Beyond an Architectural Element: A Case Study of the ceiling Painting in the Renovation of the Faculty of Business Administration, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Nakhon Ratchasima
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study, conducted by an architect involved in the renovation project, examines 'The Ceiling Painting' initiative—a public art installation integrated into the renovation of the Faculty of Business Administration (BA) Building at Rajamangala University of Technology Isan (RMUTI). This project addresses the purely utilitarian function often ascribed to the built environment, aligning with Norberg-Schulz’s assertion that human-made spaces possess inherent structure and embody profound meanings. The research investigates how public art can significantly impact human experience by fostering identity, culture, and inspiration within an educational context.
Findings indicate that 'The Ceiling Painting' -----an intervention historically reserved for religious structures----- has evolved into an innovative architectural feature that defines the identity and ambiance of the BA Building. Beyond its aesthetic value, this installation actively fosters problem-solving, stimulates collaborative student projects, and drives interdisciplinary engagement. Furthermore, the project’s collaborative implementation has substantially contributed to knowledge management within the university by enhancing decision-making, increasing innovation and efficiency, reducing knowledge loss, and fostering a community of practice.
The study concludes that integrating painting with architectural elements offers a dynamic and enriching design approach that profoundly enhances teaching, practical learning experiences, and community engagement. While providing a robust qualitative analysis, the study highlights the need for further empirical investigation to quantitatively evaluate its specific impact on user learning, behavior, and productivity.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement
The copyright of this article is transferred to Journal of The Faculty of Architecture King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang with effect if and when the article is accepted for publication. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The author warrants that this contribution is original and that he/she has full power to make this grant. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.
References
Abel, C. (2000). Architecture and identity: Responses to cultural and technological change (2nd ed.). Architectural Press.
Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity (J. Howe, Trans.). Verso.
Conway, H., & Roenisch, R. (2005). Understanding architecture: An introduction to architecture and architectural history. Routledge.
Czech-Małyszek, A. (2018). The social character of art in architecture. Tekstura. Kwartalnik Architektoniczny, 2(18), 34-45.
Dovey, K. (2010). Becoming places: Urbanism, architecture, identity, power. Routledge.
Fisher, D. H. (1996). PUBLIC ART AND PUBLIC SPACE. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 79(1/2), 41–57. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41178737
Gombrich, E. H. (1995). The Story of Art (16th ed.). Phaidon Press.
Harvey, D. (1990). Between Space and Time: Reflections on the Geographical Imagination1. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 80(3), 418–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1990.tb00305.x
Krause, K. C. (2008). Public art: Theory, practice and populism. Blackwell Publishing.
Le Corbusier. (1946). Towards a new architecture. Architectural Press.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell.
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. MIT Press.
Neumeier, M. (2003). The brand gap. New Riders.
Nia, M. S., & Rahbarianyazd, A. (2020). The philosophy and aesthetics of Modern Architecture in the works of Walter Gropius, Le Corbusier, and Mies van der Rohe. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 12(4S), 312-321.
Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Academy Editions.
Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1), 57–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-8
Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. Pion.
Rieger-Jandl, A. (2006). Architecture and culture: Building in the tension of increasing global interaction. Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
RMUTI. (2012, July 25). Faculty of Management Building, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Nakhon Ratchasima (RMUTI). https://yayper.blogspot.com/2012/07/rmuti.html
Hall, S. (1989). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 222–237). Lawrence & Wishart.
