From efficiency to resilience: Strategic shifts in maritime organizations through digitalization, ESG, and human capital (2018 - 2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2026.283716Keywords:
Maritime strategy; Resilience; Digital transformation; ESG; Alliances; Human capital; Glocal adaptationAbstract
Most existing maritime research examines digitalization, ESG pressures, and human capital separately. This paper fills the gap in explaining how the three factors dynamically reshape strategic orientations in the highly unstable post-2020 period. It explains how maritime organizations reconfigured their strategies between 2018 and 2025. The research is based on sixteen semi-structured interviews with top professionals from different segments of the maritime ecosystem across Europe and Asia, analyzed according to Gioia methodology. The main finding is a structural transformation from an efficiency strategy before 2020 toward a resilience strategy after 2020. It finds that this shift emanates from an interaction between digitalization (a ‘sensing’ capability) and human capital (a ‘reconfiguring’ capability). Seven strategic patterns are identified, which include new forms such as glocal ESG adaptation- blending global rules with local innovation- and hybrid leadership--blending technical, digital, and human skills- in addition to more traditional forms like asset diversification or trade pattern flexibility through chartering tonnage. This study is original as it is the first integrated empirical analysis of the interaction, with a rare pre/post-2020 temporal comparison conceptualizing new patterns as specific dynamic capabilities for the maritime sector.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cite this article:
APA Style:
Arslan, A., & Akturan, A. (2026). From efficiency to resilience: Strategic shifts in maritime organizations through digitalization, ESG, and human capital (2018 - 2025). Maritime Technology and Research, 8(2), 283716. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2026.283716
MDPI Style:
Arslan, A.; Akturan, A. From efficiency to resilience: Strategic shifts in maritime organizations through digitalization, ESG, and human capital (2018 - 2025). Marit. Technol. Res. 2026, 8(2), 283716. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2026.283716
Vancouver Style:
Arslan A, Akturan A. (2026). From efficiency to resilience: Strategic shifts in maritime organizations through digitalization, ESG, and human capital (2018 - 2025). Marit. Technol. Res. 8(2): 283716. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2026.283716
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Highlights
- Maritime firms re-oriented their strategies from an efficiency-based approach toward a resilience-based approach in the year 2020 and beyond.
- Digitalization and ESG progressed from peripheral tools to core strategic drivers shaping competitiveness.
- Firms increasingly practice “glocal ESG adaptation”, blending global rules with locally innovated solutions.
- Strategic alliances evolved into long-term innovation ecosystems, especially around green corridors and digital platforms.
- Human capital and hybrid leadership—combining technical, digital, and people skills became critical enablers of resilience.
References
Akpinar, H., & Özer-Çaylan, D. (2023). Organizational resilience in maritime business: A systematic literature review. Management Research Review, 46(2), 245-267. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-12-2021-0866
Al-Hargusi, S. N., Al-Zaidi, S. A. K., Boeva, K., Dem’yanova, E., & Shevchenko, D. (2024). Digital transformation of maritime cargo shipping in international business. In E3S Web of Conferences, 515, 04019. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202451504019
Autsadee, Y., Jeevan, J., Mohd Salleh, N. H., & Othman, M. R. (2024). Digital wind of changes: Navigating competitiveness in the maritime sector through the transformation in human resource development. Maritime Business Review, 9(3), 204-228. https://doi.org/10.1108/mabr-11-2023-0079
Bayar, S. (2024). Evaluation of port state control inspections in Türkiye. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, 13(1), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.1402896
Baker, S. R., Farrokhnia, R. A., Meyer, S., Pagel, M., & Yannelis, C. (2020). How does household spending respond to an epidemic? Consumption during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 10(4), 834-862. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26983
Benatti, N., Groiss, M., Kelly, P., & López-García, P. (2024). The impact of environmental regulation on clean innovation: are there crowding out effects? (No. 2946). ECB Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2866/905142
Benedetti, E., Panzone, L., Cabernard, L., Wildman, J., & Seal, C. (2025). Border regulation and greenhouse gas emissions from EU-UK food trade. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 58, 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.020
Bhatia, V., & Kumar, S. (2024). The impact of ESG investing on portfolio performance: An empirical study of emerging markets. Journal of Informatics Education and Research, 4(3), 3314-3325. https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v4i3.1916
Boadu, S., Anu Thompson, E., Godavarthy, R., Boateng, A., & Penneigh, R. (2025). A decade of Smart Port Concept: A comprehensive review of past, present, and future implications. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2025.2546729
Bouteska, A., Harasheh, M., & Esposito, G. (2025). Climate transition risk, ESG rating divergence and portfolio performance: Evidence from composite scores and climate‐adjusted factor models. International Journal of Finance & Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.70038
Bui, V. D., & Nguyen, H. P. (2021). A comprehensive review on big data-based potential applications in marine shipping management. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 11(3), 1067-1077. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.11.3.15350
Chen, S. (2025). Literature review on the impact of esg on financial decision-making. Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences, 178(1), 61-65. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.22578
Dağıstan, U., Atalay, M., Aydın Ünal, D., & Aydın, S. Z. (2025). Sustainability of smart ports: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 15(3), 21582440251363339. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251363339
Langen, P. D. (2002). Clustering and performance: The case of maritime clustering in the Netherlands. Maritime Policy & Management, 29(3), 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830210132605
De, A., Wang, J., & Tiwari, M. K. (2019). Fuel bunker management strategies within sustainable container shipping operation considering disruption and recovery policies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(4), 1089-1111. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2019.2923342
Deepak, R. (2025). Emerging human resource practices in Indian major port authorities: Key strategies to sustain competitiveness in the global maritime sector. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, 9(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem42359
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Ding, X., Sheng, Z., Appolloni, A., Shahzad, M., & Han, S. (2024). Digital transformation, ESG practice, and total factor productivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4547-4561. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3718
Durán, C. A., Fernández-Campusano, C., Carrasco, R., Vargas, M., & Navarrete, A. (2021). Boosting the decision-making in smart ports by using blockchain. IEEE Access, 9, 128055-128068. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3112899
Durlik, I., Miller, T., Cembrowska-Lech, D., Krzemińska, A., Złoczowska, E., & Nowak, A. (2023). Navigating the sea of data: A comprehensive review on data analysis in maritime IoT applications. Applied Sciences, 13(17), 9742. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179742
Eccles, R. G., Lee, L. E., & Stroehle, J. C. (2020). The social origins of ESG: An analysis of Innovest and KLD. Organization & Environment, 33(4), 575-596. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619888994
Evans-Uzosike, I. O., & Okatta, C. G. The digital transformation of HR: Tools, challenges, and future directions. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 1(2), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2020.1.2.135-142
Gavalas, D., Syriopoulos, T., & Tsatsaronis, M. (2022). COVID-19 impact on the shipping industry: An event study approach. Transport Policy, 116, 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.11.016
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Gupta, H., & Chaudhary, R. (2023). An analysis of volatility and risk-adjusted returns of ESG indices in developed and emerging economies. Risks, 11(10), 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11100182
Haasis, H. D., & Hapsatou. (2022). Digital transformation of maritime supply chains focusing on ocean shipping, port management, and hinterland connection (pp. 173-184). Diginomics Research Perspectives: The Role of Digitalization in Business and Society. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Han, C., Abeysiriwardhane, A., Chai, S., & Maiti, A. (2021). Future directions for human-centered transparent systems for engine room monitoring in shore control centers. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10010022
Odziemkowska, K., & Henisz, W. J. (2021). Webs of influence: Secondary stakeholder actions and cross-national corporate social performance. Organization Science, 32(1), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1380
IMO. (2020). Cutting sulphur oxide emissions. Retrieved from https://www.imo.org/en
IMO. (2023). Strategy on reduction of GHG emissions from ships. Retrieved from https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/environment/pages/imo-strategy-on-reduction-of-ghg-emissions-from-ships.aspx
Karahalios, H. (2021). Contribution of PSC authorities to ship accident prevention. Operations Research Forum, 2(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-021-00053-4
Kong, J., Goh, M., & Cao, Y. (2024). Can digital economy development facilitate corporate ESG performance? Sustainability, 16(10), 3956. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16103956
Kressmann, K., & Mueller-Seeger, J. (2025). Harmonizing rigor, relevance, and insight: A mixed inductive approach for qualitative analysis with the Gioia methodology and the GABEK® method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, 16094069251342540. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251342540
Kuo, H. M., Chen, T. L., & Yang, C. S. (2022). The effects of institutional pressures on shipping digital transformation in Taiwan. Maritime Business Review, 7(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1108/MABR-04-2021-0030
Lee, P. T. W., Hu, Z. H., Lee, S. J., Choi, K. S., & Shin, S. H. (2018). Research trends and agenda on the Belt and Road (B&R) initiative with a focus on maritime transport. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(3), 282-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2017.1400189
Lim, S., Lee, C. H., Bae, J. H., & Jeon, Y. H. (2024). Identifying the optimal valuation model for maritime data assets with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Sustainability, 16(8), 3284. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202402.0827.v1
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newberry Park.
Liu, G., & Hamori, S. (2020). Can one reinforce investments in renewable energy stock indices with the ESG index? Energies, 13(5), 1179. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13051179
Margaretha, R., Syuzairi, M., & Mahadiansar, M. (2024). Digital transformation in the maritime industry: Opportunities and challenges for Indonesia. Journal of Maritime Policy and Strategy, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.36129/jmps.v1i1.7003
Meyer, C., Gerlitz, L., & Henesey, L. (2021). Cross-border capacity-building for port ecosystems in small and medium-sized baltic ports. Baltic Journal of European studies, 11(1), 113-132. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0008
Midoro, R., Musso, E., & Parola, F. (2005). Maritime liner shipping and the stevedoring industry: Market structure and competition strategies. Maritime Policy & Management, 32(2), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830500083521
Miller, M. (2012). Leadership in world shipping: Greek family firms in international business. Business History Review, 86(1), 173-175.
Monios, J., & Ng, A. K. (2021). Competing institutional logics and institutional erosion in environmental governance of maritime transport. Journal of Transport Geography, 94, 103114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103114
Nag, R., Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2007). The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management journal, 50(4), 821-847. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279173
Negara, A. B. P., Pradana, M., Silvianita, A., Rubiyanti, N., & Madiawati, P. N. (2024). Digital transformation and innovation strategies in classification societies. Journal of Electrical Systems, 20, 1042-1053. https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.2149
Nguyen, T. H. (2024). Investigating driving factors of digital transformation in the Vietnam shipping companies: Applied for TOE framework. Sage Open, 14(4), 21582440241301210. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241301210
OECD. (2025). The role of shipbuilding in maritime decarbonisation: Impacts of technology developments and policy measures. OECD Publishing, Paris.
Ogedengbe, D. E., Oladapo, J. O., Elufioye, O. A., Ejairu, E., & Ezeafulukwe, C. (2024). Strategic HRM in the logistics and shipping sector: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 11(1), 2000-2011. https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.10.1.0032
Oliver, C. (1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource‐based views. Strategic management journal, 18(9), 697-713. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3088134
Pangalos, G. (2023). Financing for a sustainable dry bulk shipping industry: What are the potential routes for financial innovation in sustainability and alternative energy in the dry bulk shipping industry? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16020101
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 4th eds. Sage Pub.
Poulsen, R. T., Ponte, S., & Sornn-Friese, H. (2018). Environmental upgrading in global value chains: The potential and limitations of ports in the greening of maritime transport. Geoforum, 89, 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.01.011
Sridar, P. S., Mellalli, P., Arthi, V. K., Ujwala, B., & Prasad, K. V. S. (2025). Strategic talent management in the digital era: Aligning workforce capabilities with organizational goals. Lex Localis, 23(S6), 4013-4022. https://doi.org/10.52152/802381
Stopford, M. (2008). Maritime economics 3e. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891742
Sudomyr, S., & Habor, V. (2025). Digital technologies as a tool for stimulating sustainable development of joint-stock companies (pp. 108-129). Digital transformation and IT implementation: Driving sustainable development across nations. Academic Council of the Scientific Center of Innovative Research. https://doi.org/10.36690/DTIT-108-129
Sun, J., Wang, H., & Cui, Z. (2023). Alleviating the bauxite maritime supply chain risks through resilient strategies: QFD-MCDM with intuitionistic fuzzy decision approach. Sustainability, 15(10), 8244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108244
Tam, K., & Jones, K. (2019). MaCRA: A model-based framework for maritime cyber-risk assessment. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 18(1), 129-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-019-00162-2
Tam, K., Forshaw, K., & Jones, K. (2019). Cyber-SHIP: Developing next generation maritime cyber research capabilities. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Marine Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.24868/icmet.oman.2019.005
Tapaninen, U., & Palu, R. (2022). Recovery of ro-pax ferry traffic from covid-19 under tightening environmental regulations: Case Helsinki-Tallinn. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 7(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-022-00112-x
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Tran, T., Morimoto, S., & Shibasaki, R. (2025). Modeling global and regional economic impacts of greenhouse gas pricing on international shipping and policy implications. Ocean & Coastal Management, 269, 107804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107804
Xidonas, P., & Essner, E. (2022). On esg portfolio construction: A multi-objective optimization approach. Computational Economics, 63(1), 21-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-022-10327-6
Yu, G. (2024). Digital transformation, human capital upgrading, and enterprise ESG performance: Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(4), 1465-1508. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3058
Yücel, M. E., & Yurtören, C. (2019). Determination of risk factors caused by ships in port planning. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 6(3), 254-263. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.641434
Zavitsas, K., Zis, T., & Bell, M. G. (2018). The impact of flexible environmental policy on maritime supply chain resilience. Transport Policy, 72, 116-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.09.020
Zhang, J., & Lv, T. (2022). Design and implementation of ship data analysis platform. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 2(1), 20-22. https://doi.org/10.54097/fcis.v2i1.2487
Zhang, L., Ye, Y., Meng, Z., Ma, N., & Wu, C. (2024). Enterprise digital transformation, dynamic capabilities, and ESG performance. Journal of Global Information Management, 32(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.335905
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maritime Technology and Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
