Participatory design of landscape at ‘transit areas’ in tourism community: A case of Mahasawat Canal’s Community, Nakhon Pathom Province

Main Article Content

Tapanee Rattanathavorn

Abstract

The aim of this research is the landscape design at the transit area in a participatory tourism community in Mahasawat Canal Community in Nakhon Pathom Province. The Mahasawat Canal Community, a central region community based on agriculture, has formed a group of farmers to transform the community into an agricultural tourism destination. The community offers boat tours under the name "Boat Tour... Viewing the Gardens Along the Mahasawat Canal." This has now become a well-known agricultural tourism destination. The starting point of the boat tour and sightseeing route is at Suwannaram Temple, a public area popular with both Thai and international tourists, as well as local residents, due to its location where land, water, and rail routes converge, also known as a "transit area." This article therefore has the following objectives: 1) to study the physical characteristics and activity characteristics of transit areas within the Maha Sawat Canal community; 2) to analyze the potential, physical problems, and relationships between the physical characteristics and activity characteristics of transit areas within the Maha Sawat Canal community; and 3) to propose guidelines for landscape design within transit areas under a participatory process within the Maha Sawat Canal community. The research methodology uses secondary data, field surveys, non-participatory observation, in-depth interviews, and presentation of design concepts and spatial plans through participatory processes, using focus groups and public hearings with community members and relevant stakeholders. The research was conducted between January and December 2019.The research results revealed that this community's temple serves as the central transit area. Therefore, the design concept emphasizes the uniqueness of the community's important temple buildings, creating a striking and elegant landmark. The open space and waterfront areas were redesigned to align with the temple's key building layout, effectively supporting tourism, traditional and cultural activities, and the waterfront lifestyle of local residents. The area is divided into eight public areas, including: a canalside area, a museum area, a temple area, a parking area, a school area, a train station area, a temporary parking area, and a canalside rest area. The details are: 1) The riverside plaza is designated to accommodate a variety of activities and connects directly to the tourist center, promoting it as a "Port-to-Path Gateway" for land and water transportation. 2) The museum plaza is designated as a key community activity area, supporting learning, meeting, and tourism. It serves as a "Canal Connect Commons Node" and a transition point between walking and canalside activities. 3) The temple plaza serves as a symbolic center. The design emphasizes a north-south axis connecting the pier and the temple entrance, opening up new perspectives and restoring the original historical axis. This plaza plays a role in "connecting the north-south circulation spine." 4) The main parking lot serves as a "transit-support space" for those traveling by private vehicle. The parking area is organized and landscaped, creating a welcoming atmosphere before entering the area. 5) The school plaza is a multi-purpose space connecting the school and the temple, serving as a "shared space" with the surrounding community. Enhance the positive image of the entrance area. 6) The train station yard is designated as a "Primary Access Node" for passengers arriving from outside the area by train, playing a key role in the area's "Mass Transit System." 7) The temporary parking lot is designed to accommodate use during important traditional events, which see higher than normal vehicle traffic. This area is designated as "Flexible Festive Parking." 8) The riverside relaxation area, located at the foot of the bridge, is limited in space. Therefore, the design provides a waiting area and a scenic viewpoint of the temple. It also includes a safe and convenient pier for boats to board and disembark. This area serves as a "Landscape Transition Space," connecting the community and the temple. The research concludes that preserving the community’s identity requires the preparation of design manuals, measures, regulations, local ordinances or regulations to create a unique identity for the community, and prioritize the improvement of landscape environment to make it safe and convenient for local and visitors under control measures and incentive measures of physical landscape development of the community.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rattanathavorn, T. (2025). Participatory design of landscape at ‘transit areas’ in tourism community: A case of Mahasawat Canal’s Community, Nakhon Pathom Province. Asian Creative Architecture, Art and Design, e278780. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/archkmitl/article/view/278780
Section
Research Articles

References

Arayanimitsakul, C. (2015). Plants in landscape architecture. Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)

Arbter, K., Handler, M., Purker, E., Tappeiner, G., & Trattnigg, R. (2007). The public participation manual: Shaping the future together. Austrian Society for Environment and Technology. https://www.oegut.at/downloads/pdf/part_publ-part-manual.pdf

Bono, E. (1992). Teach your children how to think. Penguin Books.

Chulalongkorn University, Department of Landscape. (1988). Urban landscape development guideline for tourism. Tourism Authority of Thailand. (in Thai)

Chulasai, B. (2003). Environmental impact assessment & architectural design. Chulalongkorn University Printing House. (in Thai)

Clarke, B., & Harvey, N. (2008, May 4–10). Formal vs informal participatory EIA methods: A South Australian case study [Paper presentation]. The Art and Science of Impact Assessment, 28th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA08), Perth, Australia. https://conferences.iaia.org/2008/pdf/IAIA08Proceedings/IAIA08ConcurrentSessions/CS2-3_Participatory-EIA-South-Australia_Clarke.pdf

Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (Methodological perspectives). Aldine Publishing Company.

Google. (n.d.). [Google map of “transit area” and tourism attraction in the community]. Retrieved April 10, 2019, from https://www.google.com/maps/@13.8153416

Hamilton Planning and Economic Development Department (HPEDD). (2012). City-wide corridor planning principles and design guidelines. https://www.hamilton.ca/sites/default/files/2022-04/pedpolicies-citywide-corridor-planningprinciples-designguidelines.pdf

Japan International Cooperation Agency. (2005). The comprehensive urban development programme in Hanoi Capital City of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (HAIDEP). https://openjicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/11856093_01.pdf

Kasampolkoon, A. (2016). Salaya district: Happy life travel and tourism. Samlada. (in Thai)

King Prajadhipok's Institute. (2004). Guidelines for assessing the involvement of the political community in decentralization context. King Prajadhipok's Institute. (in Thai)

Mumma, A. (2009). The link between traditional and formal legal systems. In W. Ndoro & G. Pwiti (Eds.), Legal framework for the protection of immovable cultural heritage in Africa (pp. 22–24). UNESCO World Heritage Centre.

Norberg-Schulz, C. (1971). Existence, space and architecture. Praeger.

Phasookniran, S. (1994). Design in the built environment. Prakaipruge. (in Thai)

Pinthong, J. (1983). Public participation in development. Saksopa. (in Thai)

Pujinda, P. (2007). Criticize city. Chulalongkorn University Printing House. (in Thai)

Rapeepat, A. (1988). Rural development problems: Lessons from the case of lifting the charter—Mae Klong River Basin Rural Development Project. Research and Development Institute, Khon Kaen University. (in Thai)

Rattanathavon, T., & Jittiwasurat, P. (2020). Development of agro-cultural tourism route based on spatial configuration analysis: The case of a rubber planting village, Songkhla Province, Thailand. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 18, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ2020184762 (in Thai)

Reid, G. W. (1987). Landscape graphics. The Architectural Press.

Rojanapradit, K. (2009). Roof garden design and the health landscape design principles [Master’s thesis, Silpakorn University]. Silpakorn University Repository. https://sure.su.ac.th/xmlui/handle/123456789/12770 (in Thai)

Simonds, J. O. (1983). Landscape architecture: A manual of site planning and design. McGraw-Hill.

Simpson, B. J. (1994). Urban public transport today. E & FN Spon.

Siriphanich, S. (2011). Fundamental landscape. Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus. (in Thai)

Suchaya, C. (2009). Urban conservation. Amarin Printing and Publishing. (in Thai)

Thongngamkam, N. (2006). Spatial development guidelines for Phra Khanong and Onnut market area, Bangkok [Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.THE.2006.1879 (in Thai)

Wilcox, D. (2003). The guide to effective participation. Delta Press.

Yılmaz, S., & Mumcu, S. (2016). Urban green areas and design principles. In R. Efe, I. Curebal, A. Gad, & B. Toth (Eds.), Environmental sustainability and landscape management (Chapter 6, pp. 100–118). St. Kliment Ohridski University Press.