Nanjing College's Development and Innovation in Digital Education Under the Strong National Strategy of Innovation and Technology
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
This study aims to examine the mechanisms influencing digital education innovation in higher education institutions within the regional innovation system of Nanjing, China. It focuses on identifying key factors and analyzing the relationships among motivation mechanisms, operational logic, resource matching, and innovation outcomes based on the Triple Helix and Regional Innovation System perspectives.
A quantitative research design was employed. Data were collected from administrators and faculty members involved in digital education initiatives, and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).
The results indicate that both motivation mechanisms and operational logic have significant positive effects on digital education innovation, with operational logic exerting the strongest influence. Additionally, resource matching fully mediates the relationship between digital education development and innovation outcomes, suggesting that digital initiatives contribute to innovation only when strategic objectives, human capital, financial resources, and technological infrastructure are properly aligned. The model explains 38.2% of the variance in innovation outcomes.
The findings highlight the importance of effective governance, collaborative processes, and strategic resource alignment in promoting sustainable digital education innovation in regional higher education institutions.
Article Details
อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ปรากฏในวารสารนี้ เป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียน ซึ่งสมาคมนักวิจัยไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วยเสมอไป การนำเสนอผลงานวิจัยและบทความในวารสารนี้ไปเผยแพร่สามารถกระทำได้ โดยระบุแหล่งอ้างอิงจาก "วารสารสมาคมนักวิจัย"
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform
policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional
Studies, 45(7), 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of
Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Cai, Y., & Amaral, A. (2021). Theoretical perspectives on the relationship between universities
and regional innovation systems. Higher Education Policy, 34(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00195-3
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems
and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Gasparin, M., & Quinn, M. (2021). Designing digital transformation in higher education:
Resource alignment and organizational capability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120402
Han, Y. (2024). Collaborative governance and efficiency improvement in digital education
in the background of educational digitalization. China Educational Technology, 3,
–23.
Huai, J. (2024). Ethical governance and talent cultivation in intelligent education. Journal of
Educational Development Research, 12(4), 1–8.
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2023). Digital education strategic
action plan. Beijing, China: Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China.
Project Team of Digital Education Fronts. (2025). Digital education as a driver of global
educational reform and sustainable development. Educational Research, 46(2), 3–12.
Somthawinpongsai, C., Vorayotha, C., Yang, C., Lu, L., & Tee, M. (2025). Narrative design for
SDG-oriented social innovation: The Koh Kret model. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(S3), 885–895. Retrieved from https://tpmap.org/submission/index.php/tpm/article/view/550
Somthawinpongsai, C., Zhou, F., Wiwitkunkasem, K., Chanwichian, J., & Xing, J. (2024). Digital
communication strategies in promoting sustainable agriculture: Organic products in Central Thailand. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 2822–2838. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.4931
