Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance of the Company Listed in Thailand SET 50 INDEX
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research article has the following objectives: 1. To examine the good corporate governance of the companies. 2. To examine the operating performance of the companies. 3. To examine the relationship between corporate governance and corporate performance of the company listed in Thailand SET 50 Index. This research is a quantitative. The population and sample included listed companies in the Thailand SET 50 Index group during years 2019 – 2021. The corporate governance variables studied included the shareholding proportion of the executive board, the proportion of independent directors, the consolidation of the position of chairman and CEO, the size of the executive board, and the number of board meetings, company operations included Return of Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), and Tobin’s Q Ratio. Analysis by using descriptive statistics and Predict influence of good corporate governance on performance of the company by using Multiple regression analysis at a statistic significant level of 0.05. Research found that the size of the executive board, and the number of board meetings affected the company operating performance in term of Return on Equity (ROE), which can be written as the following equation. Company operating performance in term of ROE = 16.143 – 1.275 (Board Size) + 0.525 (Number of Board Meeting)
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ปรากฏในวารสารนี้ เป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียน ซึ่งสมาคมนักวิจัยไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วยเสมอไป การนำเสนอผลงานวิจัยและบทความในวารสารนี้ไปเผยแพร่สามารถกระทำได้ โดยระบุแหล่งอ้างอิงจาก "วารสารสมาคมนักวิจัย"
References
Arora, A., & Sharma, C. (2016). Corporate governance and firm performance in developing countries: Evidence from India. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 16(2), 420-440.
Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 257-273.
Black, B. S., Jang, H., & Kim, W. (2006). Does corporate governance predict firms’ market values? Evidence from Korea. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 22(2), 366-413.
Chiang, H. T. (2005). An empirical study of corporate governance and corporate performance of listed companies in Taiwan. Journal of American Academy of Business, 6(2), 260-267.
Conger, J. A., Finegold, D., & Lawler, E. E. (1998). Appraising boardroom performance. Harvard Business Review, 76(1), 136-148.
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., & Roengpitya, R. (2007). Meta-analyses of financial performance and equity: Fusion or confusion?. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 1-12.
Durnev, A., & Kim, E. H. (2005). To steal or not to steal: Firm attributes, legal environment, and valuation. The Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1461-1493.
Evans, J., & Weir, C. (1995). Corporate governance and the board of directors. Journal of General Management, 20(3), 1-15.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107-155.
Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 7-26.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Khunthongjan, S. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance: A study of the Stock Exchange of Thailand[Doctoral dissertation, Thammasat University].
Klapper, L. F., & Love, I. (2004). Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(5), 703-728.
Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59-77.
Rashid, A., & Lodh, S. C. (2011). Corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. International Journal of
Economics and Finance, 3(1), 135-144.
Rechner, P. L., & Dalton, D. R. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 155-160.
Sarapaivanich, N. (2013). Corporate governance and firm performance: The case of Thai listed companies. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 3(2), 133-146.
Suwan, O. et al. (2018). The relationship between corporate governance and performance of listed companies on the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Journal of Business Administration and Social Sciences, 1(2), 45-62.
Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113-142.
Wilai, S., et al. (2015). Corporate governance and financial performance of Thai companies. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(10), 55-68.
Wiriya, R. et al. (2020). The influence of corporate governance on investor confidence in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 12(1), 88-105.
