Enhancing Artistic Creation through Participatory Development Processes in Yaowarat Chinese Community

Main Article Content

Sirikoy Chutataweesawas
Tippanet Yaemmaneechai
Sumate Tanchareon
Rattanachada Tiawchamroen

Abstract

The research on Enhancing Artistic Creation through Participatory Development Processes in Yaowarat Chinese Community has the following objectives: 1) To design a creative process for community art that involves the participation of the Yaowarat community; 2) To create artworks that result from the active participation of the community; and 3) To evaluate the art exhibition and assess the suitability of products developed from the artworks. The research is divided into three phases: Phase 1 involves a literature review, interviews with experts and community members about Yaowarat's cultural capital, community art, participatory art, and relational aesthetics. Phase 2 consists of organizing community participatory art activities to create artworks through community involvement. Phase 3 focuses on developing the art pieces by collaborating with the community.


The research findings are as follows: 1) The creative process of community-based art using relational aesthetics helps foster relationships between the community and artists. It transforms viewers into co-creators, making art a tool for communication and understanding between the community, artists, and society. 2) The development of artworks inspired by the Chinese culture of the Yaowarat community resulted in the production of three paintings, three sculptures, one video art piece, and one installation art piece. These artworks were shaped through participatory art activities with both community members and outsiders. All the artworks, therefore, arose from this collaboration between the community and artists.      3) The evaluation of the art exhibition showed a very high level of satisfaction (equation = 4.73, S.D. = 0.493) The exhibition also allowed outsiders to participate in creating art, fostering a cultural exchange between the community and society. 4) The development of products from the paintings received high approval from experts (equation  = 4.73, S.D. = 0.070). These products, derived from the paintings, were practical for everyday use, making art more accessible commercially, and helped generate income for the community, while also promoted an appreciation of the community's identity.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chutataweesawas, S., Yaemmaneechai, T., Tanchareon, S., & Tiawchamroen, R. (2025). Enhancing Artistic Creation through Participatory Development Processes in Yaowarat Chinese Community. Asian Creative Architecture, Art and Design, 38(1), e275716. https://doi.org/10.55003/acaad.2025.275716
Section
Research Articles

References

Ball, D., & Koerner, A. (2018). The process of creating public art in Martin County, Florida. In Community art: A look at public art in America (pp. 14-21). National Endowment for the Arts.

Bishop, C. (2023). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso books. https://books.google.co.th/books?hl=en&lr=&id=rpZpEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Artificial+hells:+Participatory+art+and+the+politics+of+spectatorship.+Verso.&ots=W7M8Ii1CXh&sig=iIHB7SUJI3Rygq6zC1aOfvwbCt4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Artificial%20hells%3A%20Participatory%20art%20and%20the%20politics%20of%20spectatorship.%20Verso.&f=false

Bourriaud, N. (2020). Relational aesthetics. Les presses du réel.

Bublitz, M. G., Rank-Christman, T., Cian, L., Cortada, X., Madzharov, A., Patrick, V. M., Peracchio, L. A., Scott, M. L., Sundar, A., To, N. (R.), & Townsend, C. (2019). Collaborative art: A transformational force within communities. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 4(4), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1086/705023

Cartiere, C., & Zebracki, M. (2015). The everyday practice of public art. Routledge.

Durrer, V., Gilmore, A., & Stevenson, D. (2019). Arts councils, policymaking and “the local.” Cultural Trends, 28(4), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2019.1644795

Goldbard, A. (2006). New creative community: The art of cultural development. New Village Press. https://www.arts.gov/stories/magazine/2018/2/community-art-look-public-art-america

Kester, G. H. (2004). Conversation Pieces: Community and communication in modern art. University of California Press.

Lyusyena, k., & Stephenson, M.Jr. (2019). Arts as Dialogic Practice: Deriving Lessons for Change from Community-based Artmaking for International Development. Psych, 1(1),375-390. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych1010027

Lacy, S. (2008). Time in place: New genre public art a decade later. In The practice of public art (pp. 18-32). Routledge.

Petchjeen, M., Masjiracharapak, P., & Wanta, J. (2021). Identity of the Sam Phrang community and Bang Lamphu community in using art as a tool for creating added value for tourism. Journal of Research and Development, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, 13(2), 70-95. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/irdssru/article/view/250854/172654 (in Thai)

Phonpirun, P. (2013). Creative Economy and the Development of Thailand. Economics Review Journal, National Institute of Development Administration, 7(1), 1-69. (in Thai) https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NER/article/view/22675/19396

Rungrojnsitthichai, N., & Charoenrat, S. (2021). Changes and Impacts toward Spatial Identity of the Old Market Traditional Shop-Houses in Yaowarat Community, Bangkok’s Chinatown. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat, 8(7), 282-294. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JMND/article/view/253528 (in Thai)

Wanichachiva, N. (2020.Towards creative and cultural capital development of Yaowarat. Silpakorn University. (in Thai)

Stein, C.H., Faigin, D.A. (2015) Community-Based Arts Initiatives: Exploring the Science of the Arts. American Community Psychol, 55, 70–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9698-3