The investigation of the reused household glass packaging for eco-art creation guideline
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study on reused household glass packaging adopts a developmental research approach to identify effective methods for managing glass bottle waste. It focuses on transforming discarded bottles into reusable materials through recycling to maximize their value. The creation of environmentally friendly products thus provides a guideline for eco-art development. The objectives were (1) to examine and experiment with household glass waste to identify suitable processes for eco-art production, and (2) to synthesize guidelines for eco-art creation and disseminate the acquired knowledge. The research employed a mixed-method approach, including a survey of second-hand shops in Bangkok and surrounding areas to assess the types and quantities of discarded glass packaging, with experimental research involving interviews with government-affiliated glass product experts and three glass artists experts, and the artistic creations were evaluated by 100 participants.
The findings revealed eight distinct glass packaging types, categorized by color, with clear, amber, and green. Glass conditions were divided into intact bottles and broken fragments. Three experimental plans were conducted to determine optimal artistic processes, controlling for material type, time, and temperature. Results showed no significant differences in glass melting outcomes across trials, with effective melting occurring at 750–800°C, allowing for effective reuse of glass waste. Five distinct artistic designs were developed and disseminated, with the fifth set receiving the highest satisfaction with mean = 4.51. The most innovative and aesthetically relevant design achieved satisfaction with mean = 4.57, while the eco-art development potential of glass packaging waste received with mean = 4.52.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement
The copyright of this article is transferred to Journal of The Faculty of Architecture King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang with effect if and when the article is accepted for publication. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The author warrants that this contribution is original and that he/she has full power to make this grant. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.
References
Amornwitwat, S. (2004). Turn glass fragments into products. National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT).
Business Waste. (2023). How to Reduce Glass Waste. https://www.businesswaste.co.uk/reduce-waste/how-to-reduce-glass-waste/
Creative Economy Agency. (n.d.). About us. https://www.cea.or.th/th/about (in Thai)
Fry, T. (2009). Design futuring: Sustainability, ethics and new practice. Berg Publishers.
Howkins, J. (2001). The creative economy: How people make money from ideas. Penguin.
Jitpimolmard, S., Tongkarnpanit, P., Chotipatthamanon, S., & Disatapundhu, S. (2023). Creating Social Enterprise for Ecological Art Exhibition. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Rajapruk University, 9(2), 125–140. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rpu/article/view/271194 (in Thai)
Jonas, W. (2012). Design research and its meaning to the methodological development of the discipline. In L. Valentine (Ed.), The Routledge companion to design research (pp. 41–54). Routledge.
Kanchanaworawanich, B. (2010). Tiles made from broken glass. National Metal and Materials Technology Center. https://www.mtec.or.th/?option=com_content&task=view&id=1055&Itemid=3%206
Pollution Control Department. (2020). Comprehensive community waste management. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. (in Thai)
McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North Point Press.
NBBJ, Berger Partnership. (2023). Forest Net (work). SEGD (Society for Experiential Graphic Design). https://segd.org/projects/forest-network-2/
Saito, Y. (2007). Everyday aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Saito, Y. (2017). Aesthetics of the familiar: Everyday life and world-making. Oxford University Press.
Sung, K. (2015). A review on upcycling: Current body of literature, knowledge gaps and a way forward. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Environmental, Cultural, Economic & Social Sustainability, Venice, 17, 28–40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299559229_A_Review _on_Upcycling_Current_Body_of_Literature_Knowledge_Gaps_and_a_Way_Forward (in Thai)
T.saengchantara, W., Sriprasertsuk, S., Suwannason, P., & Suwannason, P. (2016). A Development of moisture resistant lightweight material from cullet and fly ash. Bulletin of Applied Sciences, 5(5), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.60136/bas.v5.2016.282 (in Thai)