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/amuilr22&i=593
Hughes, W. P. (2012). Naval operations: A close Look at the operational level of war at sea. Naval War College Review, 65(3), 22-46. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26397306
International Maritime Organization. (2002). Guidelines for formal safety assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process. MSC/Circ.1023 / MEPC/Circ.392. Retrieved from https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/HumanElement/Documents/1023-MEPC392.pdf
International Maritime Organization. (2005). Protocol of 2005 to the convention for the suppression of unlawful acts against the safety of maritime navigation. LEG/CONF.15/21. International Maritime Organization
International Maritime Organization. (2011). Pilot transfer arrangements. Resolution A.1045(27). Retrieved from https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/AssemblyDocuments/A.1045(27).pdf
International Maritime Pilots’ Association. (N.D.). IMO & pilotage. Retrieved from https://www.impahq.org/imo-pilotage
Ioannides, N. A. (2017). A commentary on the dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Ghana and Côte D’Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte D’Ivoire). Maritime Safety and Security Law Journal, 3, 48-61. https://www.marsafelawjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/MarSafeLaw_Issue3_Ioannides.pdf
Joseph, A., & Dalaklis, D. (2021). The international convention for the safety of life at sea: Highlighting interrelations of measures towards effective risk mitigation. Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping, 5(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.2021.1880766
Judith, A., & Dalaklis, D. (2017). Violence within the maritime domain of the CEMAC region. Maritime Interdiction Operations Journal, 15, 17-27. https://nmiotc.nato.int/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Journal-15-lite.pdf
Kaplan, S. (1997). The words of risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 17(4), 407-417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00881.x
Kaplan, S., & Garrick, B. J. (1981). On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1(1), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x
Klein, N. (2011). Maritime Security and the Law of the Sea. Oxford University Press.
Kontovas, C. A. (2005). Formal safety assessment. National Technical University of Athens, Greece. Retrieved from http://martrans.org/documents/extra/diplomatheses/Kontovas/KONTOVAS%20thesis.pdf
Kontovas, C. A., & Psaraftis, H. N. (2009). Formal safety assessment: A critical review. Marine Technology, 46(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.5957/mtsn.2009.46.1.45
Krause, J., & Bruns, S. (2016). Routledge handbook of naval strategy and security. Routledge.
Merrick, J. R. W., & Van Dorp, J. R. (2001). Modelling risk in the dynamic environment of maritime transportation (pp. 1090-1098). In Proceeding of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2001.977419
Merrick, J. R. W., & Van Dorp, R. (2006). Speaking the truth in maritime risk assessment. Risk Analysis, 26(1), 223-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00708.x
Mieu, B. (2020). Côte D’Ivoire: Seizure of nearly half a ton of cocaine off Abidjan. Jeuneafrique. Retrieved from https://www.jeuneafrique.com/891429/societe/cote-divoire-411-tonnes-de-cocaines-en-provenance-du-bresil-saisies-au-large-dabidjan
NATO. (2005). ATP-71 allied maritime interdiction operations. Retrieved from http://www.navedu.navy.mi.th/stg/databasestory/data/laukniyom/ship-active/big-country-ship/United-States/ATP/ATP_71.pdf
Nordquist, M. H., Rosenne, S., Yankov, A., & Nandan, S. N. (1985). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982. United Nations.
Okafor-Yarwood, I., Pigeon, M., Amling, A., Ridgway, C., Adewumi, J. I. & Joubert, L. (2020). Stable seas: Gulf of Guinea. One Earth Future. http://dx.doi.org/10.18289/OEF.2020.043
Ozbas, B. (2013). Safety risk analysis of maritime transportation: Review of the literature. Transportation Research Record, 2326(1), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.3141%2F2326-05
Papastavridis, E. (2011). The right of visit on the high seas in a theoretical perspective: Mare liberum versus mare clausum revisited. Leiden Journal of International Law, 24(1), 45-69. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156510000580
Republic of Côte D’Ivoire. (2014). Stratégie nationale de l’action de l’état en mer [National Strategy for the State Action at Sea].
Republic of Côte D’Ivoire. (2016a). Loi No 2016-414 du 15 juin 2016 portant organisation de la défense et des forces armées de Côte D’Ivoire [Law setting the organization of the defence and the armed forces of Côte D’Ivoire].
Republic of Côte D’Ivoire. (2016b). Loi No 2016-554 du 26 juillet 2016 relative à la pêche et à l’aquaculture [Law related to fishing and aquaculture].
Republic of Côte D’Ivoire. (2017). Loi No 2017-442 du 30 juin 2017 portant code maritime [Law setting the Maritime Code].
Rosqvist, T., & Tuominen, R. (2004). Qualification of formal safety assessment: An exploratory study. Safety Science, 42(2), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(03)00005-5
Shearer, I. A. (1986). Problems of jurisdiction and law enforcement against delinquent vessels. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 35(2), 320-343. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/35.2.320
Soares, C. G., & Teixeira, A. P. (2001). Risk assessment in maritime transportation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 74(3), 299-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00104-1
Ulusçu, Ö. S., Özbaş, B., Altıok, T., & Or, İ. (2009). Risk analysis of the vessel traffic in the strait of Istanbul. Risk Analysis, 29(10), 1454-1472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01287.x
United Nations. (1982). United Nations convention on the law of the sea (UNCLOS). Retrieved from https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf
United States Coast Guard. (2018). Risk management. Commandant instruction 3500.3A
Wang, J. (2001). The current status and future aspects in formal ship safety assessment. Safety Science, 38(1), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00052-7
Warner, R. (2016). The high seas regime: a model of self-regulation? (pp. 16- 26). In Warner, R., & Kaye, S. (Eds.). Routledge handbook of maritime regulation and enforcement (1st ed). Routledge.
Yoe, C. (2019). Principles of risk analysis: Decision making under uncertainty (2nd ed.). CRC press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Maritime Technology and Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
